Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
This is why we will lose to the Left though if we are not more pro-active.
When the Left wants something they at least are pro-active about trying to get it done. Their methodology along the way is questionable at best, but they take action.
The Right often clearly wants something done and then they only talk about it, not enough action.
I do think peaceful protests towards some of these things are worth considering seriously.
A.) Draws attention to the matter.
B.) Provides contrast with rioting Democrat protests.
I agree. I would say that conservatives are at a disadvantage when it comes to this as we often have families that rely on us for financial/emotional support. Most leftists you see at these events don't even have jobs, let alone families, so they essentially have nothing to lose. I agree that we need to be involved more, it's just never going to be as easy for us unfortunately.
I think about what my grandfathers sacrificed in WWII and specifically D-Day and I'm ready. This shit is at our doorstep and I don't want it, but I'm ready and willing.
The Executive branch can't 'demand' anything of the Judicial branch. It's one of the core pillars of the separation of powers. Hence why GOP 'asks' the SCOTUS for a ruling.
The GOP is perfectly capable of rallying CITIZENS who can "demand" many things, specifically when they protest in front of the courthouse. Hence the entirety of my post, not just one word.
If the justices have zero disregard for the will of the people they are supposed to be representing when it comes to the application of laws, thats kind of an important thing to maybe get out in the open?
I have. I'm very familiar with the concept of separation of powers, despite what some people apparently think my statement shows a lack of. My question is, what part of the mail-in voter fraud would represent either the law or the will of the people? The consent of the governed being essential to the existence of a government, if I remember correctly?
So maybe I should ask have YOU read The Constitution?
They should pay attention to the will of the people. They are supposed to check the laws, and if Congress passed a law that went directly against the will of the people, the Courts obviously should serve as a check by overturning said law in order to preserve the union and avoid 1776 Part II.
Yep. The Left gets their way so much because they just go ahead and make it happen, and if we find out about it 6 months after the fact, they smugly grin at us and say "Yeah? And what are you cowards gonna do about it? Post some memes and be really mad?" and laugh as they do it again.
He can still choose who writes the opinion. All he has to do to fuck with us is get 1 lib to vote with the majority, and he can give the opinion to them.
The fact remains that blue states are mailing out ballots to people who don’t ask for them, are dead, don’t exist and then Commiefa drones run around and harvest those ballots to steal elections.
Because I'm going to be honest: He talks a big game about getting back into this to protect the integrity of the election, because the left's games have caused a rift in the country, yet he doesn't do anything about it.
We see so many things happening from the left, and nothing gets done.
Maybe this great experiment was a mistake. Maybe a monarchy really is the way to go, because at least they get to do something decisively.
Right, don't ask that our constitution be followed. Can you please stop using the bill of rights and our laws as toilet paper? Can you maybe stop transforming us into a socialist shit hole?
Holy shit if Trump gets to pick breyer, thomas, and sotomayor replacements in a second term that would be incredible. If something happens and roberts and kagan go away and we have a full Trump court, it would be nothing short of divine intervention.
Even worse, you know his days are numbered after the election win or lose. He's too much of a liability to keep around. His son is probably on the short list for Arkancide too. They'll pass without much fanfare just like Hillary's brother.
I don't have the source, but am pretty sure I saw the same conversation here. The poster made a credible argument based on the flight involved and the company involved of who the John Roberts likely was.
Eh, he'll be there for a while. Thomas has been there a long time and Sotomayor is in terrible health so those two will likely be the next to be replaced.
Roberts is surprising conservative on this type of issue. Remember, these rules were extended by the federal or state judiciary not the state legislature. Giving the courts this power to randomly extend the election date is a separation of powers issue, and he's very hesitant to grant courts new power. If there are 4 conservatives who vote to strike down these blatant abuses of power, Roberts will almost certainly side with them in order to avoid a 4-4 split.
Agreed. If something like Covid popped up the week before the election, courts could make the argument that there is no time for the state legislature to consider extending the deadlines.
That argument won't wash here. There has been ample time for legislatures to act if they chose to do so. If they choose not to act, it's not the court's place to do it for them.
Republicans: This election has overtaken the news, everyone is aware of it. There is no reason for late ballots, except for fraud. Send them early, its the law!
Democrats: According to this transblacksnowflakeweedeater professor, doing things on time is white privilege.
