2478
posted ago by AngryAsian ago by AngryAsian +2478 / -0

-George Orwell, 1984...he called it in terms of who would be screaming the loudest in an attempt to destroy the USA

Comments (139)
sorted by:
127
remindmelater 127 points ago +129 / -2

It used to be that only property owners were allowed to vote...probably for this very reason....voting for "feelings"...

38
IncredibleMrE1 38 points ago +41 / -3

Hard facts.

23
MajJamesMcFarlane 23 points ago +24 / -1

Trufax

23
proDeoEtPatria 23 points ago +23 / -0

Biden is up among women in PA, WI, and MI all carried by Trump in 2016. Trump is up in all three states with men... but Biden is apparently leading because women turn out is going to be higher than 2016.

Biden is the party of arson, riots and violence. Insane to think women are voting for this.

7
ServerTowerofBabel 7 points ago +7 / -0

Herd facts

10
nomoreprinkles 10 points ago +10 / -0

They cared cause they had some skin in the game. Most of the young voters today don't even plan on being alive in the country 5 years from now.

8
Furaffinitydotnet 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yeah and the 3/5ths compromise makes no mention of race except to exempt untaxed Indians.

Maybe it should be applied in the context of taxes or at least in the context of welfare programs.

There will arise a point where there are more people paying nothing than people paying into it, but that won't stop them from voting for more and more of the producers earnings.

3
no_step_on_snek 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yup, used to be that only property owners paid any taxes too.

83
awooo 83 points ago +84 / -1

Cancel culture is just the mean girls from high school.

74
deleted 74 points ago +75 / -1
14
Pepbrandt 14 points ago +15 / -1

Bulls eye.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
10
MegaMagaManX 10 points ago +10 / -0

There's tons of attractive brats all over social media perpetuating "woke" TDS, BLM, RGB etc... Orwell was right!

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
61
AsaNisiMAGA 61 points ago +64 / -3

He was writing, In highly fictionalized form, about the Soviets. He wasn't predicting the future, he was writing about contemporaneous events. 1984 = 1948. Get it? That said, some things never change.

75
AngryAsian [S] 75 points ago +77 / -2

I mean, he was right about women being the easiest to indoctrinate and turn into screaming hysterical morons

79
AsaNisiMAGA 79 points ago +79 / -0

Because he had seen it happen. It never worked on me, but I'm a weirdo. I think because I always had strong men in my life, my dad and my friends. No one coddled me. They just told me to get back on my bike and hurry the fuck up. And some of it is modern culture. There are plenty of weak, hysterical men these days too. Because it is encouraged. It's a real turn off and they're everywhere.

21
SqueekyCleanBurisma 21 points ago +21 / -0

Yup somehow “acknowledging mental health issues in young men” (which is a good thing tbh) became a free ride to be a fucking soy boy nut.

15
shadypollster 15 points ago +17 / -2

Cultural Marixsm targets women because bad women make bad men.

12
sentient-potato 12 points ago +13 / -1

That implies men are even weaker than women, to be led so easily.

Ideology seeps into PEOPLE, sex is irrelevant.

18
gamephreak5 18 points ago +18 / -0

Ask Adam why he followed Eve so easily in eating the forbidden fruit when he knew full well what the consequences would be.

23
JediMasterGandalf 23 points ago +23 / -0

Boobs.

20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
9
shadypollster 9 points ago +12 / -3

Nope its because mothers are the first teachers.

9
sentient-potato 9 points ago +9 / -0

Jeez, I guess I'll spell it out for you: If men were present, there would be a balance.

Mothers AND fathers are the first teachers. If men choose to walk away from their families, it becomes awfully convenient to blame the women.

9
Wankerton 9 points ago +10 / -1

I mean choosing to walk away when the woman benefits from divorcing you and getting alimony and or daddy government’s entitlements....

Sure a man can walk away and thats not a good thing. But most of the time it’s the woman.

4
shadypollster 4 points ago +4 / -0

No need to get snippy. Both genders are under attack.

4
AngryAsian [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

I mean it's true, women rule men and men rule the world

4
AngryAsian [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

What's really fucked is all the "poly" couples out there. Hey we're partnered, but we cheat on each other all the time. That's literally the most depressing thing I've seen in my life. Sure there used to be that sort of thing in the 70's but it makes me so sad for young people, it's so depressing.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
AsaNisiMAGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Swingers and swappers in the 1970s were partnered but bored or thrill seeking. The ones now only have the illusion of being partnered. They can tell the world, and more importantly themselves, that they are desirable to someone. But the truth is obvious. And sad.

