So Durham and Barr have nixed the idea of announcing any indictments ( doubtful that any are pending) before the election because they don't want them to appear politically motivated.
Wait a fucking second! If people of the other party are suspected of serious crimes shouldn't that be made known before we vote not after? Shouldn't we have the opportunity to not elect someone that is corrupt instead of trying to undo it after they assume power?
To me, not exposing corruption before we vote is a dereliction of duty. So sick of this shit and doubletalk.
I think the question of whether it's worth risking losing the election over the indictments when there is a high chance of reelection right now. Rushing could cost us everything.
Make no mistake here, I want justice as much as any pede here, and honestly question Barr's commitment to such. Indictments today would not result in conviction before the election and if it caused enough people to swing against Trump from all the hysterical media reports of arresting his political opponents that it resulted in a loss, the new AG would be definitely drop all the cases and declare them exonerated no matter the evidence.
There is also the old line about "if you go after the king, you best not miss." Understand that for all the lines about being a dictator, Trump isn't the King in this scenario. You only get one chance at people like Soros and other power brokers and you absolutely can't fuck it up. It's gotta be flawless or they walk.
So Durham and Barr have nixed the idea of announcing any indictments ( doubtful that any are pending) before the election because they don't want them to appear politically motivated. Wait a fucking second! If people of the other party are suspected of serious crimes shouldn't that be made known before we vote not after? Shouldn't we have the opportunity to not elect someone that is corrupt instead of trying to undo it after they assume power?
To me, not exposing corruption before we vote is a dereliction of duty. So sick of this shit and doubletalk.
Well, not if 70% of those in the government are going to be arrested.
Better wait until a new crop comes in.
We know we'll have the same president.
I think the question of whether it's worth risking losing the election over the indictments when there is a high chance of reelection right now. Rushing could cost us everything.
Make no mistake here, I want justice as much as any pede here, and honestly question Barr's commitment to such. Indictments today would not result in conviction before the election and if it caused enough people to swing against Trump from all the hysterical media reports of arresting his political opponents that it resulted in a loss, the new AG would be definitely drop all the cases and declare them exonerated no matter the evidence.
There is also the old line about "if you go after the king, you best not miss." Understand that for all the lines about being a dictator, Trump isn't the King in this scenario. You only get one chance at people like Soros and other power brokers and you absolutely can't fuck it up. It's gotta be flawless or they walk.