Roberts: Did you say snowflake/weed eater... Those are two different seasons... (Washington post does article critical of Roberts) The corrupt ones get it!
Why isnt the Pennsylvania legislature (controlled by GOP) having a hearing about this? Mark Levin talked about this on his show, according to federal law the state legislature sets the rules for the state's elections. They can declare the state Supreme Court's decision null and void without the Governor's signature.
The GOP is as bad as the Democrats in much of PA. Connor Lamb won because he was up against a bad, establishment Republican that never did anything and our Governor had the weakest opponent I'd ever seen. His ads were beyond pathetic and he was running on nothing. Lynn Swan should have won against Rendell, but rather than side with the Furious PA residents who were upset at bipartisan corruption and theft he fell in line and supported corrupt Republicans which gave away the biggest reason to vote for him.
There is so much happening in PA that it is difficult to pivot and condense all of the PA-GOP's focus on each issue. Governor Wolf has been attempting to force the State to participate in a "cap-and-trade" carbon taxing scheme (RGGI) that would destroy the oil, gas, and coal industry. His lockdown COVID orders are insane, but reliant on at least 2 pieces of legislation that have proven difficult to combat through legislative or judicial means. He vetoes literally everything, and democrats ALWAYS support his vetoes so overrides have proven impossible. It was thought that our election laws were safe because the law itself is pretty straightforward, but liberal judges have said that because PA laws don't explicitly disallow ballot collection boxes and extended timelines then they are totally kosher.
Honestly there is just a lot to fight all at once on multiple fronts. 12 months ago the legislature could have never imagined this much lawlessness and "reinterpretation" of century old tradition and practice. With each passing day it is looking like traditional legislative means to achieve democratic goals are becoming more and more worthless.
Wolf is the definition of emboldened. Almost as much as Whitmer, yet for some reason he doesn’t catch nearly enough flack from the public for his bull shit
Even when the PA GOP "has the votes" the Dems that initially voted in favor of a bill will switch their vote just to appease the Governor and enable the veto to succeed.
The Governor will be handed a bill, veto it, and then enact the language of the bill via executive order so that he can take all the credit. He's done that on a few occasions, most notably when he initially banned new construction because of COVID, a bill passed the legislature to re-allow construction, he vetoes it, and a few days later he puts out an order re-allowing construction in PA. Gov. Wolf is a tyrant.
Because the GOP are politicians. Nobody wants to stick their neck out, because they might lose their next race, and the governmental money train ends.
I've seen the same thing in every corporation I've worked in - having to sit through endless HR puppet shows about what we shouldn't do - all the while knowing managers and executives who do all of it, but nobody wants to stick their neck out, so they hunker down in their cubicles and don't say shit.
And, it's not unique to conservatives. Libs can speak out too - like when the DNC fucks over Bernie TWICE. Or when they run a senior citizen with dementia. Or when they install a literal whore who was the worst polling candidate in the primaries as VP.
Or maybe force Congress to get a bill voted on. Those sorry sacks in the GOP should be able to make hay considering the most recent Veritas video.
Such a sorry bunch that takes advantage of the elderly in such ways.
Sure, it will be a 4-4 split decision with Roberts disagreeing with the GOPs request. Roberts is a bought and paid for shill of the elites. He doesn't want those pedo tapes to get out of him pn the peso plane fucking kids.
Can't the POTUS declare insurrection, plain we have a coup going on and only accept absentee ballots and open the polls? We are technically at war against terrorism.
Republicans have been demanding voter ID for years with no results. In a matter of months, Democrats get vote by mail, late voting, dropboxes, and ballot harvesting just by asking. Absolute bullshit.
I’m sorry pedes but this Omar ballot harvesting has actually made me less confident. I mean we already knew she was corrupt. We know the Dems are going to cheat but I guess seeing Omar get CAUGHT red handed - on video- and still NOTHING happening to her leads me to believe nothing will ever happen to her nor the Dems who will inevitably cheat.
They will cheat the election then call trump a tyrant dictator refusing to leave office.
It’s kinda gotten me down in the dumps bc it’s clear that no amount of actual evidence of cheating will be enough. They can and do get away with whatever they want.
Democrats: Just do it, I don't care if it is illegal. Then the Republicans will have to stop us using courts which are generally stacked in our favor. And, we'll never have to face any penalties.
