4267
Comments (71)
sorted by:
120
bigdeer65 120 points ago +120 / -0

Weird is not the word I would use

59
deleted 59 points ago +59 / -0
13
ColbyP 13 points ago +13 / -0

Right? How is she not in jail, much less employed as a "journalist" still?

2
FOOLISHPROPHETX 2 points ago +3 / -1

"Rules for thee" is getting pretty FR*CKIN old my friend

26
deleted 26 points ago +26 / -0
17
KAG_FTW 17 points ago +17 / -0

He probably got that idea from Donna Brazile

91
deleted 91 points ago +91 / -0
65
Thathurtsmyfeelings1 65 points ago +65 / -0

Excuse me sir! Excuse me! Mr. PResIDenT! ExcUse ME!

43
frogman1776 43 points ago +43 / -0

Cuck Wallace was there to annoy Trump, no one interrupts at a debate like that. He wouldn’t let Trump get a counterattack in and ran defense for Biden the whole time. I think Trump expected Biden to be hopped up on meth but Biden smoked a joint instead.

12
G_regulator 12 points ago +12 / -0

That's why I think it was better coming out of trumps mouth, if wallace would have mentioned it, it wouldn't have put Biden on the spot. Biden gave a terrible response to Trump when he questioned Hunters corruption. First "it's debunked" then "Romney said it was too small to bother investigating" then "I'm not discussing ethics and family"

He fuck it up badly.

39
kikikat1949 39 points ago +39 / -0

What about the Biden’s using tax loopholes for their “book and speaking“ deals? As I recall , they use the S Corp tax break to shield millions of dollars in taxes and social security benefits.

7
AlphaOmaga 7 points ago +7 / -0

They were all “Biden paid 300k in taxes”.... sooo that’s over a million in adjusted INCOME that year. From where? God people are saps.

37
generated_name 37 points ago +37 / -0

That question was so out of line. He didn't even ask it in a way where Trump could elaborate on it. It was a yes or no question, designed to get a specific sound byte.

7
Furaffinitydotnet 7 points ago +7 / -0

Specifically for years 2016 and 2017

33
NoMoreMao 33 points ago +33 / -0

Wallace is a faggot.

30
AbrahamLincoln 30 points ago +30 / -0

Or that he asked about the $750 even though the failing NYT contradicted that number in their own article.

18
KAG_FTW 18 points ago +18 / -0

They said he paid millions in that article.

4
Pirate_Lafitte 4 points ago +4 / -0

And he rehashed the long debunked "very fine people" hoax. The guy is legit stupid and shouldn't be working as a journalist.

3
BlackJack 3 points ago +3 / -0

Stop thinking they are stupid. They know exactly what they are doing.

1
FOOLISHPROPHETX 1 point ago +2 / -1

THIS! These dudes are assets, operatives, handled and only are there to push a narrative to the sheep.

20
Kckroosian 20 points ago +20 / -0

Wallace is not an objective journalist? He is a biased moderator? Just a quick couple of thoughts.

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
3
Kckroosian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Who are the next “moderators”?

10
NotProgCensored 10 points ago +10 / -0

Well they sure aren't Tucker or Maria Bartiromo

3
Pirate_Lafitte 3 points ago +3 / -0

And just plain stupid. Let's not forget that

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-7
Terrortot -7 points ago +3 / -10

I thought Wallace was fine. He was worried Trump was gonna go all Rowdy Roddy Piper on Joe Biden with a coconut.

I think Wallace was Captain Lou Albano.

10
Pirate_Lafitte 10 points ago +10 / -0

Fine!? Here are just two examples of his failure as a moderator - He apparently didn't read the NY times article on the trump taxes as he cited the wrong amount paid and he rehashed the thoroughly debunked " very fine people" hoax and he did it during a presidential debate with millions watching. Why? Is he lazy, stupid, in the bag for Biden, or all three?

1
Terrortot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump handled Wallace like the pencil-necked geek he is.

Look at last night as a pro wrestling match and you will appreciate it much more.

19
PhantomShield72 19 points ago +19 / -0

"Weird"

10
grad16uc 10 points ago +10 / -0

Certainly a head-scratcher

2
KS-76- 2 points ago +2 / -0

Subversively weird.

12
rangooooo 12 points ago +12 / -0

And asked Trump about violence by white supremacists but didn't ask Biden about violence by BLM.

5
IslamIsEvil 5 points ago +5 / -0

Or antifa

11
2020isKAGtime 11 points ago +11 / -0

Because it has been discredited -Joe Biden

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
8
VetforTrump 8 points ago +8 / -0

What did you expect? neutrality from Wallace. Neutrality is for real journalist and thinkers. Wallace is an actor who plays the put of a journo. His father might have been real but its unlikely.

8
559throw 8 points ago +8 / -0

Well Joe said it was debunked so that makes it debunked.

