5472
Comments (286)
sorted by:
281
bellcurvestrikesback 281 points ago +282 / -1

They are preparing to malign trump supporters who take to the streets after a fraudulent election as terrorists

178
Dankbot4000 178 points ago +179 / -1

This exactly. Globalists are trying their hardest to align patriots that want to keep the constitution as terrorists. It won't go well for them like it didn't go well for the British.

80
Chopblock 80 points ago +81 / -1

How the 2nd Amendment applies to militia activity - “necessary to the security of a free State”

https://thedonald.win/p/HEJ3HkTm/all-militia-activities-are-prote/

31
deleted 31 points ago +32 / -1
13
BasteSpuds 13 points ago +14 / -1

I haven't seen anything of foreign involvement but I have seen plausible argument that Mcveigh may have been sheep dipped

13
deleted 13 points ago +14 / -1
14
trump212121 14 points ago +14 / -0

The media ignores Sen Robert Byrd(Dem) WV who was Hillary Clinton's mentor and Joe Biden's good friend. He served in the US senate from 1959-2010 and was not just in the KKK but was the Exalted Cyclops/Grand Kleagle in the Ku Klux Klan. The KKK has been a part of the democratic party since the 1860's.

12
BasteSpuds 12 points ago +12 / -0

I find it suspect that the day of the incident there were reports by the authorities themselves of multiple bombs place throughout the building, people witnessing men in the parking garage with spools of wire days prior. then fast forward and we're told it was just a truck bomb.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 2 points ago +5 / -3

Wow don't be a conspiracy theorist. Why would the MSM and government ever lie!?! Smhlol you're crazy.

7
GoldwaterVoter 7 points ago +7 / -0

I read the book -- VERY convincing:

"In this alarming book, reporter Jayna Davis tells of her amazing journey leading from the smoking rubble of the Murrah Federal Building to the sleazy haunts of John Doe #2, the mysterious Middle East suspect who the Justice Department was at first desperate to find?then insisted never existed."

https://www.amazon.com/Third-Terrorist-Connection-Oklahoma-Bombing/dp/1595552367

27
The_Litehaus_Abides 27 points ago +27 / -0

Christopher Wray is an enemy of the Constitution and of the United States of America. AG Bill Barr has been siding with Wray on this lie and it spells trouble.

"They" are definitely planning to stage a hard coup against our President and want to make US out to be enemy combatants.

Anyone who missed Col. Black's AMA needs to go read it.

edit with AMA https://thedonald.win/p/HY7Oy2QZ/my-name-is-richard-h-black-im-a-/

4
christianknight 4 points ago +4 / -0

They gonna bring the drones out im almost certain. They didnt spend trillions of dollars targetting goat farmers in Afghanistan for nothin.

2
crash7863 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, technically to the British the founding fathers were terrorists as they were in open rebellion. Shit happens though.

49
Cesare_Borgia 49 points ago +50 / -1

This is absolutely true.

44
deleted 44 points ago +44 / -0
46
Formerlurker92 46 points ago +46 / -0

Then they should be on ours

33
magastrophysicist 33 points ago +33 / -0

Always have been.

8
midgetpornrocks 8 points ago +9 / -1

This is why I still have an FB account. I see them all.

1
christianknight 1 point ago +1 / -0

You have glowies on your FB friends list?

1
midgetpornrocks 1 point ago +1 / -0

Decided to get creative and use a six-sided star.

20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
11
squanchingonpao 11 points ago +11 / -0

I don't even need a list, I just need to see excessive soy, lack of hygiene, no self respect, no job.

15
AngeredKabar 15 points ago +15 / -0

That's the low hanging fruitcakes.

The bakers is what these guys are talking about.

1
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 1 point ago +4 / -3

Member that guy that said he had proof of Russian collusion and read a fake transcript of a phone call.

5
MerchantMan99 5 points ago +5 / -0

Exactly. Another is when they open their mouths and spew anti-American rhetoric.

10
SigAR 10 points ago +10 / -0

Put chris Wallace on it!

As a matter of fact I dont think it would be uncivilized or uncalled for for us to have a list at this point. Sure we dont know the names of many, but those that we do know should know that their actions make them worthy of the List.

8
Ronald_Dregan 8 points ago +8 / -0

yay!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
SigAR 3 points ago +3 / -0

They want to send us to a FEMA camp paaarrrrttttttyyyy!!

27
RonJoner 27 points ago +27 / -0

You may own a gun without state approval

You may assemble without state approval

Therefore a group of organized, armed people may arise without state approval, indeed, it is necessary to the security of a free state. This is really the heart of the second amendment. Since the people are free of the State, the State isn't gonna protect you. Your security is in your own hands - flip side of freedom.

