3331
Comments (65)
sorted by:
90
PosterIsDead 90 points ago +90 / -0

Trump goes on Wallace's show regularly. Biden never does but Wallace said he would ask tough questions if he ever did see him. Wallace lied.

53
Brucesky420 53 points ago +53 / -0

Wallace was criticizing Trump's points and policies more than Biden. It was actually insane. It's not the moderators job to do what Biden should be doing - but they knew he wouldn't be able to string enough coherent attacks on Trump so Wallace had to do it for him.

Trump still handled all of it well, it was just so weird to see the moderator take sides on policies and only push one of the people on stage over those policies. Even if he did the same to Biden it wouldn't be acceptable, that's just not the job of a moderator.

3
FatassFangle 3 points ago +3 / -0

It felt like biden was just trying to make it through the debate without a gaffe. This guy is running 4 our nuclear codes.

8
VarangianBard 8 points ago +9 / -1

The wallace choice was strategic. It accomplishes several objectives:

Makes Trump look like the underdog

Allows Trump to take control without it being handed to him

Showcases Trumps skills as a fighter

Highlights the media bias narrative

Pits Trump the populist against the elitist establishment republicans

Makes democrats think of wallace as their guy, so when he goes after Biden on the Green New Deal it hits harder

Wallace’s role has always been to act as the “voice of reason” on Fox in order to pull left leaning “socially liberal fiscally conservative” independents towards the right. Its all part of the plan.

4
Prodigaltrev 4 points ago +4 / -0

No

1
NotTheTendies 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wallace looks like the most likely to be a pedophile at Fox. I've always thought he was corrupt and his nasally voice annoys me. He's not good at his job, is always biased and has weak temperament... I've never understood WHY fox has him as a front man. It's probably because he's easily directed.

Tucker should have had that spot, considering his ratings. Take bias out of the picture - any host from Donna Brazille to ANDERSON Cooper is biased and Anti-Trump. He literally has like 2 or 3 mainstream anchors on his side - Tucker (who is objective against Trump at times, but openly supports him) and Hannity. Biden/Clinton has literally everyone else.

ABC had some cuck who immediately before and after the debate preached many times about how Trump is so far behind in every way, and it'll take a miracle for him... Then after complained that Trump lost because he didn't win enough, even though Biden had a poor showing.

Fucking coward ass greedy corrupt humans. The whole lot of them. I'm sick of thinking they are brainwashed. Half the shit being spouted today about the debate shows how dumb these people are. They think that Trumps tax returns matter when all he's done is out America first. He's spent 4 years proving he's not in Russias bag by making America a better more profitable place. These people are corrupt and just want Trump out because they don't want to be exposed. They've manipulated every major form of media and so many companies into buying their shit that it seems ridiculous to admit you're a Trump supporter, yet they still bitch and complain. Fuck the and fuck the anti Americans who are helping push this agenda.

2
Relhok 2 points ago +2 / -0

I started sensing what you're saying about midway through the debate. Wallace was an ass to Trump early on, but not in a way that would actually change any minds. The bully-sensitive-people will never like Trump's style, yet his base eats it up. I'm glad Trump interrupted every time Biden lied. It was glorious!

2
Fabian 2 points ago +3 / -1

This does sound interesting, however not sure if true. But it could be...

46
deleted 46 points ago +54 / -8
21
IamM 21 points ago +22 / -1

You have to think Wallace's shell would make a really good ash tray.

9
prayinpede 9 points ago +9 / -0

That escalated quickly

7
Salacious_B_Trump 7 points ago +7 / -0

Username checks out.

2
DickTick 2 points ago +17 / -15

I'm really concerned that a lot of people around here don't understand what the threshold for treason really is....

Much like the left has destroyed the meaning behind many a word, we aren't far behind them with shit like that....

Treason should not even be used lightly, much less accused lightly.

Edit -- to the downvoters -- prove me wrong with the textbook definition of treason.......

26
Chick-fill-eh 26 points ago +26 / -0

It concerns me how few people don't think the intentional destruction of our country for personal gain isn't treason.

-4
DickTick -4 points ago +9 / -13

You do realize that treason requires we be at war, right? and I don't mean like the whole we're at war, I mean we actually have to be in a legitimate declared war.....

and it also requires that an American give aid or receive aid from a foreign enemy to the detriment of the United States, while we are at war.... You do understand that that is the textbook threshold by law, right?

Please do explain to me how Chris Wallace received aid OR gave aid to a foreign enemy that we are at war with last night and to the detriment of the United States.....

16
RiverFenix 16 points ago +16 / -0

We've been 'At war' for a long time brother. The War on Drugs. The War on Terrorism.

How many 'States of Emergency' have you heard rescinded?

11
BlueBayou 11 points ago +12 / -1

We are in a very real War with China. Wallace is helping China, which benefits the Corporation he works for (Disney), which has large financial interests in China.

If you don’t understand that we are at War with China, then you are very out of touch.

8
rowdyraider 8 points ago +8 / -0

We are in a formally declared war with North Korea.