Republicans: Do what we are supposed to (generally) using traditional, ethical, and legal methods. We don't need to use the courts if we just follow the law.
....... who do you think wins that battle?
There is no more fighting proper. New rules. We win, they lose. FUCK them.
Supreme Court: Well OK but it will make no difference. Donald Trump is going to win in a landslide, and the idea that the Democrats can do what they didn't do in 2016 and steal the election makes no sense
PA is gone IMO, remember a year or so ago they redrew some districts to favor Dems in a general. They've been salty af about it going red last election. I think it'll be close enough that Dems steal it with the combination of these two things.
How about banning all mail in votes besides military absentee votes, nation wide? If you already voted by mail, make sure you show up in person because your mail in will not be counted. Oh, and BRING ID!
"accept ballots postmarked by Election Day, as long as they arrive within three days"
So if you submit it on November 3rd 23:59 EST it means we have to wait a long time before all the ballots are counted. I wonder if this rule applies for mailing your ballots from another state and timezone. If you send it from the west cost at 23:59 it is 4 hours after the polls close in Pennsylvania.
Seriously. Demand. Get people together and march on the capital.
Demands to SCOTUS go unheard.
This is why we will lose to the Left though if we are not more pro-active.
When the Left wants something they at least are pro-active about trying to get it done. Their methodology along the way is questionable at best, but they take action.
The Right often clearly wants something done and then they only talk about it, not enough action.
I do think peaceful protests towards some of these things are worth considering seriously.
A.) Draws attention to the matter.
B.) Provides contrast with rioting Democrat protests.
We’re winning with people but if fraud is allowed then that’s an issue. Must be stopped at all costs.
I agree. I would say that conservatives are at a disadvantage when it comes to this as we often have families that rely on us for financial/emotional support. Most leftists you see at these events don't even have jobs, let alone families, so they essentially have nothing to lose. I agree that we need to be involved more, it's just never going to be as easy for us unfortunately.
The left is bolstered by going unpunished.
The same thing doesn't happen to us.
So I assume when things break, they'll break hard.
I think about what my grandfathers sacrificed in WWII and specifically D-Day and I'm ready. This shit is at our doorstep and I don't want it, but I'm ready and willing.
The left itself is not proactive. The ultra wealthy people that are organizing the usefull idiots and giving them money are.
I think this is a very important point!
Like when do we have time to go to a protest? We all have jobs and work for a living.
The Executive branch can't 'demand' anything of the Judicial branch. It's one of the core pillars of the separation of powers. Hence why GOP 'asks' the SCOTUS for a ruling.
The GOP is perfectly capable of rallying CITIZENS who can "demand" many things, specifically when they protest in front of the courthouse. Hence the entirety of my post, not just one word.
What is a protest going to do? Justices are appointed for life. They don’t care (or shouldn’t) what anyone thinks.
If the justices have zero disregard for the will of the people they are supposed to be representing when it comes to the application of laws, thats kind of an important thing to maybe get out in the open?
They are not representatives. That’s what the House is for.
Have you ever read The Federalist Papers?
I have. I'm very familiar with the concept of separation of powers, despite what some people apparently think my statement shows a lack of. My question is, what part of the mail-in voter fraud would represent either the law or the will of the people? The consent of the governed being essential to the existence of a government, if I remember correctly?
So maybe I should ask have YOU read The Constitution?
They are supposed to have a regard for the will of the people as it is expressed in the laws passed by the people's elected representatives.
They are not supposed to pay attention to protests.
They should pay attention to the will of the people. They are supposed to check the laws, and if Congress passed a law that went directly against the will of the people, the Courts obviously should serve as a check by overturning said law in order to preserve the union and avoid 1776 Part II.
So make a EO declaring mail in voting is illegal to get the Democrats to sue and get the issue to SCOTUS
Weird I seem to recall Pelosi and Schiff demanding things from the Executive branch all the time.
The GOP in Pennsy is the legislative branch.
Yep. The Left gets their way so much because they just go ahead and make it happen, and if we find out about it 6 months after the fact, they smugly grin at us and say "Yeah? And what are you cowards gonna do about it? Post some memes and be really mad?" and laugh as they do it again.
John Roberts has entered the room.
so glad this pedo has been neutralized.