33
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 33 points ago +33 / -0

They already malign us and call us terrorists, and we haven't even done anything.

32
deleted 32 points ago +32 / -0
13
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 13 points ago +13 / -0

Correct.

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
15
ReclaimYourDestiny 15 points ago +15 / -0

They could also steal the election.

Then once Trump leaves office arrest him with bullshit Mueller conjured up charges.

They really think we're going to let them steal the election then arrest our President?

Stand back and Stand by :)

4
befehlistbefehl 4 points ago +4 / -0

They really think we're going to let them steal the election then arrest our President?

The reason they believe that is because they have almost never personally faced any kind of consequence for their crimes. For instance, how many house seats were stolen in the 2018 midterms? Did anyone face any justice for the theft, legal or vigilante?

The fact of the matter is they still don't believe that we will go full Kyle Rittenhouse on them. I mean, we still have conservatives here saying "he shouldn't have been there." How many people were saying that the Proud Boys were walking right into a trap by going to Portland? The fact of the matter is anyone who harms a conservative is a hero to the left, and they celebrate him and his actions, and usually do their best to help him. Do we celebrate anyone who harms a leftist, regardless of whether or not it's justified or not? A theoretical example here: a nonwhite shoots up a white church, killing 50 people, will the left celebrate the action and call the shooter a hero? With a few exceptions, Yes absolutely. How about the reverse scenario, did the right celebrate the action and call the shooter a hero? With very few exceptions, No never.

TLDR: the left thinks they can get away with anything because they historically have and the right never cheers violence against leftists, whereas they never condemn violence against deplorables.

4
ValleyForge 4 points ago +4 / -0

I saw people on the left celebrating after the Las Vegas shooting because a lot of country music fans are conservative.

1
befehlistbefehl 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep. And how many people on the right did you see celebrating the Christchurch shooting? I only know one person who celebrated that, and he is not so much on the right as against the left (who hates him because he is straight, Christian, White, and male).

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
Rufus_Shinra 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, yes they do. They will blatantly steal the election by counting votes for however long it takes in swing states. The fake ballots are already made up and they are ready to go. This will happen as sure as you're a Trump supporter. The left cannot allow Trump to stay in office. It will take a United effort to stop them.

-5
deleted -5 points ago +1 / -6
6
ReclaimYourDestiny 6 points ago +6 / -0

Trump employs over 20,000 people and his companies pay tens of millions of dollars in taxes.

This entire tax scandal is about his personal, federal income tax. Many CEO's take very little salary, their holdings are in their corporations. The Trump companies and assets pay tens of millions of $$$ a year.

But the media simplifies complicated tax issues to "durr durr $750!!" and you idiots just swallow it right up.

3
roytheboy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Damn, is this true, are there other ceos who with similar taxes? I've been ignoring the tax angle cause I don't really care, but if there are some examples I'd love to throw those in a few lib faces that I know

1
ReclaimYourDestiny 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump is more than a CEO. He literally owns the company. So he can give himself however much money he wants. He could sell his company and take a bath in the cash if he wanted.

Trump's companies and corporations pay tens of millions $$$$ in taxes.

Trump's personal, federal tax return is not relevant. It's relevant for people who make $80k a year salary. Not a guy who owns hundreds of companies and other ventures.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
17
midgetpornrocks 17 points ago +17 / -0

They're also preparing to add racism as a mental disorder, therefore making anyone associated with a militia a racist, and therefore keeping them from passing background checks for the acquisition of firearms.

5
bellcurvestrikesback 5 points ago +5 / -0

EXACTLY THIS

4
zooty 4 points ago +4 / -0

And we all know what passes as racist to these people.

15
Gmama2 15 points ago +15 / -0

They believe all Trump supporters are white supremecists.

115
UpdootVeteran 115 points ago +116 / -1

See I caught that too - he added that and it’s bull shit

67
Ez_mac 67 points ago +68 / -1

Right?! It’s literally the second amendment! I hate how these slimy fucks try to shame and mindfuck people into eliminating the Bill of Rights.

“a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state”

12
DonJr2032 12 points ago +13 / -1

It's a literal sleezebag move that shows ultimate bias. I wish would have called him out for it.

39
Tejas_Pepe 39 points ago +41 / -2

POTUS did a poor job answering this question. It was an opportunity to red pill a lot of people about the Proud Boys, Militias and the lies being told about them. I hope someone on his staff informs him better on this.

19
I_Love_45-70_Gov 19 points ago +20 / -1

I think he was attempting to avoid supporting Chrissy's narrative: militias = white supremacy.

