I always know which conspiracies to believe because those are the ones that the left always seem to be quick to try and debunk or condemn.
They never talk about condemning those who say lizard people run the world, or those who talk aliens or whatever, so those are probably far reaching and donβt have much (accurate) truth behind them. Given how fast they are to debunk pedogate and condemn QAnon makes me very suspicious.
Flat earth, holographic moon, NASA covering up UFO sightings, Secret Monsters, Ghost Stories, these are all huge conspiracy theories with massive numbers of 'followers' that don't get the time of day in the media.
Instead they claim anything that actually has evidence as 'a debunked conspiracy' and pretend saying the word 'debunked' is all it takes to erase all the freely availible evidence*.
Say whatever you want about Qanon, they have collectively made it their mission in life to expose pedophiles online. I don't care if they believe in the Tooth fairy, I'm going to stand back and let them work.
*In this case the 'evidence' is the number of pedos exposed by Qanon on twitter, which was the catalyst that made them targets of the left.
I dug into it once, at least the modern luddites can all be traced back to a single person. One 'Guru' that fancies himself the Deepak Chopra of universal truths about the 'reality' of our flat universe. It's as close to an actual cult as any of the conspiracy theories I've looked through, though most of the followers are just real short on brainpower and believe some of the crackpot insane explanations for the clearly observable curvature of the earth being an 'illusion' that actually proves it is flat.
I also wondered if it wasn't artificially pushed, because they intentionally cross a lot of their 'evidence' from UFO enthusiasts as proof that NASA is really lying to cover up that the earth is flat, not hiding UFOs. Keeps eyes off the things NASA is actually covering up, which are far more likely to be spy-planes and spy-satellites than anything else.
I also can't believe anyone could actually look at any of the flat earth stuff and say "Hey, yeah, it all makes sense!" I mean some of it is very funny in its creative around-your-ass-to-get-to-your-elbow rationalizing, but none of it is even remotely plausible. It's like it is a philosophy created to be perfectly reflect the analysis made by the Billy Madison quiz host
"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it."
ok. that is very strange, I will give you that Qtards. again, understand, if you are correct and I was erroneously insulting you this whole time I will literally suck all of your dicks. I am just skeptical, because whytf wouldnt I be?
also I love that our illustrious House spends all day condemning things, you're welcome for the 6 figure salaries + crime benefits you fucking blowhard weirdo wastes of space.
By Q clock you mean a bunch of vague riddles where he says things that are blatant lies or don't ever come true? It's at best a larp and at worst a psyop designed so useful idiots sit on their ass instead of attempting to take their country back.
Blah blah blah, more "no matter what you say imma complain like a little bitch.". Whatever. I mod the Q WIN. I do this 24 hours a day. Sit back, then, liddle buddy.
You admittingly waste a disproportionate amount of your time as acting janitor on a website dedicated to logging the posts made on the internet by a gay larp? And you do it for free? You actually admit to this?
What grand riddle is this referring to then? None. It's a fucking lie and a larp.
No, he said TRUST WRAY. Doesn't mean he's our guy. There is no one in any of these agencies who is on the side of good. How would they get promoted? They'll all be outsiders like Durham or Grenell.
It's fake because he's made a bunch of stupid predictions that did not come true, such as Hillary, Huma, and Podesta getting arrested. I don't give a shit who it actually is, it doesn't matter. It's fake and gay.
Now I have no problem with his "followers" researching and finding new shit, but that doesn't make him some military intelligence insider or whatever he claims.
I don't know why they're going to all the effort for this. All they have to do is Ask The Question.
Reporter: "Mister President, who is Q?"
President: "Who?" or "That's not a real thing," or something along those lines = a very demoralized, once active part of his voting block, who will no longer be campaigning for him online and might then believe there's no point in even going out to vote.
OR
President: "My fellow Americans, the Storm is upon us." = a very large part of his base, now freaked out, and scared centrists and undecided who are seeing article after article bombarding them talking about how the POTUS was running a military psy-op on the citizens of the United States, and could very well shy away from voting for him because of it.
Either way, win-win for the Dems and the Journos- but I repeat myself. So why not just ask the actual question, to the President, instead of tiptoeing around it?