NO MORE QUESTIONS ABOUT IT, JOE SAID SO!!

7
deleted 7 points ago +8 / -1
7
IslamIsEvil 7 points ago +7 / -0

Especially given that the Biden scandal has been out there for a long time and the hit piece on Trump taxes just dropped yesterday. Yet Wallace missed the bigger news story of mail in voter fraud uncovered by Veritas. Trump should have dropped that name.

7
ModsBanPaleos 7 points ago +8 / -1

Or biden or pelosis 47 year tax returns

6
behemoth887 6 points ago +6 / -0

not only did he not bring up that topic, when it was brought up he said the american people don't care about it and then he changed the subject to climate change. crazy shit.

6
midoridesu 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm surprised Trump wasn't better prepared for that question. Maybe I'm a retard, but it seems like the best answers would have been something like: "I pay as little tax as I'm legally required to which is what I suggest everyone should do. Also, I didn't make the tax laws, people like Sleepy Joe here did that. Speaking of which. 47 years in office and what has he done for America? Not much."

2
CannonballJunior 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree. Reportedly Trump did no mock debate sessions at all as prep. Frankly that's a mistake. Don't care how good you are, mock debate sessions in the presence of a debate coach and policy wonks can help you deliver more artfully articulated and effective responses.

6
FakeNewsCNN 6 points ago +6 / -0

No it’s not weird Chris Wallace is a registered democrat.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
ChillBlinton 5 points ago +6 / -1

I briefly gave Wallace a little respect during that recent interview with Trump where he hit him with some hardballs. I look at it as good exercise for Trump, debate practice, if you will. I should have known, it would just be debate practice for debating Chris Wallace.

This is why I wish they'd have more debates throughout the four years of the presidency, just for the hell of it. Trump had a lot to say and had to squeeze out as much as he could between Chris' sniveling and Biden's rambling. More debates throughout the term would give Trump a lot more opportunities to stretch his legs and get his point across. Arguing with the press doesn't count because the press is even more biased than Chris Wallace.

5
apathy_meh 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm surprised Donna Brazile wasn't a co-moderator.

3
H_Guderian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trump coulda crushed the tax issue more easily.

3
Pirate_Lafitte 3 points ago +3 / -0

The bias couldn't be more obvious. The CNN debate will probably be more balanced

2
havax 2 points ago +2 / -0

because that has been totally debunked! just ask Snopes.com and CNN!!

2
nb0608 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bizarre that Wallace didn’t even press Biden about that at all. But he pressed Trump heavy on the $750

2
MAGA_Skull 2 points ago +2 / -0

cuck wallace asked trump a gotcha...but what gotcha did he have for biden?????????????????????????

2
CoreyAnder 2 points ago +2 / -0

Biden kept saying that was debunked, but has it really? That seemed to be his response to a lot of accusations.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
MisterZorin 2 points ago +2 / -0

No it's not weird, It's exactly what I expected from this Biden cheerleader.

2
jkatzz 2 points ago +2 / -0

Weird? Nah. Expected horseshit.

Red pilled see though it easily.

2
Brotherhoodlum 2 points ago +2 / -0

How much tax do they expect an individual to pay when they donate their entire salary?

2
Kompromat 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's OK. Trump brought it right the fuck up!!!!!

2
geebeext 2 points ago +2 / -0

Weird is one word for it.... I'd choose another

2
Haun_Solo0211 2 points ago +2 / -0

He kept saying “ Mr. president you’re gonna be happy with this next topic” seemingly trying to get him to let go of the topic at hand that he was blasting Biden on.

2
MeatloafFvck 2 points ago +2 / -0

The $750 in taxes was an uncorroborated story with no evidence.

The Hunter Biden $3.5 million was in the Senate Intelligence Report.

1
Siteless_Vagrant [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep. Pretty scary how quick Wallace jumped to defend Biden on that one. Whole thing was a sham.

2
grndmrshlgando 2 points ago +2 / -0

because all of these people are dirty as fuck, and they're trying to draw attention away from themselves. to trump's 700 dollar tax bill (which of course wasn't even true) but hey lets keep talking about it anyway because we're awful at keeping a low profile and have to project and gas light every half second until they drive us crazy

2
Holeinone 2 points ago +2 / -0

This. It happened early on in the debate. Any semblance of an even handed debate were gone after this moment.

2
Crucial8GB 2 points ago +2 / -0

All of Wallace's questions were globalist talking points.

2
Spirit_of_Resistance 2 points ago +2 / -0

checks Early Life

Ayup

1
Under25BMI 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean, Trump could have pointed out that he divested all his stocks in 2016 after being elected. and has taken a $1/yr salary for the past 3 years.

what's the tax rate on $1 year salary?

1
QSWO1 1 point ago +2 / -1

Chris was just giddy about having the rock behind him.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4