With all the flack from both Uncle Sniffy and Chrissy, I can understand his frustration and missed opportunities in that "debate."

6
Tejas_Pepe 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah, it was obviously two against one. I'm for tossing the current debate schedule and only have one more. Have a panel of moderators - Joe Rogan- Tim Pool- Jimmy Dore- Dan Bongino- Tucker Carlson - all ask two, three questions each.

Get some modern, actual media in there instead of highly biased fake media elites who are in league with the uni-party.

4
synd1050 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think he was rusty but he still delivered but allowed Biden to live for another debate. Trump needs race realists in his administration.his administration needs that as he won 2016 on a populist platform;this would help him a lot. Lot of civnats and neocons in his administration won’t be willing to say things as they are.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
16
Chopblock 16 points ago +16 / -0

Are you willing tonight to condemn fake news propaganda and free speech?

10
Snake 10 points ago +10 / -0

White supremacy isn't a group. It's not an umbrella organization. There is no leadership. There are no members.

Wallace asked for a GROUP engaging in violent activity and asked Trump if he would tell them to stand down. The idea that Trump hasn't condemned white supremacists is ridiculous enough considering how many times he's already done it, but it's even more ridiculous because of the question Wallace asked. Was he supposed to answer a question they didn't ask? White supremacists isn't a group.

This is my opinion: Trump wanted one of his opponents (Biden or Wallace) to ask about the KKK so he could explain that he was labeling them as a terrorist organization, something that no previous president has done.

Trump pressed the two to name a group, and they decided to bring up an Afro-Cuban-led group, the Proud Boys. Even though Trump doesn't know much about them, it doesn't matter. Trump doesn't want violence period, so he told them to stand back/stand by.

-5
synd1050 -5 points ago +4 / -9

I don’t know why Trump is even designating Kkk as a terrorist group;it is a weak policy and won’t help us a lot.Trump needs race realists and people who know the inner workings of this group to be on his administration.

5
ChrisSuperDude 5 points ago +6 / -1

The thing is the KKK have been a terrorist organization since the Harding days. Technically he didn't declare them one he more just reaffirmed the point. It's like his other condemnations of white supremacy, not entirely needed but in his mind it would look good in the papers and on tv if the media wasn't Hitler and would report the actual news.

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
5
Tejas_Pepe 5 points ago +5 / -0

Proper answer to that question would be "You should ask the Democrats because they have always been the party of the KKK, Jim Crow and the Confederacy".

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
christianknight 1 point ago +2 / -1

Its also serious policy that allowed the glow boys to infiltrate more easily. The problem is anyone anti government = kkk and is about to get further screwed by the glowies.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
christianknight 0 points ago +1 / -1

I dont roll with racists. Im not white so they wouldn't want me anyways.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
3
MerchantMan99 3 points ago +3 / -0

People talk about the KKK as if they march down American streets on a regular basis. As if burning crosses and lynchings happen as often as Chicago shootings. As an organization, they are all but dead and have zero chance of ever making some type of comeback.

3
havax 3 points ago +3 / -0

you could practically see the salivation dripping from biden's mouth as he begged trump to say it, say proud boys, say it

disgusting pedophile

3
Fabius 3 points ago +3 / -0

He's a coward.

82
Mr_Deplorable 82 points ago +83 / -1

Militias are the only thing standing between the globalist and total world dominance so they need to associate them as a racist hate group. The only thing leftists are good at is mental gymnastics. It's pretty incredible actually.

38
Pepe 38 points ago +39 / -1

which is interesting because "militia" can be any group of people. it's not like there's one giant US militia.

28
deleted 28 points ago +29 / -1
9
deleted 9 points ago +12 / -3
19
AngeredKabar 19 points ago +19 / -0

I am the militia.

It's even codified in Federal law. I meet the requirements.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
3
christianknight 3 points ago +3 / -0

It was. Its been federalized and is now just another branch with ties to a state.

3
trollkin0331 3 points ago +3 / -0

This. Anything under direct control of the government is no longer a militia. It's the ultimate conflict of interest.

5
electioninfection 5 points ago +5 / -0

Black Panther party is a militia. So, yeah.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
52
AlphaNathan 52 points ago +53 / -1

Lin Wood has entered the chat

32
MythArcana 32 points ago +33 / -1

White supremacy is a conspiracy theory. KKK was a Democrat-run organization. Will Wallace disavow?

12
Icepck 12 points ago +12 / -0

As Biden could say: Hate isn't a group, it's an idea. Come on, man.