They already did at a briefing at the White House - I watched it live. He said something along the lines that he didn't really know much about it other than that people who follow it really like him. They pressed him further about if he would condemn a conspiracy that he is saving the world by fighting human trafficking and he asked something back like: "Is that supposed to be a bad thing"?
The week leading up to it everyone thought they were about to do a false flag and blame "QAnon" as they suddenly started asking everyone about it after tons of silence from the press including Mike Pence as well.
Oh no, I remember that very well. He was asked what he thinks about the QANON movement. Which is a step in the right direction, but not quite where it needs to be. If they want it to be over one way or another, they need to directly ask, without all the soapboxing.
Asking questions like that, it only gets more people looking into it, and having to ask themselves, "Well, is it a bad thing to want to take down pedo rings?" Shot themselves in the foot with it, and didn't even follow it up with the old tried and true Oh Conservatives And Their Ridiculous ThInK oF tHe cHiLdRen line they normally do.
I guess - I mean I've followed it all losely but I don't get the obsession with that question. I know it seems "pointed" but it is kind of not a likely question from the media's point of view if you think about it.
There has not been any direct public vouching from any part of the government in terms of QAnon. So asking "Who is Q?" is skipping steps because it would be assuming it is widely accepted as the truth. If there were rumors of some crazy serial killer "The Fork" going around but no confirmed deaths from any real source would it make any sense for the press to go ask the local police station about "Who is The Fork?" not "What do you think about the rumors of The Fork?" or is "The Fork a conspiracy theory?".
You can't really pretend Trump's answer (even if it wasn't "the question") puts it solely on the media for not asking (if it was true). He answered it like a boss like usual but he definitely didn't add any credibility to it or say anything that would provoke the media to ask further.
If the media behaved in the way the media is supposed to behave, I'd absolutely agree with you. But these are the same people that screamed about Russia from the top of their lungs for years now based on a leak to Yahoo about a pee tape that doesn't exist, you know? They've thrown literally everything else at the President with the hope that it would stick, but this one thing is what they're going to try and do due diligence about?
I mean, it could be. God knows, looking at this year, weirder shit has happened. It just personally strikes me as really odd, that there's a three word question that they could ask, bluntly, and then not only get a shit ton of clicks on their dying websites, but would also do damage to the President no matter how he answered it.
I have not yet but I read stuff from you all every so often. I don't care for that board too much because half the time I've gone it has a bunch of shady links to be honest.
It sure would be nice for Q to deliver and vindicate people like myself, I'm sick and tired of believing in something and then looking like a fool afterwards.
Nothing says im guilty of unspeakable crimes more than introducing a Bill to condem a larp that says you (democrats) are guilty of unspeakable crimes! ππ
That's like the House introducing a bill to condemn Pepe the frog.
Der fuk?
I always know which conspiracies to believe because those are the ones that the left always seem to be quick to try and debunk or condemn.
They never talk about condemning those who say lizard people run the world, or those who talk aliens or whatever, so those are probably far reaching and donβt have much (accurate) truth behind them. Given how fast they are to debunk pedogate and condemn QAnon makes me very suspicious.
^ This guy conspiracies.
Flat earth, holographic moon, NASA covering up UFO sightings, Secret Monsters, Ghost Stories, these are all huge conspiracy theories with massive numbers of 'followers' that don't get the time of day in the media.
Instead they claim anything that actually has evidence as 'a debunked conspiracy' and pretend saying the word 'debunked' is all it takes to erase all the freely availible evidence*.
Say whatever you want about Qanon, they have collectively made it their mission in life to expose pedophiles online. I don't care if they believe in the Tooth fairy, I'm going to stand back and let them work.
*In this case the 'evidence' is the number of pedos exposed by Qanon on twitter, which was the catalyst that made them targets of the left.
I'm pretty sure the "Flat Earth" people are paid to spread their conspiracy.
It benefits all the people involved in the real conspiracies for the average person to associate the term with made up nonsense.