7
PropagandaWizard1984 7 points ago +7 / -0

Treason is also covered under sedition, meaning over throw of the US government. No foreign enemy is required. Go read the law again pede. Bare minimum sedition and treason are basically the same thing in the end. They basically are punished the same in the end as well. Organized destruction of the American nation state is organized destruction of the American nation state.

A rose by any other name would still smell as sweet. The definition of treason only requires one to "levy war against the United States". this clause is separate from aid and comfort for the enemy.

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

(Sedition is) the Federal crime of advocacy of insurrection against the government or support for an enemy of the nation during time of war, by speeches, publications and organization. Sedition usually involves actually conspiring to disrupt the legal operation of the government and beyond expression of an opinion or protesting government policy. Sedition is a lesser crime than "treason," which requires actual betrayal of the government or "espionage."

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
3
Ballind 3 points ago +3 / -0

the crime of betraying one's country, especially by attempting to kill the sovereign or overthrow the government.

He's tilting the scale in favor a a man who quite literally got caught trying to overthrow the government to give him a second shot. He's covering for the widespread election fraud as well. Did it last election with the Robert Creamer revelations as well.

What do I win?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
32
Saphrax 32 points ago +32 / -0

Fuck wallace that was a sham. He should issue a public apology and resign.

18
BurnTheSplinters 18 points ago +18 / -0

Already am - OANN - Fox News is controlled opposition

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
12
Tenspot20 12 points ago +14 / -2

This faggot was disrespectful to my President. I want his left arm broken! Next time it will be your legs, boy!

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
7
RiverFenix 7 points ago +7 / -0

Tucker and Hannity and Judge Janine should #WALKAWAY from Fox and start their own network.

2
GeneticsGuy 2 points ago +2 / -0

While I agree, they are likely under long contract and to walk away you'd often have to pay millions, and it would also mean all the people who work on your show under you would lose their jobs in the meantime, or you would at least have to float them until you got a new show.

It's not as simple as uprooting to a new network when your show is responsible for the income of 20, 30, or more families at Fox News, many who have been lifelong friends. The logistics of it all are very difficult. I guarantee you many of them want to but they are hesitant to move for reasons like this. They realize it's bigger than themselves. But, with time, they can devise a strategy to make the move.

2
RiverFenix 2 points ago +2 / -0

So you're saying it's easier to lock the network bosses out of the building and start your own rogue network with the infrastructure and desks/cameras/makeup you liberated from their building into what we're now calling 'your' building. Ta Da, everyone still has a job, except those who don't.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
9
Trumpette2020 9 points ago +9 / -0

We shouldn't be watching Fox news period, except for Tucker and a few others. It has become propaganda! Infiltration to convince Republicans to like Democrat ideas.

8
_Ghost_Void_ 8 points ago +8 / -0

CANCEL FOX!!!

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
Bedminster 6 points ago +6 / -0

Well Rodger we're wayyyy ahead of you on that.

5
VetforTrump 5 points ago +5 / -0

Wallace even might be a pedophile too. Don't let the oliver look fool you. He isn't conservative by a long shot.

3
USAFirst 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can't get some people to turn off the antiAmerican, commie NFL, let alone Fox News. Bunch of lazy, undisciplined, masochistic cuckservatives.

2
Tellguy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Roger is old and it shows rarely. Fox and the entire lamestream media are terminal. Stop wasting energy trying to fix them.

2
de9ebkmd7 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't boycott what I already don't consume.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
4bfd6g5h4df54hgds6f5 2 points ago +2 / -0

CANCEL CABLE AND WATCH TUCKER HERE! https://ustv247.tv/foxnewslive/

I haven't had a single issue watch Tucker.. the stream always seems to be working. (so far)

2
de9ebkmd7 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't boycott what I already don't consume.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
OnionRouter 2 points ago +2 / -0

FuckWallace

2
james43552352345 2 points ago +2 / -0

They should have had Melania Trump being the moderator. She would just ask the questions and then keep quiet with a nice smile on her face.

2
PatrickDuffyLeg 2 points ago +2 / -0

As much as I enjoy Tucker, I’m done with Fox until they deport the snooty shill that is Chris Wallace.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Thearchduke 2 points ago +2 / -0

...sigh...I guess ol' Rog just can't wait for another 50 FBI agents to kick in his door again, can he??

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
pedeypete 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait, when did we end the last five or six FOX news boycotts?

Are we un-boycotting just to boycott again? I missed the memo.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
MyDogCompletesMe 1 point ago +1 / -0

No way I'm ever going to boycott Tucker/Judge Jeanine/Hannity/The5 Pretty much the rest of Fox is cucked.

1
Bestboy143 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've said it before and I'll say it again, Jeb is a mess... also Fox News is a joke.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
quigonkenny 0 points ago +1 / -1

What's that going to do? They'll just replace him with someone else who does the same. He's just playing the part they hired him to. He's not the problem.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-1
japhillips87 -1 points ago +3 / -4

I don't support this. It is cancel culture. Vote with your dollars and don't watch him.