Want to know why they only go back to the 1800s? Because if you go back further their alarmism falls apart. Humans are changing the climate, but not to the extent the alarmists will scare you with.
I argue that regardless of if it is true or not, China and India pollute way more and are never told by scientists to reduce their economies. Regardless if the theory is true, the US shouldn't have to or feel any responsibility to until China does as well. China seems to have an interest in the US shutting down our economy for "settled science"
The global temp has been increasing since the peak of the last ice age. Industrial emissions cover a tiny fraction of the period of time from that peak until now.
Wait for a bright day, drag them outside, and then point at the sun and tell them to google it. Sun activity is directly tied to the earths warming and cooling periods, far more than anything else.
Man is only reponsible for .3 three percent of all carbon emissions on earth. Volcanic activity, both above and below the ocean surface contributes to about 70 percent give or take. None of which is reponsible for the temperature of the surface of the earth which is regulated by solar activity, and the entire spectrum of light energy it produces, as well as water vapor in the air to alleviate the negative affects thereof and helps to sustain our atmosphere.
Trees need carbon dioxide to live. Fact. More carbon dioxide, healthier plants (keep in mind co2 levels are measured in parts per million= # of co2 molecules in their relation to a million other molecules of various types.)without carbon emissions, plants produce no oxygen, which in return is required to sustain animal and human life. Now, given, that too much co2 will kill, or poison rather, plant life as well as human and animal, mankind is incapable of producing it at the volume necessary. Laymans proof would be the industrial revolution. We were pumping more poison into the atmosphere in a few days, than the u.s. does now in a year. I cant remember where i found all this so forgive me, but NASA is a good place to start. Leave out their conclusions, and look at the raw data, and think about it critically. Dont use any sources conclusions to sway your opinion. Use your mind, and raw data only, that is what both are there for.
The fucking sun.
a single volcano can do orders of magnitude more to change the climate than all of humanity has and will do for our entire existence
and there is no way to stop volcanos
Want to know why they only go back to the 1800s? Because if you go back further their alarmism falls apart. Humans are changing the climate, but not to the extent the alarmists will scare you with.
Here are ice cores going back 800,000 years.
I argue that regardless of if it is true or not, China and India pollute way more and are never told by scientists to reduce their economies. Regardless if the theory is true, the US shouldn't have to or feel any responsibility to until China does as well. China seems to have an interest in the US shutting down our economy for "settled science"
https://youtu.be/BA1ia70-oj8
The global temp has been increasing since the peak of the last ice age. Industrial emissions cover a tiny fraction of the period of time from that peak until now.
Wait for a bright day, drag them outside, and then point at the sun and tell them to google it. Sun activity is directly tied to the earths warming and cooling periods, far more than anything else.
Check out heller's site. He has loads of video debunking human caused global warming.
https://realclimatescience.com/
because it is just an obvious attempt from the illuminati to increase themselves
Man is only reponsible for .3 three percent of all carbon emissions on earth. Volcanic activity, both above and below the ocean surface contributes to about 70 percent give or take. None of which is reponsible for the temperature of the surface of the earth which is regulated by solar activity, and the entire spectrum of light energy it produces, as well as water vapor in the air to alleviate the negative affects thereof and helps to sustain our atmosphere. Trees need carbon dioxide to live. Fact. More carbon dioxide, healthier plants (keep in mind co2 levels are measured in parts per million= # of co2 molecules in their relation to a million other molecules of various types.)without carbon emissions, plants produce no oxygen, which in return is required to sustain animal and human life. Now, given, that too much co2 will kill, or poison rather, plant life as well as human and animal, mankind is incapable of producing it at the volume necessary. Laymans proof would be the industrial revolution. We were pumping more poison into the atmosphere in a few days, than the u.s. does now in a year. I cant remember where i found all this so forgive me, but NASA is a good place to start. Leave out their conclusions, and look at the raw data, and think about it critically. Dont use any sources conclusions to sway your opinion. Use your mind, and raw data only, that is what both are there for.