Here's the thing though - aim for the brutal, plain, based TRUTH.
i.e. don't try to swing the pendulum all the way to the other side - meaning don't replace leftist propaganda/spin with rightist propaganda/spin - that makes it too easy to dismiss.
Just brutal, plain-spoken, based TRUTH.
Because plain-spoken truth resonates within people - even when they won't admit it.
Makes me wish we had a legit printing press, and could distribute a "winners dictionary"...lol
Any edits to the text of which in future versions would require the original definition, the winners definition, and what is currently held in high regard so as to eliminate the "newspeak" comparison. And through the ages one could compare older copies to the new and see the advancement of the "winners" tongue as it relates to current and past events.
The idea is to spread the idea. A critical thinker would read my earlier reply to the op, and thus alleviate the necessity for the group think arguement.
I agree in spirit, if not with all the term replacements you have listed. The reason I dislike the Republican party is because they always roll over and use the leftists language. They never reject the terminology.
I've been waging a one man war to get Black Fragility to catch on. They need safe spaces, their bad behavior/performance is all blamed on "stereotype threat", the only word in the English language that you absolutely cannot say, even in reference, is a slur directed at them, etc. They are fragile.
A key component for Winning with words, is to stop using sarcasm. When we say "politically correct", we mean it as a snarky insult. However, it subconsciously plants some seeds of validity to normies who hear that.
I like the idea, but this list shows why it’s hard to actually implement.
Note: Trump has recently articulated that a large purpose for applying terminology or labels is to communicate a differentiating conceptual understanding to the public when he discussed the terms ‘unsolicited’ vs. ‘universal’ in regards to ballots.
‘Left-wing’ fails to adequately describe the monopolistic behemoth from consolidation or the widespread false assumption that it strives to be independent.
‘Legacy’ fails to describe the emergent nexus of hi-tech sophisticated censorship techniques and social-media amplification of disinformation operating in synergy with the ‘msm’ consolidated media entities.
Abortion ----> 'Feticide', 'Infanticide'
There is some boundary where abortion stops and these other terms apply. Some consider them interchangeable, but cannot provide scientific rationale to support that, retreating into emotional or rhetorical arguments instead. (Instead of argueing with me over this, try simply working backwards in time from age two to the production of an individual non-fertilized egg or sperm and explaining logically with science — not appeal to authority — at what point destroying the cells ISN’T something resembling ‘killing a human’)
Diversity ----> International Diversity
‘Diversity’ became a buzzword *because courts ruled that it is an ‘acceptable’ reason to enact otherwise race-based discriminatory actions (such as enrollment criteria). Adding ‘international’ isn’t an improvement, and might be worse.
Demographic replacement is only one small consequence of globalist ideology. While important in its own right, ambiguous substitution for the broader term diminishes understanding of the problem by limiting its scope.
Politically Correct ----> Leftist dogma
There are differences between these terms in that the Right, or ‘right’, or conservatives, and especially RINOs, also subject themselves to forms of political correctness that have little to do with Leftist ideology, apart from the general trend of wrongthink censorship.
Feminism ----> Female Supremacy
Like ‘Replacism’, this term only describes one consequence of an ideology that presents multiple kinds of other, equally problematic consequences (as well as other inherent problems not involving outcomes).
As if "surviving" a racist incident is so crazy it almost took someones life. Or someone that has been sexually assaulted. It's not survival.
The left has built a dictionary for themselves and implemented into our collective conscious via propoganda. It's hard to think correctly when the words you use are superimposed upon you by every sphere of life. From board rooms to tv, news to speeches, kids homework to college papers... Every new source of information has been taken control of and weaponized to deteriorate our ability to see past their implementation of misleading words and phrases.
I think I coined the term about a decade ago. I have been seeing it used more and more, but it might have been a parallel invention.
My goal is to get it unto the dictionary, like “lamestream media”. I may have invented that long ago, before Rush Limbaugh made it popular. But, i’m not sure of the origin.
Critical Race Theory - False Race Hierarchy
Critical Race Theory - Anti-Caucasion Hate Speech
Critical Race Theory - Racism
Critical Race Theory - False Theory which under-emphasizes economic class disparities and attributes those in a racist manner.
My thought is to rate them boy how pissed off the intended target would get by the term. Calling CNN a bunch of dick-sucking presstitutes I think would cause a few heads to self-immolate.
Why would we stop using the terms globalism/globalist? Nobody knows wtf a "replacist" is. Replace what exactly? Fake News works because its blunt and to the point. Saying "feticide" instead of abortion won't make your position sound stronger. It will just make people wonder why you use such weird lingo.
I agree for things like "anonymous sources," "diversity," all the "-phobias," and "climate denier" is another beauty that like "white nationalist" means nothing but is meant to sound slanderous. Terms like globalist and abortion aren't terms the left came up with though and IMO don't belong on this list. But I like your premise.
I know what I mean when I say certain words, and if someone is gonna misunderstand because they are too intellectually lazy to figure it out from context, that's their problem, not mine.
I refuse to change the words or language I use for anyone's sake.