47
lo_there 47 points ago +49 / -2

They are biologically wired to immediately adjust views to who they think has power. It's a survival response formed over hundreds of thousands of years. You flip social media and Hollywood to suddenly push right wing material and they'd be supporting that in a couple weeks.

24
_Sully_ 24 points ago +26 / -2

When conquered they wanted to make sure they can get in on the new meat that defeated their countrymen. The bad boys.

6
commies0ride0free 6 points ago +6 / -0

More like “let me conform so I’ll be accepted and not outcasted or killed”

2
Deaduponaviral 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ie. Dutch, French, Polish women in occupied Germany, and eventually German women after WWII. To the victor go the spoils.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
8
knightofday 8 points ago +10 / -2

Hard facts

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
46
CisSiberianOrchestra 46 points ago +48 / -2

Rush Limbaugh has talked about this. He's said that he's seen it happen in person: parents send their daughter off to college, and when she comes back home she's been radicalized. Her parents are too afraid to argue with her. And in the end the daughter ends up indoctrinating her parents. Rush said it's happened to a few friends of his.

25
TonyGucciano 25 points ago +25 / -0

watching it happen in my family. 2 weeks in college and she's posting her pronouns. She has a weak TDS father

16
knightofday 16 points ago +16 / -0

That’s some sad shit, damn

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
4
CatoWasRight 4 points ago +4 / -0

He was recognizing the trends and patterns that lead to the phenomenon we know as socialism. If you read atlas shrugged it has very similar plot lines, because Cultural phenomenons are often caused by similar cultural and economic factors, they may have different names throughout history but the patterns remain similar. For example women tend to be the cause and proponents of hysteria throughout history, largly due to their group approval mentality, see our modern mask Karen. There is an excellent book on this called "the fate of empires" by sir john glubb, it's fairly short I highly recommend it. Here's a free PDF https://www.docdroid.net/5CdrehR/the-fate-of-empires-by-sir-john-glubb-pdf

32
Magentapede 32 points ago +34 / -2

Funny how a demographic that is biologically pre-dispositioned to having a greater emotional response is more easily lead around by its emotions.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
28
Barack-Obama2 28 points ago +28 / -0

It's not just the women who do a lot of swallowing. Trust me. ;)

8
JediMasterGandalf 8 points ago +8 / -0

Username checks out.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
25
dukeofdoorcounty 25 points ago +26 / -1

Well they sure got suckered into their own destruction by supporting BLM

17
Gold-Eyed-Cat 17 points ago +24 / -7

YAY. Another post blaming women. In 2016, 52% of white women voted Trump. I've been MAGA my entire life. My dad got me a .410 for my ninth birthday. My girlfriends and I ridiculed our commie college professors. The most liberal teachers all wanted to fuck us so bad it was comical.

 

Instead of focusing on women, blame commies like Soros and the Chi-com bastards for exploiting America's low IQ, insecure, emotional citizens. Anyone they can lure into victimhood is a target INCLUDING "feminists". But also including blacks, gays, soy-boys, etc. Anyone with a weak mind is prey.

 

I ADORE our alpha male patriots. I hate that masculinity is being attacked. And Orwell wrote great fiction. Just try not to make this a Man vs Woman thing. It's not.

14
sentient-potato 14 points ago +16 / -2

Same here. I uphold masculinity in our MAGA pedes, I cannot stand soy morons but I also will not allow this site to devolve into a woman-bashing one.

5
commies0ride0free 5 points ago +5 / -0

Me too. I am very far to the right of a lot of men I know personally. I was raised as a hard, liberty loving conservative, constantly lectured about the horrors of communism, and had instilled the values of hard work and personal responsibility. My husband is a scary, alpha, conservative man and we raise our Christian children to have critical thinking and high character. It takes BOTH of us and I appreciate the roles both of us play, and it will take both men and women to keep this country going on the track of being the strongest nation of all history. But sure, let’s blame women for the commies.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
5
GoldenSpirals 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don't see it as an attack or blame. I see it as a warning that many of them are easily manipulated and particularly vicious when activated as mind slaves.

