35
posted ago by Redditiscucked2 +35 / -0

So i've been hearing this prochoice more and more and been seeing people on the opposite side just going along with it and forwarding their own prolife thing.

This is a big mistake. By letting prochoice wording slide, you're already acknowledging it has some inherent value, logic or truth to it. Just by letting it slide and engaging in the discussion makes them win some ground. And it puts you in the position of fighting against women having choices.

The thing is that prochoice is an inherently flawed position.

It implies women have NO choice in pregnancy and that they should have (and yes, they definitely should have). And therein lies the problem. Women DO have a choice. With very few exceptions like rape, women already have 100% control over their bodies.

The only way the prochoice argument would hold water would be if women would RANDOMLY get pregnant. Then and only then they would "not have control over their bodies".

But as we all know babies come from unprotected PIV. Women have plenty of choices to avoid that, from using protection to just not having piv.

So please, whenever you get into an argument, don't just skip over "prochoice" wording because it's is simply wrong and puts you in a very bad and defensive (yet false) position of taking choice away from women.

It's obviously absurd but if you don't attack it's premise you will by default become the one that wants women not to have choices.

Comments (11)
sorted by:
6
gnomenclature 6 points ago +6 / -0

The choice should be at the point before conception. She doesn't want a child? She either abstains, uses effective birth control, or engages in sexual activity other than intercourse. It's really not that hard. But the far left considers women morons.

3
Redditiscucked2 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is true, i'm just pointing out that letting the prochoice thing slide puts you in a bad position because it implies you oppose women having a choice.

It's obviously absurd but if you don't attack it's premise you will by default become the one that wants women not to have choices.

-1
TheImpossible1 -1 points ago +1 / -2

How many choices do women allow men to have?

Who cares what they think.

5
FUSnowflake 5 points ago +6 / -1

If women have abortion on demand "My body my choice" then men should not have to pay child support.

0
TheImpossible1 0 points ago +1 / -1

Even a conservative Supreme Court wouldn't give this one.

3
FUSnowflake 3 points ago +3 / -0

...the way to stop a "pro-abort feminist" in her tracks, with one question.

"Did Monica Lewinsky get pregnant?"

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
0
TheImpossible1 0 points ago +1 / -1

Your first mistake is believing they didn't wish to get pregnant.

The idea in their heads is that getting pregnant will lock down a man for them - those who have men that correctly leave because they didn't want a child, decide to abort.

0
TheImpossible1 0 points ago +1 / -1

Nah, pro-choice should be our name.

They get the same choice as a man does. Pay up or go to jail.

1
FLWoman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sounds like YOU made some bad choices in women.

1
TheImpossible1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nope, but thanks for playing!