I love this idea. Screw Webster, we need a Winners dictionary
Here's the thing though - aim for the brutal, plain, based TRUTH.
i.e. don't try to swing the pendulum all the way to the other side - meaning don't replace leftist propaganda/spin with rightist propaganda/spin - that makes it too easy to dismiss. Just brutal, plain-spoken, based TRUTH. Because plain-spoken truth resonates within people - even when they won't admit it.
Plain-spoken Truth is the ultimate redpill.
This guy gets it.
www.dictionary.win
edit: typo
No, can't misspell "dictionary."
Nope.
Sorry, I'm French speaking originally.
That would explain it!
;-)
This is actually a game-changer.
Love it!
Makes me wish we had a legit printing press, and could distribute a "winners dictionary"...lol
Any edits to the text of which in future versions would require the original definition, the winners definition, and what is currently held in high regard so as to eliminate the "newspeak" comparison. And through the ages one could compare older copies to the new and see the advancement of the "winners" tongue as it relates to current and past events.
Good idea!
Anyone got an industrial printer and binding experience?
E.t.a i can contribute to editorialization
Maybe we just all come up with ideas and vote up the best? Decentralization ftw?
Meant editorialization mainly as a spellcheck. Nothing more
I will buy a copy.... or a few hundred... Submit them to the local libraries...
I would love to do this. Pull the same shit dems do all the time.
I like the way you think!
I like your commitment!
Although OP might not have the best examples, this is how we win.
Someone needs to take OPs idea and make it better.
Yeah, the examples sort of suck but the idea is good.
The medium is the message?
Yeah "Legacy" sounds like a step up from MSM. I'm OK with continuing to call them fake news, XiNN, MSDNC, democrat media, DNC propaganda, etc.
When I hear "legacy" I think of something time-honored.
I do prefer that one myself, but I gotta go with the president on his pick.
Good point.
In the environments I've been in, legacy means we're replacing it because it's old and doesn't do the job anymore.
You're right but we have to also avoid using the left's talking points and frame of reference somehow.
You are smart! But you may be smarter than most people...
We want to avoid group-think but it wouldn't hurt to avoid leftism.
But the uneducated masses may need descriptors visually induced.
See my idea below. Its not about group think, its about calling a spade a spade, and not just a gardening implement.
The idea is to spread the idea. A critical thinker would read my earlier reply to the op, and thus alleviate the necessity for the group think arguement.
E.t.a. as i suggested in my reply to you.
Oh we will, we will. Love and prayers pede
Funny comment
you are right on this for sure!
Hmmm. This post is more important than people realize.
I agree in spirit, if not with all the term replacements you have listed. The reason I dislike the Republican party is because they always roll over and use the leftists language. They never reject the terminology.
Diversity = "Racism" or "Institutional Racism."
Intersectional Politics = "Bigotry" or "Institutional Bigotry."
Black Lives Matter = "Black Fragility."
Antifa = "Communists."
I've been waging a one man war to get Black Fragility to catch on. They need safe spaces, their bad behavior/performance is all blamed on "stereotype threat", the only word in the English language that you absolutely cannot say, even in reference, is a slur directed at them, etc. They are fragile.
Black fragility and Jewish fragility.
Both groups have been stigmatized.
And both groups have lots of members who hate themselves.
BTW, I don't trust that Robin d'Angelo, or whatever her name is.
I think she's a CIA project.
Do Feminism -> Female Supremacy and I'm in.
Thank you!
I'll give you another one.
Voting by mail -> Mass voter fraud.
Okay, that one was a joke.
Anonymous sources -> Claims without credibility.
This is way better. For some reason Rush would always call them the "Elite Media" which made no sense.
A key component for Winning with words, is to stop using sarcasm. When we say "politically correct", we mean it as a snarky insult. However, it subconsciously plants some seeds of validity to normies who hear that.
I like the idea, but this list shows why it’s hard to actually implement.
Note: Trump has recently articulated that a large purpose for applying terminology or labels is to communicate a differentiating conceptual understanding to the public when he discussed the terms ‘unsolicited’ vs. ‘universal’ in regards to ballots.
MSN, 'Mainstream Media' ----> 'Left-wing media', 'Legacy media'
‘Left-wing’ fails to adequately describe the monopolistic behemoth from consolidation or the widespread false assumption that it strives to be independent.
‘Legacy’ fails to describe the emergent nexus of hi-tech sophisticated censorship techniques and social-media amplification of disinformation operating in synergy with the ‘msm’ consolidated media entities.
Abortion ----> 'Feticide', 'Infanticide'
There is some boundary where abortion stops and these other terms apply. Some consider them interchangeable, but cannot provide scientific rationale to support that, retreating into emotional or rhetorical arguments instead. (Instead of argueing with me over this, try simply working backwards in time from age two to the production of an individual non-fertilized egg or sperm and explaining logically with science — not appeal to authority — at what point destroying the cells ISN’T something resembling ‘killing a human’)
Diversity ----> International Diversity
‘Diversity’ became a buzzword *because courts ruled that it is an ‘acceptable’ reason to enact otherwise race-based discriminatory actions (such as enrollment criteria). Adding ‘international’ isn’t an improvement, and might be worse.