1
Gold-Eyed-Cat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes! Weak minded, insecure people they can manipulate. ALL sexes, races religions.

5
Cuzyoudbeinjail 5 points ago +10 / -5

Too bad they're all not like you. But there is something to be said about how young women are easily manipulated. Especially ones with no father figure or strong familial bonds. Also beta males are worse than women, they actually have to try and be cucks it's not natural.

4
commies0ride0free 4 points ago +4 / -0

They’re not all like her.

But there are literally 10’s if millions who are.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
AngryAsian [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Unfortunately, like most women, you're misinformed...70 percent of women born after 1980 favor Democrats, while only 23 percent identify as Republicans. And the stat you are citing comes from exit polls which over-represent the people who are willing to stop and talk to a pollster. So while there's plenty of men to blame like Soros or Obama bin Laden or Big Mike Obama, the fact is that there's LARGE segment of women who they've succeeded in indoctrinating. Probably starting in the 90's with the dumbing down of the American education system for No Child Left Behind.

Citation: https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2018/03/20/wide-gender-gap-growing-educational-divide-in-voters-party-identification/

1
Gold-Eyed-Cat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why the qualifiers on age? Trump needed women to win in 2016 and will need them again in 2020. You better hope YOU are misinformed.

 

Look at all these Dem "women" trying to destroy America:

George Soros, and Bill Gates, and Obama, Biden, Brennan, Stzok, McCain, Romney, Reid, Kerry, Shumer, Cummings, Bloomberg, Zuckerberg, Podesta, Bill Clinton, Bezos, Jack Dorsey, John Roberts.

 

Look at all these Dem "men" trying to destroy America:

Ilhan, Hillary, Pilosi, AOC, Huma, Valerie Jarrett, Pressley, Rashida Tlaib, Feinstein, Lee, Page, RGB.

 

There are plenty of socialists trying to take over America. Making this about MEN against WOMEN is unproductive and exactly what THEY have encouraged to keep us weak and divided.

 

And I got my "misinformed" 52% women Trump voters from... President Donald Trump. I guess he doesn't use age qualifiers.

 

(Edited to add 2016 chart from crappy msm. We voted AGAINST a woman! No need to trash ladies! Most are MAGA. Even more now!) https://i.maga.host/i7ANZQt.png

 

We NEED each other. MAGA ON! :)

15
Chopblock 15 points ago +17 / -2

Thanks to choices unwittingly made by women themselves, the next generation of girls are likely doomed to becoming a fully subservient class — except instead of the submission to corporate tech/TV propaganda demonstrated by today’s ‘feminists’, their daughters will be submitting to either Muslim jihadis, multinational sex-slavers, or ‘far-right’ Patriarchs.

The experiment of women’s suffrage will die with a whimper, and women will also have forfeited the special protected status they once held

11
3
MadRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

The moment the American civilization took the poison pill.

10
Chopblock 10 points ago +12 / -2

“CREATURES OF THE ZEITGEIST”: “She is forever guilty and therefore cannot be emotionally stable. In her obedience to the coercive thought reform of the education establishment, she has surrendered the right to think independently...”

(See links in comments showing how social media tech mirrors cult indoctrination effects on girls.)

https://thedonald.win/p/GbfTtufp/creatures-of-the-zeitgeist-she-i/c/

Making a Demoralized Signal-Zombie, step-by-step:

  • Tech-mediated social media demoralization

  • Institutionalism, indoctrination, and reality-detachment

  • Mass media Orwellian ‘two-minutes hate’ inundation

  • Isolation through censorship, and gaslighting

  • Dehumanization propaganda and narcissistic reinforcement

  • Antisocial Behavior modeling and linguistic detachment

  • Sloganeering, dichotomies, and group-enforced thought control

  • Radicalization and political power structure subjugation

  • Emotional contagion and hysteria induction

  • Situational Escalation and individualized triggering

  • Weapons delivery and material support

  • Removal of legal and cultural behavior-freezing processes

  • Disavowal, abandonment, or elimination

8
Pepbrandt 8 points ago +8 / -0

Michael Savage is always saying that it was the young girls who fanned the flames of the witch trials.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
5
CaliChica 5 points ago +15 / -10

What’s up with all the women hate and blame lately on this board. Pretty disappointing.

