4914
posted ago by Dialectic ago by Dialectic +4914 / -0

Actual question (summarized) with left wing bias: “Wildfires are raging in California, your administration dropped the Paris accord. What will you do to combat climate change?”

Objective question: “Wildfires are raging in California. What do you think caused them, and how could we prevent them to begin with?”

Actual question, left wing bias: “Mr president your administration banned racial sensitivity training. Why is that?”

Objective question: “Mr president what is critical race theory and why did your administration ban it?”

Actual question, left wing bias: “Mr president you said there were fine people at Charlottesville. Will you finally denounce white supremacy?”

Objective question: “Mr president your opponents say you called racists fine people at Charlottesville, and your supporters say you didn’t. Can you explain what happened?”

Actual question, left wing bias: “mr president will you denounce white supremacist groups?”

Objective statement: “my name is Chris Wallace and I’m a complete faggot who asks kindergarten level questions”

Comments (261)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
12
2008RonPaul2012 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yeah I wish trump had been clearer with what was being talked about. I was watching with my in-laws who aren't politically aware, and I'm sure I was the only one who had ever heard of critical race theory. Trump should have said something like, "look if you're going to ask me about it, at least use clear terms. We are talking about Critical Race Theory (look it up), and it is racist, divisive, and destructive, and I won't stand for it." Trump did basically say the second part, which was good. But it's weird watching a debate and understanding the backstory while being surrounded by people who are like "jeez they're both idiots, look how they just talk over each other the whole time."

4
spezisapedo 4 points ago +4 / -0

This was frustrating as hell. Trump needed to be far clearer, and instead it felt like he was talking to his base.

People just saw bickering, and instead of trying to think and research what they said, they will just wait for the MSM to tell them what to think. I heard some idiots last night talking about it, and they were so off base. I tried to explain some of their confusion, but one of the guys was open carrying a gun and I saw him do a drug deal, and once he started getting pissed at me, I decided I didnt want to get shot that night and left.

1
philandy 1 point ago +1 / -0

If only we could do that to the media.