See, he can say that for antifa but not for white supremacy, and I don't understand their double standard on that. They can wrap the militias (mostly peaceful) in with the KKK types, but they totally see a difference between protesters and rioters. It is daft. Talk badly about rioters and they defend protesters (they don't see a difference at that point), talk good about militias and they say you support racists. I don't enjoy it.

8
Tx50bmg 8 points ago +8 / -0

You don’t understand their double standard? Stop applying logic and morality to those who have neither.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
5
Tx50bmg 5 points ago +5 / -0

Haven’t heard that one before, but it’s perfect.

4
MythArcana 4 points ago +4 / -0

Militias can't be hate groups because they love their guns and love shooting them with their buddies. It's all about love, man! 🔫💕

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
MythArcana 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's one of those Exalted Cyclops or Mad Minotaur things I keep hearing about. 😂

27
AlphaNathan 27 points ago +30 / -3

They'll go broke doing this. Let them.

33
deleted 33 points ago +34 / -1
11
deleted 11 points ago +13 / -2
36
deleted 36 points ago +36 / -0
12
cjcivicx 12 points ago +12 / -0

If they didn't do it while Obama was decimating this country they won't do it if Trump loses.

They just like to talk tough.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
5
GODGAMER 5 points ago +8 / -3

2 judges?

they'll pack it with 5, 10, 20, 100.

They literally lie and cheat in the open every single day, and people on our side still want to play fair.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
cjcivicx 2 points ago +2 / -0

Whats dangerous about it? These tough talking retards have never been in a fight where they couldn't yell "STOP".

Just a bunch of wannabe Rambos that have never been anywhere near the military, but play a lot of Call of Duty...

I say that because just under 1% of the US have served, but a lot more like to talk like they did.

2
cluckingducks 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is an amazingly small percentage considering the number of veterans I know. 3.3 million served?

5
MerchantMan99 5 points ago +5 / -0

The real problem is that I haven't seen anything to suggest that the majority of "patriots" will do anything other than roll over.

Only because the threat is so subtle. It's not like Pearl Harbor just got bombed and we are being invaded. It's been a slow brainwashing of American youth for the last 50 years. What are militias supposed to do? Start taking over schools and universities?

But this time, the threat is much less subtle. Expect a lot of patriots to come out of the woodwork if Trump isn't president on Jan 21st.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
christianknight 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Pearl Harbor just got bombed and we are being invaded."

The deep state can arrange that to make sure patriots dont point guns at them. Taking bets on China getting framed.

5
I_Love_45-70_Gov 5 points ago +5 / -0

The difference between law-abiding patriots and commie democrats is that patriots always obey the laws.

If the the commies are successful at stealing this election, all bets are off. There is literally no reason to hold back since laws no longer matter.

4
grndmrshlgando 4 points ago +4 / -0

it hasn't gotten to the point where its a full on shoot your way out scenario. the unrest and tyranny has been limited mainly to democrat ruined cities across the country. and trump will deploy the military to occupy cities before any real fighting begins

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
23
AtariArtist 23 points ago +25 / -2

Scott Adams believed that shit too.

Fuck Scott Adams.

9
electioninfection 9 points ago +10 / -1

He was definitely going contrarian yesterday. I'm sure he'll be back to diluted red pill status within a day or two.

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
3
rootGoose 3 points ago +3 / -0

I would have liked to have seen Trump quick response like you described and pivot right into:

Why the violence exists.

3
Chopblock 3 points ago +4 / -1

How is — ‘Sure. Name a group. Stand down... but it’s the Left... Antifa’ — NOT exactly what you described?

1
rootGoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

That word, “exactly,” it doesn’t mean what you think it means.

1
Chopblock 1 point ago +2 / -1

Here’s an actual transcript WITH all the crosstalk. You can see a few things:

  • Your ideal version would have been broken up into meaningless fragments, whereas Trump got his message across.

  • Trump had to adjust moment-by-moment as they tried to cut him off and redefine the terms.

  • Trump was following your ideal except in a better order with key points up front.

  • Trump verbally identified Antifa as a Militia.

https://thedonald.win/p/HYCCTa1H/this-nonsanitized-transcript-of-/

0
alienjesus 0 points ago +1 / -1

I missed what Scott said, any cliff notes?

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
20
South_Florida_Guy 20 points ago +21 / -1

Yes! I've been saying this ever since he said it: "will you denounce people who think Whites are superior and also those that use their Constitutional, God-given rights?"

Look at Wallace's "early life" section on wikipedia if you want your simple explanation, however.

6
Deaduponaviral 6 points ago +6 / -0

Then after that mosey on down to his personal life and you’ll find the grabbler has been a registered democrat for over two decades. Lol.

