1414
Comments (23)
sorted by:
15
B1ueCo11ar 15 points ago +15 / -0

We know she's a deepstate shill. She looks like someone set her face on fire and put it out with a sack-a-Nichols.

8
NineteenEightyTwo [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

Communists usually do.

9
garmentofpraise 9 points ago +9 / -0

I've been told that the gatekeepers who do the personnel recommendations and who do the actual hiring and firing are all never Trumpers. They won't let any real MAGA patriots through the door. Looks like the president needs to fire all the gatekeepers and start fresh,so we can have people who actually love this country working for it.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
6
IDGAF-DT2020 6 points ago +6 / -0

The corrupted circling the wagons...

3
Phins360_FL 3 points ago +3 / -0

of course it is shes c-eye-aye

3
yallsegregationist 3 points ago +4 / -1

these people ARE the security threat. fire them. i voted Trump because i wanted to hear him say YOU’RE FIRED every day and in that regard I have been sorely disappointed

https://youtu.be/crmvHJpCkfM

2
BabyBuck 2 points ago +3 / -1

Why is a woman the head of the cia?

4
ThePowerOfPrayer 4 points ago +4 / -0

Trump knew threatening to "splinter the C.I.A. in a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds" would be less effective than simply appointing a woman to take over the agency and accomplishing the same thing ahead of schedule and under budget, perhaps?

2
NineteenEightyTwo [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

Diversity hire.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
2
NineteenEightyTwo [S] 2 points ago +4 / -2

Women don't make good leaders.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
RenaissanceOfHope 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lock Haspel Up, abolish the See Why Aye.

2
Kekistani_Ambassador 2 points ago +2 / -0

She looks like that retard that got Roseanne fired.

1
hansgruber7 1 point ago +1 / -0

I love Trump, but in his second term he needs to take a different approach to personnel decisions. He has to make sure people who are loyal to him and support his agenda are in all leadership positions. Especially in DOJ/FBI, and the intelligence community. In my agency, there isn't a single person in my chain of command who supports Trump between me and the Cabinet level appointee.

It's completely unacceptable that we have people like Haspel and Wray in important positions, opposing and defying the President.

1
ltbadpuppy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well yeah, duh. CIA = coverup it all

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
ThePowerOfPrayer 1 point ago +1 / -0

What if they put Gina in charge so the NSA could watch her every move and help them find the needles in the haystack?

taps forehead

It's also telling that Admiral Rogers, the NSA chief who warned Trump about the Obamagate coordinated spying ring left the NSA in 2018 and entered the private sector with Claroty, a company that focuses on OT (Operational Technology) security.

Claroty has been working closely with Department of Homeland Security and has received official recognition for its efforts-

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/claroty-awarded-with-safety-act-approval-by-us-department-of-homeland-security-300955686.html

It appears Admiral Rogers is currently focused on protecting our nation's electrical grid. How will that help foil the Democrat plans to steal the election?

https://blog.claroty.com/protecting-critical-infrastructure-is-especially-important-during-a-crisis

1
IlxTheGreat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hold it, does that seem bad to you? 1st, those interrogations were Outside the US, The Tapes were Outside the US, The intel was outside the US. That's exactly the kind of hard call the CIA Director has to make. Fortunately, She made the call as a Facilities Director w/o waiting for a Washington decision. How could that be bad?

1
mrmrmrj 1 point ago +1 / -0

You cannot become Director of the CIA without lying and covering up shit.

1
SkullLeader1 1 point ago +1 / -0

I knew I recognized that swamp rat.