The Left slogans are are literally logical fallacies. "In this house we believe in slogans" - I will dismantle them one by one.

1. Black lives matter. This is a very racist, discriminatory, and excluding slogan. It argues that black lives should be valued more than other lives. It argues that we should predominantly focus our attention on the struggles and issues of the black community. It calls us to think about ourselves in terms of how "black" we are. It encourages the left's woke grievance politics. It encourages us to view ourselves solely through the lens of unjust oppression, so that in the left's eyes, our very existence and our lives amount to a scoreboard of oppression points. It encourages endless claims of victimhood in all situations.
2. Love is love. This is the most pointless circular reasoning fault-by-tautology statement ever! Love is never defined, actually. Love, when you are talking about a romantic relationship, is built through caring, responsibility, supporting a family, listening to your partner, and being there for them. Here is the reality that the left will never accept on its face - LGBTQ people, unless you have a lesbian transgender woman who didn't yet have sex change surgery date a woman, will be unable to naturally reproduce and have their own genetically similar children. IF we want LGBTQ normalized so that a quarter of the people seek this sort of gender and sexual liberation, then millions upon millions of women would be condemned to a slave-like existence of surrogacy. IF THESE LGBTQ PEOPLE WANT TO HAVE CHILDREN OF THEIR OWN, surrogate mothers would need to nourish the babies of gay men or any couple where one of them don't have a uterus. IF THESE LGBTQ PEOPLE WANT TO HAVE CHILDREN OF THEIR OWN, we will be incentivizing wealthy male pricks to donate as much sperm that they can to ultimately as many couples as they can, in which one of them don't have a penis or testicles. Which would mean the occurrence of bastardry will exceed what we have seen in the Deep South during the 1800s or something like that. If in a loving relationship the couple cannot naturally have children because these couples' reproductive organs are biologically incompatible, then this TYPE OF LOVE IS SELF-SERVING AND ENDANGERS THE VERY EXISTENCE OF HUMANITY.
3. Women's rights are human rights/Feminism is for everyone: The Left's ideas about women's rights and feminism would be nonexistent if MEN DURING THE ENLIGHTENMENT did not put forth ideas about basic human equality, the goodness of liberty, the idea of people as rational actors, and the idea that everyone deserves the right of political participation and property ownership. In the first wave of feminism, women advocated for this political equality and legal equality in the Western World BECAUSE THEY INSISTED THAT THEY WERE NO DIFFERENT THAN MEN IN TERMS OF THEIR CONSTITUTION AS HUMAN BEINGS AND THEREFORE DESERVED EQUAL RIGHTS. But, this original equal rights, rationality, pro-political participation, and pro-property ownership ideas only became mainstream WHEN GROUPS OF DISSIDENT MEN DURING THE 1600s and 1700s INSISTED THAT THESE RIGHTS EVEN EXISTED, AND MORE IMPORTANTLY, THAT MEN WHO WERE BOURGEOISIE AND MIDDLE CLASS WERE ENTITLED TO FULL POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC PARTICIPATION IN SOCIETY. Women's rights or Feminism Wave #1 in this sense did not fundamentally originate with women at all. Instead, women believed that they too were human beings no different than men, and therefore also deserved the same rights that men were entitled to. So, when the left talks about racial justice or women's rights or anything pigeonholed solely based on identity, realize this. They (THE LEFT) only mention social identity characteristics to further divide us and to further indoctrinate us into thinking of ourselves as victims of an evil social order in some way, shape, or form. FREE YOURSELF FROM THE POWER OF THOSE DIVISIVE TACTICS, AND INSTEAD RECOGNIZE THAT YOU ARE REALLY JUST SEEKING EQUAL RIGHTS AND EQUAL TREATMENT. BE VERY AWARE THAT APPEALS TO DIFFERENCES IN SOCIAL IDENTITY CHARACTERISTICS ARE DESIGNED TO CREATE EXCLUSIVE COMMUNITIES FOR THE SAKE OF AFFIRMING THAT EVERYONE WHO SHARES YOUR IDENTITY CHARACTERISTIC IS FUNDAMENTALLY GOOD, IN OPPOSITION TO ANYONE WHO HAPPENS TO BE STRAIGHT, WHITE, AND MALE. THINK ABOUT HOW RIDICULOUS THE IDEA OF STRAIGHT, WHITE AND MALE SUPERIORITY ACTUALLY IS TODAY. MEN HAVE LOWER EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT THAN WOMEN ON AVERAGE, LIVE SHORTER LIVES THAN WOMEN, ARE MORE LIKELY TO DIE OF SUICIDE THAN WOMEN, ARE EXPECTED TO BE MORE INTERESTED IN ENTERING DANGEROUS AND LIFE-THREATENING OCCUPATIONS THAN WOMEN, AND ARE MORE LIKELY TO DIE DEATHS OF DESPAIR THAN WOMEN. ON TOP OF THAT, ANY WOMAN WILLING TO AND DESIRING A POSITION OF LEADERSHIP, A POSITION IN STEM, A POSITION IN THE ARTS, OR A POSITION IN POLITICS TODAY BENEFITS FROM HUNDREDS OF FEMININE AFFINITY GROUPS. THERE ARE NO SUCH EXCLUSIVE FRATERNITIES FOR MEN. AND YET, WE ARE SUPPOSED TO THINK THAT STRAIGHT WHITE MALES - WHO AT MOST ONLY COMPRISE ABOUT 5% OF THE GLOBAL POPULATION - ENJOY UNPARALLELED SUPREMACY?