Majority of the mess we are in is because of men like Soros, Comey, Brennan, Bill Clinton, Bush & the Obamas.

19
Chopblock 19 points ago +20 / -1

Because it’s a problem we have to fix, from one end or the other. Just like a slew of disaffected young males breeds societal violence, crime, and war, a surfeit of indoctrinated women leads to civilization decay, collapse, and overthrow.

The big tech tools of indoctrination are particularly effective at turning women’s historically-beneficial cognitive tendencies and social sensitivity adaptations into liabilities, and along with some particularly nasty strains of perverse incentive feedback loops and embedded cultural ideas, have effected a devastation on women’s lives and unleashed a violent, hysterical army of dangerously ignorant, shrieking harpies that is having a large impact on our government and civic institutions.

8
18-to-life 8 points ago +9 / -1

I think the point is that our women could take their men in any type of confrontation. Why hate on women in general when we can hate on -Leftist women- and be much more accurate.

1
sentient-potato 1 point ago +8 / -7

The female hate here is strong and it's usually done by men wearing blinders, who refuse to take a look at men's roles in all of this.

3
Chopblock 3 points ago +7 / -4

‘Pedes hardly ‘hate’ women. If anything they tend towards trying to believe and achieve an idealistic notion of the female persona: moral center of the family (retro-family illustration memes), Randian professional achiever (McEnany, ACB, Kellyanne Conway, Ivanka, Melanie, etc.) fun cheerleader and thought leader to the civic discourse (‘Trump Girls’, Diamond & Silk, etc.), innocent beauty (‘families’, ‘metoo’ comparisons, ‘feminism destroys’ memes) and ‘sexy’ prop-wielder (‘Gun girls’, ‘Hotties for Trump’, ‘real women’, etc.).

You can certainly find a bit of the same old contradictions and projections that have been part of the ‘feminine mystique’ for millennia... but little if any hate.

It’s the Left that hates women, and is out to degrade, demean, exploit, mutate, control, paternalisticly subject, trigger into hysterics, and redefine them of existence.

2
sentient-potato 2 points ago +4 / -2

I've seen a LOT of degrading posts about women here, and it's a shame.

We can talk about the left all day long, and I do agree with that, but if the alternative is to come here and hear how women are weak, emotional, ruin countries and children...then we're no better.

5
Chopblock 5 points ago +5 / -0

Where’s the examples of these degrading posts with high updoots?

Setting politically-incorrect ideas ‘off-limits’ is a thought control tactic of the left. There is real problem stemming from factually-ignorant, emotional-contagion induced hysterical young women being radicalized into violent, useful idiots into a riotous, military-style planned color revolution-style insurrection. Not talking about it isn’t going to fix it, or reverse its disastrous effects for our country or for women themselves.

0
sentient-potato 0 points ago +1 / -1

You're in one, for starts.

This particular quote has been reposted 5 times with two well over a thousand updoots: https://thedonald.win/search?params=always+the+women

3
Chopblock 3 points ago +3 / -0

Except I have articulated why the concept underlying this thread is both reasonably accurate, sufficiently relevant to predicate good discussion, and NOT misogynistic.

Just as accurately discussing racial disparities in murder rates isn’t de facto racism, or rightly pointing out that foreign countries attempt to ‘dump’ their murderers and rapists into emigration avenues where they become America’s illegal immigrant problem isn’t ‘calling all Mexicans rapists’.

9
knightofday 9 points ago +12 / -3

Not women hate per day, just point out the very real fact that women tend to take to the conditioning extra hard. That’s why we see armies of liberal goes marching for BLM and their own destruction.

6
sentient-potato 6 points ago +8 / -2

Thousands of men have been rioting. Is it just that you're looking to point out the women joining them?

Because without the massive male numbers, that BLM movements and the riots would not be where they are now.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
sentient-potato 2 points ago +3 / -1

You realize that men have a choice to walk away from their children, right? Blaming single mothers is convenient when you don't have to address why those kids are fatherless in the first place.

My point is that people are emotional. People are led by ideology. I'm tired of this woman-bashing on here, we're better than that.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
sentient-potato 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree that what's happened to men's rights today is egregious. 100%. I don't think either sex should be able to game the system, or have more rights in the system.