He can still choose who writes the opinion. All he has to do to fuck with us is get 1 lib to vote with the majority, and he can give the opinion to them.
The fact remains that blue states are mailing out ballots to people who don’t ask for them, are dead, don’t exist and then Commiefa drones run around and harvest those ballots to steal elections.
Meanwhile DOJ has a warm and smelly thumb
Why can't the GOP just cheat the system as well? We should be out there cheating bigly!
They already are and Barr needs to get on this.
Because I'm going to be honest: He talks a big game about getting back into this to protect the integrity of the election, because the left's games have caused a rift in the country, yet he doesn't do anything about it.
We see so many things happening from the left, and nothing gets done.
Maybe this great experiment was a mistake. Maybe a monarchy really is the way to go, because at least they get to do something decisively.
Right, don't ask that our constitution be followed. Can you please stop using the bill of rights and our laws as toilet paper? Can you maybe stop transforming us into a socialist shit hole?
We need to demand it, and fight for it
"Asked" was The Hill's word. It's not clear from the article how the GOP feels.
Roberts won't do shit if it might hurt the Democrats.
As far as I've heard she sees herself as constitutional originalist. Which is good.
I’ve heard this claim nonstop both here and reddit, and have yet to have anyone respond to me with evidence of support for BLM.
Do you have a source for that claim?
The one thing they do right.
Soon to be 6-1-2. Could even be 7-1-1. Don’T forget, Breyer is 82, and Sotomeyor is in bad health.
This! A million times THIS!!!
Kagan is the most conservative liberal too.
She did hire Kavanaugh.
Holy shit if Trump gets to pick breyer, thomas, and sotomayor replacements in a second term that would be incredible. If something happens and roberts and kagan go away and we have a full Trump court, it would be nothing short of divine intervention.
He'll be up next for replacement before too long. He's shady and associated with Epstein.
I joke with my wife that Joe Biden's punishment is literally running for president to death.
Even worse, you know his days are numbered after the election win or lose. He's too much of a liability to keep around. His son is probably on the short list for Arkancide too. They'll pass without much fanfare just like Hillary's brother.
Any goods they may have had on him lost their value when Ginsberg's death was acknowledged.
I don't agree with the guy's decisions, but it's not the same Roberts associated with Epstein.
How do you know?
Did we identify the John Roberts from the flight log?
Glad to hear it, but do you happen to have the source?
I don't have the source, but am pretty sure I saw the same conversation here. The poster made a credible argument based on the flight involved and the company involved of who the John Roberts likely was.
Eh, he'll be there for a while. Thomas has been there a long time and Sotomayor is in terrible health so those two will likely be the next to be replaced.
Breyer is no spring chicken, either.
while true, if he is even somewhat healthy he can have his staff do all his work for the foreseeable future like ginsburg.
doubt ruth has done any real work in years....
Thomas should retire before Nov. 3rd and have his replacement confirmed by Cocaine Mitch.
Roberts is surprising conservative on this type of issue. Remember, these rules were extended by the federal or state judiciary not the state legislature. Giving the courts this power to randomly extend the election date is a separation of powers issue, and he's very hesitant to grant courts new power. If there are 4 conservatives who vote to strike down these blatant abuses of power, Roberts will almost certainly side with them in order to avoid a 4-4 split.
Agreed. If something like Covid popped up the week before the election, courts could make the argument that there is no time for the state legislature to consider extending the deadlines.
That argument won't wash here. There has been ample time for legislatures to act if they chose to do so. If they choose not to act, it's not the court's place to do it for them.
Republicans: This election has overtaken the news, everyone is aware of it. There is no reason for late ballots, except for fraud. Send them early, its the law!
Democrats: According to this transblacksnowflakeweedeater professor, doing things on time is white privilege.
Roberts: Did you say snowflake/weed eater... Those are two different seasons... (Washington post does article critical of Roberts) The corrupt ones get it!
Why isnt the Pennsylvania legislature (controlled by GOP) having a hearing about this? Mark Levin talked about this on his show, according to federal law the state legislature sets the rules for the state's elections. They can declare the state Supreme Court's decision null and void without the Governor's signature.
Cuz they're fucking pussies or this is the uniparty in full effect.
