The court also upheld the state's poll-watcher law, which Trump's campaign had sought to invalidate in federal court.
Under that law, poll watchers ... must be a registered voter from the county.
Republicans say they are unable to must enough poll watchers in Philadelphia, where one in five of Pennsylvania's Democratic voters live. Democrats charge that lifting the long-standing restriction would open the floodgates to voter intimidation in polling places.
If I'm reading this all correct, then there's actually nothing against the law going on here. It's just insanely dirty politics.
Barr or the DOJ or whoever can't really do much about it if there's no crime to do anything with. I'm not defending them for not doing stuff else-ware; but I don't know what they could do here when it's technically the law.
Aside from the voter fraud that goes on behind closed doors, you mean.
Voter fraud is against the law. Requiring that poll watchers be registered in the county they work in is not and that's what I was talking about. I wasn't talking about what goes on behind closed doors. Voter fraud should obviously be stopped as often as possible.
Making excuses for Barr at this point just outs you as a fucktard.
I said I was not defending Barr in the sentence before the one you quoted.
What exactly can Barr do about this specifically? and by here I mean a law that says "poll watchers must be a registered voter from the county."? If that's is what is preventing republican poll watchers from being at the polls how does Barr change it?
For context. In an article posted by another pede: https://www.dailyitem.com/news/update-pennsylvania-court-gives-democrats-wins-in-mail-in-vote-case/article_936c6796-f908-11ea-b7a7-876b4b6cbf03.html
If I'm reading this all correct, then there's actually nothing against the law going on here. It's just insanely dirty politics.
Barr or the DOJ or whoever can't really do much about it if there's no crime to do anything with. I'm not defending them for not doing stuff else-ware; but I don't know what they could do here when it's technically the law.
Aside from the voter fraud that goes on behind closed doors, you mean.
Making excuses for Barr at this point just outs you as a fucktard.
Voter fraud is against the law. Requiring that poll watchers be registered in the county they work in is not and that's what I was talking about. I wasn't talking about what goes on behind closed doors. Voter fraud should obviously be stopped as often as possible.
I said I was not defending Barr in the sentence before the one you quoted.
What exactly can Barr do about this specifically? and by here I mean a law that says "poll watchers must be a registered voter from the county."? If that's is what is preventing republican poll watchers from being at the polls how does Barr change it?