But as often as this topic comes up, the single mother issue is blamed and it's astonishing to me how easily that's thrown around while at the same time paternal responsibility is ignored. The government wouldn't have as much control over women, or have the ability to give them the money (and brainwash them) as they do if the men just stuck around.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
sentient-potato 2 points ago +4 / -2

I completely agree. I see VASTLY more men rioting, shouting erratically and emotionally in the streets than I've ever seen women do.

This is the one issue I have with TD.

1
deleted 1 point ago +5 / -4
1
knightofday 1 point ago +1 / -0

its true. The majority in universities, professional careers seem to be women. NOT absolving men at all, just an observation

1
AngryAsian [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean, first off, the majority of problems aren't because of an elected leader. They're because of changes in culture due to women being indoctrinated. 70% of young women are Democrats, and when you look at the amount of young women in college and being pushed into positions of authority, despite lacking merit, you see the problem that needs to be pointed out. Women are unfortunately the problem right now, just look at ANTIFA, you'll get a single woman who thinks that she's "just as tough as any man." And then will go in with a giant group and get her ass kicked. But you'll also have a bunch of weak men who think they're going to get with her that then try to commit crimes to impress her. You'll see it on dating sites, thic girls used to make good girlfriends because they were really nice and knew how to take care of a home, now they're strutting around acting like they're as hot as a 7-10. You'll see it with working women, that have been sold the idea that they can have it all, and then hit the hill and become bitter old ladies who, because they've been put into positions of leadership, are so amazingly spiteful and hateful it's pathetic. Women are the key to what's going on right now, and need to get their shit together.

4
MadRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

Feminism is cancer.

It starts in school and is reinforced in college. College-age women are also by far the most frequent false rape accusers.

4
TonyGucciano 4 points ago +5 / -1

Yes, women need good influences. Men need to lead them. Also men need good influences, women need to demand they are their best self. Both of these have broken down.

3
Jayyfeathrr 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don’t let the fact that liberal women are very vocal distract from the fact that there are MILLIONS of unhappy cuck simps right by their side.

3
deleted 3 points ago +6 / -3
3
CatoWasRight 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ladies...criticism is not inherently misogyny.

Honestly as a woman, the response to this post by women is really discouraging to me, it's the same progressive "how dare you criticize a group" mentality that caused me to leave the left.

If we can't point out that women, especially young ones, tend towards group think and social pressure to conform and are the loudest on social media about it... then what can we point out?

Shall we not point out any tendencies of ANY group?

We may as well go back to reddit.

3
Mummabear20 3 points ago +3 / -0

Society lied to them. Schools lied to them. They were told not to have a family. To deny their instincts. Go get a job. Have a career. It will be more fulfilling. Problem is that it is not. Their lives are an empty vacuum. So they fill it will booze, casual sex, multilevel marketing scams and now socialism. They are incredibly nihilistic. Deep down I think many of them want a family but they have been brainwashed to believe that is a bad thing.

3
thelastlast 3 points ago +3 / -0

many women think they inherently have less power. it sucks, I would imagine. but it explains their behavior when they get some. it aligns with every other human that's felt the same way they do. we're not that different no matter the gender or race or whatever.

then there are the patriot women, who know they have power, know where it comes from, and don't fear losing it because they were born with it. and thus they wield it responsibly, just like every other human that feels the same way.

these are the two camps we're breaking into right now as a species. they used to be called The Strong and The Weak.

3
Trump_USA_2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

The Left slogans are are literally logical fallacies. "In this house we believe in slogans" - I will dismantle them one by one.