I dug into it once, at least the modern luddites can all be traced back to a single person. One 'Guru' that fancies himself the Deepak Chopra of universal truths about the 'reality' of our flat universe. It's as close to an actual cult as any of the conspiracy theories I've looked through, though most of the followers are just real short on brainpower and believe some of the crackpot insane explanations for the clearly observable curvature of the earth being an 'illusion' that actually proves it is flat.
I also wondered if it wasn't artificially pushed, because they intentionally cross a lot of their 'evidence' from UFO enthusiasts as proof that NASA is really lying to cover up that the earth is flat, not hiding UFOs. Keeps eyes off the things NASA is actually covering up, which are far more likely to be spy-planes and spy-satellites than anything else.
I also can't believe anyone could actually look at any of the flat earth stuff and say "Hey, yeah, it all makes sense!" I mean some of it is very funny in its creative around-your-ass-to-get-to-your-elbow rationalizing, but none of it is even remotely plausible. It's like it is a philosophy created to be perfectly reflect the analysis made by the Billy Madison quiz host
I grew up listening to art bell and reading the conspiracy boards back in the 90s
This type of fervor to go after this particular conspiracy only grants it legitimacy
Art Bell was the only reason to turn on the radio from 1995-2002.
Sponsor of the bill.. .... and Of course it's New Jersey https://www.congress.gov/member/tom-malinowski/M001203?searchResultViewType=expanded
Is this what being over the target looks like?
ok. that is very strange, I will give you that Qtards. again, understand, if you are correct and I was erroneously insulting you this whole time I will literally suck all of your dicks. I am just skeptical, because whytf wouldnt I be?
also I love that our illustrious House spends all day condemning things, you're welcome for the 6 figure salaries + crime benefits you fucking blowhard weirdo wastes of space.
Leave our dicks out of it. Just prepare to dance when it all goes down. Runway not clear yet. We need to confirm the SCOTUS first.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1310231624240500736.html
Antifa violence is a myth. Introduces bill to condemn qanon.
It sure would be nice for Q to PROVE that it isn't a LARP and is real.
Then when is the shit going to fall ? He keeps promising every week and nothing. I honestly don't give a shit anymore. It's demoralizing.
You can't say when shit will fall because then the enemy knows...
Only 1200 days left in the Trump presidency... Hakuna your tatas
He said Hillary was indicted YEARS ago and it was a lie. He also said to trust Sessions every week for a few years.
Q is fake and gay.
Yeah, that's not how that works. Learn what the Q clock is. Future proves past, etc
By Q clock you mean a bunch of vague riddles where he says things that are blatant lies or don't ever come true? It's at best a larp and at worst a psyop designed so useful idiots sit on their ass instead of attempting to take their country back.
Blah blah blah, more "no matter what you say imma complain like a little bitch.". Whatever. I mod the Q WIN. I do this 24 hours a day. Sit back, then, liddle buddy.
You admittingly waste a disproportionate amount of your time as acting janitor on a website dedicated to logging the posts made on the internet by a gay larp? And you do it for free? You actually admit to this?
What grand riddle is this referring to then? None. It's a fucking lie and a larp.
https://i.ibb.co/7JkjdrZ/1601372886210.png
So Wray really is our guy then?
Sessions too. We must #trustsessions
No, Wray is a black hat. I think his days are numbered.
Oh I agree. Q said he was our guy back in the day.
No, he said TRUST WRAY. Doesn't mean he's our guy. There is no one in any of these agencies who is on the side of good. How would they get promoted? They'll all be outsiders like Durham or Grenell.
What post number?
Post here so I can see it
Here you go
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1310231624240500736.html
Is the Mike Pompeii green tie proof included ?
https://www.qanondebunked.com/2020/08/08/non-comprehensive-list-of-qdrops-that-have-been-debunked/
What do you mean? Name the person running the account? How the fuck should I know
It's fake because he's made a bunch of stupid predictions that did not come true, such as Hillary, Huma, and Podesta getting arrested. I don't give a shit who it actually is, it doesn't matter. It's fake and gay.
Now I have no problem with his "followers" researching and finding new shit, but that doesn't make him some military intelligence insider or whatever he claims.
WWG1WGA!
Yeah I thought Q was a larper or a bunch of larpers. High quality stuff- but still larpers.
Now I know Q is real.