Globalists ----> Replacists Globalism ----> Replacism
Demographic replacement is only one small consequence of globalist ideology. While important in its own right, ambiguous substitution for the broader term diminishes understanding of the problem by limiting its scope.
Politically Correct ----> Leftist dogma
There are differences between these terms in that the Right, or ‘right’, or conservatives, and especially RINOs, also subject themselves to forms of political correctness that have little to do with Leftist ideology, apart from the general trend of wrongthink censorship.
Feminism ----> Female Supremacy
Like ‘Replacism’, this term only describes one consequence of an ideology that presents multiple kinds of other, equally problematic consequences (as well as other inherent problems not involving outcomes).
Here's why it's difficult:
They aren't left-wing AT ALL.
They are RIGHT wing. In 1789, in the French National Assembly, those who wanted MORE power for the State sat on the RIGHT.
Those who wanted LESS power for the State sat on the LEFT.
We are LEFT wing.
They are RIGHT wing.
What we're seeing is RIGHT-WING violence and white supremacy -- coming from Antifa, BLM, and the DNC.
Joe Biden says he IS the DNC.
The guy who used to hang with Robert Byrd.
Now does it all make sense?
They lie about that, too!
Wait until all those kids who thought they were progressive find out they are right wing, establishment.
In other words, fuddie-duddies.
Ha!
Another one is "survivor" Survivor ≠ victim.
As if "surviving" a racist incident is so crazy it almost took someones life. Or someone that has been sexually assaulted. It's not survival.
The left has built a dictionary for themselves and implemented into our collective conscious via propoganda. It's hard to think correctly when the words you use are superimposed upon you by every sphere of life. From board rooms to tv, news to speeches, kids homework to college papers... Every new source of information has been taken control of and weaponized to deteriorate our ability to see past their implementation of misleading words and phrases.
Ahem...
^^^ Misleadia
I think I coined the term about a decade ago. I have been seeing it used more and more, but it might have been a parallel invention.
My goal is to get it unto the dictionary, like “lamestream media”. I may have invented that long ago, before Rush Limbaugh made it popular. But, i’m not sure of the origin.
Maybe add things like
Victimhood - ResponsibilityPhobia
Constant Losing - SuccessPhobia
Living in Basement - Failure to Launch
Good idea.
Let's use the language precisely -- not to deceive.
A couple of thoughts below.
Editing as I go to update.
Critical Race Theory - False Race Hierarchy
Critical Race Theory - Anti-Caucasion Hate Speech
Critical Race Theory - Racism
Critical Race Theory - False Theory which under-emphasizes economic class disparities and attributes those in a racist manner.
Just spitballing..
Feminism = Gynocracy
"Left-wing media"? No, Presstitutes.
My thought is to rate them boy how pissed off the intended target would get by the term. Calling CNN a bunch of dick-sucking presstitutes I think would cause a few heads to self-immolate.
Thank you. Clear and precise language communicates TRUTH.
I tried posting something similar a while ago and it got no traction. In any event, I have some additions to make:
Gender ---> Sex
People of Color ---> Nonwhites
Transgender ---> Trannies/Transvestites
Almost anything with the suffix "phobia" ---> Just don't use the term, call it out for being bullshit since it's not an actual fear.
Im a winner.
He's a winner.
She’s a winner.
Wouldn't you like to be a winner too?
I would offer:
Globalists -> collaborators
Globalism -> global totalitarianism, big government, subservience
Politically correct -> veritaphobic, dogmatic, social construct
Feminism -> misandry, hate speech, social construct
Anonymous sources -> baseless conspiracy theory, hearsay, conjecture.
As soon as I saw someone use the "anti-choice" label I started using "pro-death" to identify abortion enthusiasts.
Why would we stop using the terms globalism/globalist? Nobody knows wtf a "replacist" is. Replace what exactly? Fake News works because its blunt and to the point. Saying "feticide" instead of abortion won't make your position sound stronger. It will just make people wonder why you use such weird lingo.
I agree for things like "anonymous sources," "diversity," all the "-phobias," and "climate denier" is another beauty that like "white nationalist" means nothing but is meant to sound slanderous. Terms like globalist and abortion aren't terms the left came up with though and IMO don't belong on this list. But I like your premise.
We need to build our own Win-a-pedia!
So you want us to use words from our own version of the Newspeak dictionary?
My language will not be compelled by anyone.
I know what I mean when I say certain words, and if someone is gonna misunderstand because they are too intellectually lazy to figure it out from context, that's their problem, not mine.
I refuse to change the words or language I use for anyone's sake.
News outlets have been called Liberal Media for decades. Of course, they've gone hard-left over recent years with communist funding.
Great... when does your version of the Newspeak Dictionary come out?
Diversity is weakness.
Assimilation is strength.
Bud.... right wing media is just as bad. Just because it's not shilling communism doesn't mean it's giving you real information instead of a narrative
Geschundheitfuhrers - government officials that restrict liberties on medical grounds
Globalism and globalists aren't really left wing terms. Legacy media is better then left wing media. Abortion is just murder, doesn't need a name.
I agree.