  1. Black lives matter. This is a very racist, discriminatory, and excluding slogan. It argues that black lives should be valued more than other lives. It argues that we should predominantly focus our attention on the struggles and issues of the black community. It calls us to think about ourselves in terms of how "black" we are. It encourages the left's woke grievance politics. It encourages us to view ourselves solely through the lens of unjust oppression, so that in the left's eyes, our very existence and our lives amount to a scoreboard of oppression points. It encourages endless claims of victimhood in all situations.
  2. Love is love. This is the most pointless circular reasoning fault-by-tautology statement ever! Love is never defined, actually. Love, when you are talking about a romantic relationship, is built through caring, responsibility, supporting a family, listening to your partner, and being there for them. Here is the reality that the left will never accept on its face - LGBTQ people, unless you have a lesbian transgender woman who didn't yet have sex change surgery date a woman, will be unable to naturally reproduce and have their own genetically similar children. IF we want LGBTQ normalized so that a quarter of the people seek this sort of gender and sexual liberation, then millions upon millions of women would be condemned to a slave-like existence of surrogacy. IF THESE LGBTQ PEOPLE WANT TO HAVE CHILDREN OF THEIR OWN, surrogate mothers would need to nourish the babies of gay men or any couple where one of them don't have a uterus. IF THESE LGBTQ PEOPLE WANT TO HAVE CHILDREN OF THEIR OWN, we will be incentivizing wealthy male pricks to donate as much sperm that they can to ultimately as many couples as they can, in which one of them don't have a penis or testicles. Which would mean the occurrence of bastardry will exceed what we have seen in the Deep South during the 1800s or something like that. If in a loving relationship the couple cannot naturally have children because these couples' reproductive organs are biologically incompatible, then this TYPE OF LOVE IS SELF-SERVING AND ENDANGERS THE VERY EXISTENCE OF HUMANITY.
  3. Women's rights are human rights/Feminism is for everyone: The Left's ideas about women's rights and feminism would be nonexistent if MEN DURING THE ENLIGHTENMENT did not put forth ideas about basic human equality, the goodness of liberty, the idea of people as rational actors, and the idea that everyone deserves the right of political participation and property ownership. In the first wave of feminism, women advocated for this political equality and legal equality in the Western World BECAUSE THEY INSISTED THAT THEY WERE NO DIFFERENT THAN MEN IN TERMS OF THEIR CONSTITUTION AS HUMAN BEINGS AND THEREFORE DESERVED EQUAL RIGHTS. But, this original equal rights, rationality, pro-political participation, and pro-property ownership ideas only became mainstream WHEN GROUPS OF DISSIDENT MEN DURING THE 1600s and 1700s INSISTED THAT THESE RIGHTS EVEN EXISTED, AND MORE IMPORTANTLY, THAT MEN WHO WERE BOURGEOISIE AND MIDDLE CLASS WERE ENTITLED TO FULL POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC PARTICIPATION IN SOCIETY. Women's rights or Feminism Wave #1 in this sense did not fundamentally originate with women at all. Instead, women believed that they too were human beings no different than men, and therefore also deserved the same rights that men were entitled to. So, when the left talks about racial justice or women's rights or anything pigeonholed solely based on identity, realize this. They (THE LEFT) only mention social identity characteristics to further divide us and to further indoctrinate us into thinking of ourselves as victims of an evil social order in some way, shape, or form. FREE YOURSELF FROM THE POWER OF THOSE DIVISIVE TACTICS, AND INSTEAD RECOGNIZE THAT YOU ARE REALLY JUST SEEKING EQUAL RIGHTS AND EQUAL TREATMENT. BE VERY AWARE THAT APPEALS TO DIFFERENCES IN SOCIAL IDENTITY CHARACTERISTICS ARE DESIGNED TO CREATE EXCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES FOR THE SAKE OF AFFIRMING THAT EVERYONE WHO SHARES YOUR IDENTITY CHARACTERISTIC IS FUNDAMENTALLY GOOD, IN OPPOSITION TO ANYONE WHO HAPPENS TO BE STRAIGHT, WHITE, AND MALE. THINK ABOUT HOW RIDICULOUS THE IDEA OF STRAIGHT, WHITE AND MALE SUPERIORITY ACTUALLY IS TODAY. MEN HAVE LOWER EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT THAN WOMEN ON AVERAGE, LIVE SHORTER LIVES THAN WOMEN, ARE MORE LIKELY TO DIE OF SUICIDE THAN WOMEN, ARE EXPECTED TO BE MORE INTERESTED IN ENTERING DANGEROUS AND LIFE-THREATENING OCCUPATIONS THAN WOMEN, AND ARE MORE LIKELY TO DIE DEATHS OF DESPAIR THAN WOMEN. ON TOP OF THAT, ANY WOMAN WILLING TO AND DESIRING A POSITION OF LEADERSHIP, A POSITION IN STEM, A POSITION IN THE ARTS, OR A POSITION IN POLITICS TODAY BENEFITS FROM HUNDREDS OF FEMININE AFFINITY GROUPS. THERE ARE NO SUCH EXCLUSIVE FRATERNITIES FOR MEN. AND YET, WE ARE SUPPOSED TO THINK THAT STRAIGHT WHITE MALES - WHO AT MOST ONLY COMPRISE ABOUT 5% OF THE GLOBAL POPULATION - ENJOY UNPARALLELED SUPREMACY?
2
no_step_on_snek 2 points ago +2 / -0

Unfortunately he was wrong in this prediction, turns out it is the sniveling weasels of men who want to fuck those women.

