She'd be an interesting addition to the FEC as a Democrat seeing as we don't have a quorum and haven't since July making the commission completely useless during the most hectic election in US history. Probably by Democrat design...
The only thing we have in common with Tulsi is our general hatred of the DNC. Which is weird because despite being the DNC outcast, her platform is basically lock step with the radical Dems.
This is the right way to be. We judge legislation by its policy and we judge people by their record. A legislator with a bad record is not incapable of getting it right some point down the line.
We can celebrate this bill without forgetting her position on 2A.
By design of our system, the states have massive leeway over how to hold their elections. Unfortunately, this is probably the most authority that Congress can constitutionally assert in this situation.
Edit: for a source on constitutionality here, first: The federal government cannot force states to enact certain laws (non-delegation principle) but they can attach strings to funding.
Second: Congress cannot determine how the states select their Electors. Article II of the Constitution.
True, but the congress also black letter picks election day, which must be one day throughout the United States - not a month, or 2 weeks after the day designated by congress, or as long after it as any federal judge shall individually allow. Because the founders were not idiots and knew that elections spread out through time were an invitation to multiple voting fraud.
Also, if an election is so contested that it is thrown into the House, states get only 1 vote each from their entire delegation - so CA and NY are each only worth the same as WY or MT. As usual, the commies haven't thought any of this through.
I was under the impression ballot harvesting is flat out illegal but hadn't been tested; since a rando 3rd party gets custody of the ballet...I know some states have allowed it--maybe Omar's criminal activity will tip the scales to ban it!
States have massive leeway over elections by design of the constitution. The federal government cannot force states to enact certain laws (non-delegation principle) but they can attach strings to funding.
Yeah, but if we can find issues like this that we actually agree on maybe we can get a few issues fixed. It's a move in the right direction. We don't have to agree on everything, or even most things, to make our country better.
Are you interested in suppressing the mention of certain people's names and actions? Are you upset and angry that other people do so? Then you might be a Democrat. Seek help.
Nope. We'll get a lot farther by working with people we disagree with on the few issues where we do agree. Doesn't mean we have to like them or agree on other things. Banning is for leftists.
How about we praise the good things people do and condem the bad?
I am sick of people complaining about Tulsi. Yes, we know she is a Democrat. But she is better than some of the RINOs in our own party.
She'd be an interesting addition to the FEC as a Democrat seeing as we don't have a quorum and haven't since July making the commission completely useless during the most hectic election in US history. Probably by Democrat design...
Come to the MAGA side Tulsi!
The only thing we have in common with Tulsi is our general hatred of the DNC. Which is weird because despite being the DNC outcast, her platform is basically lock step with the radical Dems.
She’s not running for anything and won’t be on the ballot when her term is up. Let he fuck with the DNC all she wants.
This is the right way to be. We judge legislation by its policy and we judge people by their record. A legislator with a bad record is not incapable of getting it right some point down the line.
We can celebrate this bill without forgetting her position on 2A.
You have a better chance of passing a bill with shit stains on it in the House
Jerry Nadler left the discussion
LOL
slowly and with extremely small steps to try to stop the spread.
Defund hell. Don't count their electoral votes. And don't seat their congressmen.
By design of our system, the states have massive leeway over how to hold their elections. Unfortunately, this is probably the most authority that Congress can constitutionally assert in this situation.
Edit: for a source on constitutionality here, first: The federal government cannot force states to enact certain laws (non-delegation principle) but they can attach strings to funding.
Second: Congress cannot determine how the states select their Electors. Article II of the Constitution.
True, but the congress also black letter picks election day, which must be one day throughout the United States - not a month, or 2 weeks after the day designated by congress, or as long after it as any federal judge shall individually allow. Because the founders were not idiots and knew that elections spread out through time were an invitation to multiple voting fraud.
Also, if an election is so contested that it is thrown into the House, states get only 1 vote each from their entire delegation - so CA and NY are each only worth the same as WY or MT. As usual, the commies haven't thought any of this through.
Wow a dem with more balls than the entire GOP.
Please
mommy milkers
I was under the impression ballot harvesting is flat out illegal but hadn't been tested; since a rando 3rd party gets custody of the ballet...I know some states have allowed it--maybe Omar's criminal activity will tip the scales to ban it!
States have massive leeway over elections by design of the constitution. The federal government cannot force states to enact certain laws (non-delegation principle) but they can attach strings to funding.
She's too beautiful and hate-free to be a leftist.
She's still a gun-grabbing commie.
Yeah, but if we can find issues like this that we actually agree on maybe we can get a few issues fixed. It's a move in the right direction. We don't have to agree on everything, or even most things, to make our country better.
That's totally fine, but every time Tulsi agrees with us on something, it turns into a massive simp-fest. Just trying to preempt some of that.
Enforce existing laws.
No WAY she's just exploiting our penises for support guise! She's REALLY coming over to our side this time!!
Oughtta be an instaban for posting anything from this bitch on this site.
I didn't say she's coming over to our side. She's not running for re-election, so I'm not sure what support she's looking for.
I like the legislative proposal and I indicated who proposed it. Don't be censorious
Are you interested in suppressing the mention of certain people's names and actions? Are you upset and angry that other people do so? Then you might be a Democrat. Seek help.
Fuck off, Fonebone. You've called just about every one on this site a troll by now, every time you disagree with someone.
Oh, you wanna censor me too? Thanks for proving my point! "HoW DaRe U cRitiCize Me! SiLenCE Ur SeLf!"
Nope. We'll get a lot farther by working with people we disagree with on the few issues where we do agree. Doesn't mean we have to like them or agree on other things. Banning is for leftists.