The court also upheld the state's poll-watcher law, which Trump's campaign had sought to invalidate in federal court.
Under that law, poll watchers — a political party-appointed volunteer who sits inside of a polling place to monitor Election Day activity for perceived irregularities — must be a registered voter from the county.
Republicans say they are unable to must enough poll watchers in Philadelphia, where one in five of Pennsylvania's Democratic voters live. Democrats charge that lifting the long-standing restriction would open the floodgates to voter intimidation in polling places.
So, nothing illegal is happening; but, as usual, they have the set up the rules in their favor and won't change them.
This comment is very underrated because it actually explain a lot of what's going on here and why Barr or the DOJ or whoever can't really do much about it. There's no "crime" to go after; just very dirty politics.
Some context for everyone. Since I had none.
https://www.dailyitem.com/news/update-pennsylvania-court-gives-democrats-wins-in-mail-in-vote-case/article_936c6796-f908-11ea-b7a7-876b4b6cbf03.html
So, nothing illegal is happening; but, as usual, they have the set up the rules in their favor and won't change them.
This comment is very underrated because it actually explain a lot of what's going on here and why Barr or the DOJ or whoever can't really do much about it. There's no "crime" to go after; just very dirty politics.
When the people who write the laws are all criminals it's funny how that's the case every time