History is gonna hurt the butts of many patriots, whom were "too smart to fall for the LARP"
How to basically indicate that what Qanon is talking about has truth lol
I don't know why they're going to all the effort for this. All they have to do is Ask The Question.
Reporter: "Mister President, who is Q?"
President: "Who?" or "That's not a real thing," or something along those lines = a very demoralized, once active part of his voting block, who will no longer be campaigning for him online and might then believe there's no point in even going out to vote.
OR
President: "My fellow Americans, the Storm is upon us." = a very large part of his base, now freaked out, and scared centrists and undecided who are seeing article after article bombarding them talking about how the POTUS was running a military psy-op on the citizens of the United States, and could very well shy away from voting for him because of it.
Either way, win-win for the Dems and the Journos- but I repeat myself. So why not just ask the actual question, to the President, instead of tiptoeing around it?
They already did at a briefing at the White House - I watched it live. He said something along the lines that he didn't really know much about it other than that people who follow it really like him. They pressed him further about if he would condemn a conspiracy that he is saving the world by fighting human trafficking and he asked something back like: "Is that supposed to be a bad thing"?
The week leading up to it everyone thought they were about to do a false flag and blame "QAnon" as they suddenly started asking everyone about it after tons of silence from the press including Mike Pence as well.
https://youtu.be/GNI553Np__k
It is 100% that Trump is aware of the Q team.
Oh no, I remember that very well. He was asked what he thinks about the QANON movement. Which is a step in the right direction, but not quite where it needs to be. If they want it to be over one way or another, they need to directly ask, without all the soapboxing.
Asking questions like that, it only gets more people looking into it, and having to ask themselves, "Well, is it a bad thing to want to take down pedo rings?" Shot themselves in the foot with it, and didn't even follow it up with the old tried and true Oh Conservatives And Their Ridiculous ThInK oF tHe cHiLdRen line they normally do.
I guess - I mean I've followed it all losely but I don't get the obsession with that question. I know it seems "pointed" but it is kind of not a likely question from the media's point of view if you think about it.
There has not been any direct public vouching from any part of the government in terms of QAnon. So asking "Who is Q?" is skipping steps because it would be assuming it is widely accepted as the truth. If there were rumors of some crazy serial killer "The Fork" going around but no confirmed deaths from any real source would it make any sense for the press to go ask the local police station about "Who is The Fork?" not "What do you think about the rumors of The Fork?" or is "The Fork a conspiracy theory?".
You can't really pretend Trump's answer (even if it wasn't "the question") puts it solely on the media for not asking (if it was true). He answered it like a boss like usual but he definitely didn't add any credibility to it or say anything that would provoke the media to ask further.
If the media behaved in the way the media is supposed to behave, I'd absolutely agree with you. But these are the same people that screamed about Russia from the top of their lungs for years now based on a leak to Yahoo about a pee tape that doesn't exist, you know? They've thrown literally everything else at the President with the hope that it would stick, but this one thing is what they're going to try and do due diligence about?
I mean, it could be. God knows, looking at this year, weirder shit has happened. It just personally strikes me as really odd, that there's a three word question that they could ask, bluntly, and then not only get a shit ton of clicks on their dying websites, but would also do damage to the President no matter how he answered it.
Are you subbing over at our WIN?
I have not yet but I read stuff from you all every so often. I don't care for that board too much because half the time I've gone it has a bunch of shady links to be honest.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1310231624240500736.html
Sponsor: Rep. Malinowski, Tom [D-NJ-7] (Introduced 09/25/2020) THE DEMS ARE LITERALLY SHAKING>>>>CHICKEN TENDERS >>>ARE EVERYWHERE
All this for a LARP? π€
Sasquatch is next!
It sure would be nice for Q to deliver and vindicate people like myself, I'm sick and tired of believing in something and then looking like a fool afterwards.
My recommendation to you is that you never make predictions with dates, and most importantly, never accept victimhood.
Nothing says im guilty of unspeakable crimes more than introducing a Bill to condem a larp that says you (democrats) are guilty of unspeakable crimes! ππ
"D" Strike one. "NJ" Strike two
wikipedia
Strike three, you're out.
GreatAwakening.WIN