The GOP is as bad as the Democrats in much of PA. Connor Lamb won because he was up against a bad, establishment Republican that never did anything and our Governor had the weakest opponent I'd ever seen. His ads were beyond pathetic and he was running on nothing. Lynn Swan should have won against Rendell, but rather than side with the Furious PA residents who were upset at bipartisan corruption and theft he fell in line and supported corrupt Republicans which gave away the biggest reason to vote for him.
There is so much happening in PA that it is difficult to pivot and condense all of the PA-GOP's focus on each issue. Governor Wolf has been attempting to force the State to participate in a "cap-and-trade" carbon taxing scheme (RGGI) that would destroy the oil, gas, and coal industry. His lockdown COVID orders are insane, but reliant on at least 2 pieces of legislation that have proven difficult to combat through legislative or judicial means. He vetoes literally everything, and democrats ALWAYS support his vetoes so overrides have proven impossible. It was thought that our election laws were safe because the law itself is pretty straightforward, but liberal judges have said that because PA laws don't explicitly disallow ballot collection boxes and extended timelines then they are totally kosher.
Honestly there is just a lot to fight all at once on multiple fronts. 12 months ago the legislature could have never imagined this much lawlessness and "reinterpretation" of century old tradition and practice. With each passing day it is looking like traditional legislative means to achieve democratic goals are becoming more and more worthless.
Tyrants need to be removed from power or it only gets worse. Tyrants should fear the people, or they only become more emboldened and more corrupt.
Wolf is the definition of emboldened. Almost as much as Whitmer, yet for some reason he doesn’t catch nearly enough flack from the public for his bull shit
The PA GOP doesn't have the votes to override vetos and the fucking governor vetos everything.
Even when the PA GOP "has the votes" the Dems that initially voted in favor of a bill will switch their vote just to appease the Governor and enable the veto to succeed.
The Governor will be handed a bill, veto it, and then enact the language of the bill via executive order so that he can take all the credit. He's done that on a few occasions, most notably when he initially banned new construction because of COVID, a bill passed the legislature to re-allow construction, he vetoes it, and a few days later he puts out an order re-allowing construction in PA. Gov. Wolf is a tyrant.
Your right. I’m hoping the only good that comes out of dictator Wolf’s actions is a landslide in November.
Because the GOP are politicians. Nobody wants to stick their neck out, because they might lose their next race, and the governmental money train ends.
I've seen the same thing in every corporation I've worked in - having to sit through endless HR puppet shows about what we shouldn't do - all the while knowing managers and executives who do all of it, but nobody wants to stick their neck out, so they hunker down in their cubicles and don't say shit.
And, it's not unique to conservatives. Libs can speak out too - like when the DNC fucks over Bernie TWICE. Or when they run a senior citizen with dementia. Or when they install a literal whore who was the worst polling candidate in the primaries as VP.
I honestly don't understand why the mail deadline isn't October 3rd.. if you're too much of a sheep to vote in person you dont deserve an extension
ask? FUCKING DEMAND!
EO to make extensions and ballot harvesting illegal in Federal elections.
Why? Fed judge would just pop up outta nowhere and stall it till after the ... when ever.
Hawaiian Judge entered the chat
Or maybe force Congress to get a bill voted on. Those sorry sacks in the GOP should be able to make hay considering the most recent Veritas video. Such a sorry bunch that takes advantage of the elderly in such ways.
Crazy ... either way we can’t let States change Federal election timelines... clown fucking world people
B-b-but they m-m-m-ight c-c-call us D-D-DICK TATERS!!!!!
But what about muh morality and taking the high road!
There is no legal distinction between asking and demanding. It's not like you type your filings in capital letters when you're DEMANDING.
Sure, it will be a 4-4 split decision with Roberts disagreeing with the GOPs request. Roberts is a bought and paid for shill of the elites. He doesn't want those pedo tapes to get out of him pn the peso plane fucking kids.
Why do they allow voting after election day? If that'd the case let's just vote 24/7! Idiots
Lost me at “extension”. Mail in voting is a plague that will make fake COVID look like the common cold that it is
Too early to do that, it's a 4-4 court. They're just going to kick it back.
How can they? It's time sensitive to say the least. There's no rule that says a 4-4 court can't vote. SCOTUS minus Scalia decided several cases.
The 4-4 court will vote, it'll be 4-4, and the lower court's decision will stand.
Ah, gotcha. I thought you were saying they wouldn't consider the case. But it's not guaranteed to be 4-4. Although with Roberts, ugh.
