25
Comments (9)
sorted by:
9
Dtom 9 points ago +9 / -0

Just because the source had legal access to the returns, doesn't mean they were legally allowed to share it with the Times.

2
Scuffers 2 points ago +2 / -0

that's the definition of a leaker

9
rimper 9 points ago +9 / -0

Lol... "Legal access to it" doesn't mean these people can legally, publicly disseminate it... What a goofy fuck.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
yallsegregationist 3 points ago +3 / -0

stelter really is that dumb. yes whoever provided had legal access to it but providing it to anyone who doesn’t is a crime.

2
latetotheparty 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe the NYT has the same legal eagle as CNN - when Cuomo advised viewers that it's illegal for them to look at Wikileaks but legal for CNN because the press is different....

1
FreedomFromGovt 1 point ago +1 / -0

The sources might've had "legal access" to it, but it's the leaking of what is otherwise-confidential tax return contents to the public that's the problem, here, you grotesque little pansy.

1
RedTruck88 1 point ago +1 / -0

So Trump team leaked it to clear himself before the election??

1
Scuffers 1 point ago +1 / -0

you know it's either a deep state cunt in the IRS or the SDNY attorney's office (I'm assuming they got them?)