From the beginning, the WRONG TESTS have been used. They are FAR TOO SPECIFIC and yield 90%+ positives where the infected is not infectious. Of course, these tests are $100+ a piece, where the far less specific but in a pandemic are far more relevant cost < $1 a piece. These paper tests show positive only when the person is actually infectious.
Consider now that thousands of labs worldwide have live virus samples and these can be turned around and released to reinfect as needed to push the narrative.
From the beginning, the WRONG TESTS have been used. They are FAR TOO SPECIFIC and yield 90%+ positives where the infected is not infectious. Of course, these tests are $100+ a piece, where the far less specific but in a pandemic are far more relevant cost < $1 a piece. These paper tests show positive only when the person is actually infectious.
Hopefully sanity prevails at some point.
That, and you cannot convince me otherwise that the "tests" themselves were responsible for actually infecting people.
early on that is very plausible imo.
Consider now that thousands of labs worldwide have live virus samples and these can be turned around and released to reinfect as needed to push the narrative.