Still, three days/must be postmarked by Election Day isn't the worst outcome.
Can't the POTUS declare insurrection, plain we have a coup going on and only accept absentee ballots and open the polls? We are technically at war against terrorism.
Republicans have been demanding voter ID for years with no results. In a matter of months, Democrats get vote by mail, late voting, dropboxes, and ballot harvesting just by asking. Absolute bullshit.
Did they send a strongly-worded letter?
John Roberts, We are watching.
Okay and what if they say no?
I’m sorry pedes but this Omar ballot harvesting has actually made me less confident. I mean we already knew she was corrupt. We know the Dems are going to cheat but I guess seeing Omar get CAUGHT red handed - on video- and still NOTHING happening to her leads me to believe nothing will ever happen to her nor the Dems who will inevitably cheat.
They will cheat the election then call trump a tyrant dictator refusing to leave office.
It’s kinda gotten me down in the dumps bc it’s clear that no amount of actual evidence of cheating will be enough. They can and do get away with whatever they want.
they will call him hitler anyway, he may as well literally start holocausting leftists, and then at least what they say about him will be true
I know but...I mean we know they are going to cheat massively. We know this.
So what happens when they do cheat massively?
Will the public/ supporters at least know? Meaning... will he have backing and support to contest the supposed “results”?
I’m just very curious and pessimistic (in a way) as to what happens when Dems all of a sudden find a way to win the election.
Then what? Are you confident that Trump will still win?
I don't know why you were downvoted here, if this doesn't result in legal action then they can do anything they want.
Exactly... and people will say you’re a concern troll for pointing this out yet offer absolutely no answer or refute.
DO IT IN EVERY STATE
DO IT NOW
Democrats: Just do it, I don't care if it is illegal. Then the Republicans will have to stop us using courts which are generally stacked in our favor. And, we'll never have to face any penalties.
Republicans: Do what we are supposed to (generally) using traditional, ethical, and legal methods. We don't need to use the courts if we just follow the law.
....... who do you think wins that battle?
There is no more fighting proper. New rules. We win, they lose. FUCK them.
Put ACB on the bench
Make them say to the Supreme Court that the need the ability to cheat.
Turns out RBG also told her grandaughter one more thing before she kicked the bucket...
"Whatever you do.... dont... let..... them...... stop the.... voting..... extension... eeeeeeeeggghhh"
Supreme Court: Well OK but it will make no difference. Donald Trump is going to win in a landslide, and the idea that the Democrats can do what they didn't do in 2016 and steal the election makes no sense
Can they wait and ask again in about a month?
Demand this shit, don't ask... Don't be polite... This is absolute BS
?? Confirm Amy then ask. Morons!
Worth a shot right? Not with Roberts there.
PA is gone IMO, remember a year or so ago they redrew some districts to favor Dems in a general. They've been salty af about it going red last election. I think it'll be close enough that Dems steal it with the combination of these two things.
What is the status with us Californians?
Now do WI, MI, and NC.
John Roberts suspiciously seen wearing a lace collar
Demand it or we'll burn the country down - democrat way?
How about banning all mail in votes besides military absentee votes, nation wide? If you already voted by mail, make sure you show up in person because your mail in will not be counted. Oh, and BRING ID!
Gop: Hey can you please and I mean pretty please respect our electoral process:) I'll be you're best friend
No and fuck off.
Understandable have a nice day
FILL THAT FUCKIN SEAT
"accept ballots postmarked by Election Day, as long as they arrive within three days"
So if you submit it on November 3rd 23:59 EST it means we have to wait a long time before all the ballots are counted. I wonder if this rule applies for mailing your ballots from another state and timezone. If you send it from the west cost at 23:59 it is 4 hours after the polls close in Pennsylvania.
This is why I don't get why they are taking their sweet time to confirm Amy. Hold hearings TODAY. Have her confirmed by Friday
Now do California. They’re collecting ballots up to 2 weeks after the election....
Doesnt this hinder the ballots from the military and other "misplaced" ballots?
They are doing the same for the extra week of early voting in Texas.
Demand a Fair Election.
Watch the Democrats insist that Ruth get a vote until replaced!
It was another dying wish of hers!
Well, if the dems feel that she can still vote in the election when she's dead, they must certainly feel she can still vote in the SC as well.