1
AngryAsian [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Still being led around by the women. Do you think that if chubby chicks were still nice and made good housewives there'd be sniveling male feminists? Nope! Instead, these chubs have been told that they're just as attractive as hot girls and believe it so you've got a bunch of weak men who chase them and instead of getting them they instead get fucked and chucked by alphas who are drunk one night over and over until they finally hit the wall and become a full time "activist"

2
JesseLeePeterson 2 points ago +2 / -0

AMAZING

2
JustInTime2_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn said the same. These Commie women are dangerous and crazy.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
fapoo 2 points ago +2 / -0

well its not going to be fully grown adult males, they are physically the strongest.

2
chahn1138 2 points ago +2 / -0

TRUTH

2
ARfreedom 2 points ago +2 / -0

George Orwell predicted Karens way back in the 1940s.

1
milktoastfencesitter 1 point ago +1 / -0

George Orwell also wrote “The Road to Wigan Pier,” about his time traveling among the poor working class towns of Northern England.

He wrote it for the Left Book Club and if you only read his introduction, than would be enough. Orwell was a socialist himself but absolutely scorches the types of people he observed who were also socialists. All the same weak men, hippie, vegan, sexually liberal, uninterested in truth - only emotion, constantly claiming to be victims, elitist, self righteous know-it-alls we see today. This book was written in the 1930’s. Same crap, different century. Nothing wrong with hippies or vegans, but it was a special attitude that often seemed to go along with these types that concerned him.

Orwell burned these socialists so badly that the editor wrote a forward to address the introduction, to strongly disagree with Orwell’s take on socialists.

2
AngryAsian [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think that Socialism as a conceptual theory in a vacuum sounds fine, but in practice, and with a healthy dose of understanding human nature, it cannot exist in the real world.

2
milktoastfencesitter 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree.

With my family I am a communist.

With everyone else I’m a capitalist.

At the basic level of life is a competition for survival and we need incentives to get out of bed everyday and do stuff that aren’t our first choice. Fair market capitalism may not be a perfect system but it’s the best we’ve got and it mimics human behavior well enough.

1
DudeNoOne 1 point ago +1 / -0

Found my pasta

1
LibtardJesus 1 point ago +1 / -0

We got frogs, cenepedes and bears. Let's welcome the based racoons!

1
sentient-potato 1 point ago +4 / -3

Right...so go to YT and look up the top 10 rioting videos that Andy Ngo or Tim Pool have posted. It is OVERWHELMINGLY shrieking men, agitated and emotional in the streets. Angry and tantrummy, or elated and stealing.

Tell me again why women are the problem?

1
Work2gethrBiglyOrDie 1 point ago +2 / -1

How many of those "men" were raised by single mothers.

2
sentient-potato 2 points ago +3 / -1

Most, probably. And why are those mothers single?

2
flashersenpai 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because they picked poorly.

1
AngryAsian [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

LOL they may look like "men," because they're so overweight, but usually they're women.

1
NotoriousCIC 1 point ago +4 / -3

The worst decision ever made was giving women the vote. Too emotional, statistically more likely to be mentally ill, and easily swayed.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
0
jsphere256 0 points ago +1 / -1

Our women are pretty cool tbh

0
mostlyatnight 0 points ago +2 / -2

Sadly. Anyone with a brain wouldn’t discriminate against a qualified woman with drive. Unfortunately there aren’t a lot of them out their. ACB Is definitely one. A shining example.

1
AngryAsian [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'll believe it when I see it, the fact is that Ted Cruz would have been a better choice.

2
mostlyatnight 2 points ago +2 / -0

I do like that guy a lot.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
1
mostlyatnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok radio. Good luck with that.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
TheMadManDidItAgain 0 points ago +1 / -1

And then there was Julia....

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3