5
Spirit_of_Resistance 5 points ago +5 / -0

When looking at those who cause global strife

Take a look at the Early Life

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
6
Spirit_of_Resistance 6 points ago +6 / -0

I think Henry Ford said it best

the international jew the world's foremost problem

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
synd1050 1 point ago +2 / -1

E.S.T

19
strawberryismyjam 19 points ago +19 / -0

I want Biden to condem white supremacists and planned parenthood.

3
Maker_Wolf 3 points ago +3 / -0

Brilliant.

16
covfefe-time 16 points ago +16 / -0

And yet Kamala Harris is free to praise Antifa, and the destructive, violent riots, and says 'THEY SHOULD NOT AND WILL NOT END.' Biden too. Calls Antifa an Idea.

Now, how is this not questioned or worthy of debate?

She gets the Democrat pussy pass, and is free to literally call for violence and blood in the streets like MANY other prominent democrats, and the media and republicucks are all ho hum about it.

13
GitmObama 13 points ago +13 / -0

GO ON OFFENSE, FFS!!!!!

13
ca18det 13 points ago +13 / -0

Militias are our Constitutionally enshrined birthright. It's far past time to be vocal and critical in discussions you have in everyday life. Call out all commies and anti Americans as soon as they speak out against America. They are determined to associate militias with oppression and patriotism with racism. Never defend, always go on offense in debates for their open subversion and hatred of our country.

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
12
Tejas_Pepe 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yeah, the population of this nation has become so fucking stupid and willingly led like sheep by the MSM that it might be best for the nation to crumble and something worthwhile built in it's place. I really have little hope for the current situation. When Militias and Proud Boys are portrayed as racist organizations, with no push back, it's probably too late.

7
MerchantMan99 7 points ago +7 / -0

Of course they are. A huge swath of Americans are dumb as shit. Just look at any Will Witt video.

The California governor himself is so fucking dumb, he thinks the wildfires are caused by climate change. And millions of others believe him. And if you can fall for that, then you can fall for anything.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Spirit_of_Resistance 2 points ago +2 / -0

This manipulation is a long time in the making. Look at who owns every type of media we've all been exposed to our whole lives

11
YourTendiesWillBurn 11 points ago +11 / -0

The only problem with militias is that there's not anywhere near enough. I'd like to see them in every community.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
10
MAGAbeast2016 10 points ago +10 / -0

I am in a very large militia group in New Hampshire and his comments pissed us off. He does not realize that we can honestly have over 10,000 heavily armed and well trained patriots in D.C. protecting Donald Trump and emptying the swamp as the founding fathers suggested from time to time.

DON’T poke the bear, Chris.

1
christianknight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hello fellow white sup cough I mean militiaman...

10
farstriderr 10 points ago +10 / -0

Is that like the big group of black people with guns roaming around recently who shot themselves by accident? That militia group?

https://www.firearmsnews.com/editorial/nfac-militia-at-stone-mountain/378669

10
malooch 10 points ago +10 / -0

600+ bodies in chicago this year and he's talking about proud boys. disgraceful

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
9
iVote 9 points ago +9 / -0

It’s up to freedom loving patriotic Americans to vote out every democrat on November 3rd and every election to follow if we want to end this 🤡🌎 bullshit once and for all. The ability to rid them of power lies with the citizens.

9
OranjeBlanjeBlou 9 points ago +10 / -1

They learned that they can undermine any good, patriotic thing by linking it to “white supremacy.” They dont have to prove anything, just get people to associate the terms and they win.

The only way we beat this is to take away the stigma of the label “white supremacy.”

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
Drazhya 0 points ago +1 / -1

Nope.

  1. If we let them associate whatever with whatever, then taking away their latest toy means nothing. They'll find another.

  2. You cannot judge people primarily by their conduct and also primarily by their race, and the good way is the former, not the latter. The repentant will find forgiveness, and the unrepentant, hell. For that, I will always hold stigma against white supremacists.

  3. The big problem is that the right, by and large, has accepted the left's assertion that they should not be condemned for things they are proud of. If a right argues with a left about Ginsberg, and then the left says that Ginsberg is admired and they're proud of her, then the right (in my experience) immediately drops the subject and sulks, rather than leveling condemnation against them. Most christians have been fooled into thinking this non-judging behavior is actually how they should act.

However...

  1. Racism, even ideological racism is hyped beyond sanity. Sin it may be, but great it is not. It's quite minor in the grand scheme of things.

  2. The demand to condemn racism by the left extends beyond anti-tribalism (note: this is not the definition of bigotry. Bigotry is being strongly for or against beliefs as well as tribes. To be a non-bigot you cannot believe anything strongly. Another example of leftist corruption of our language.) to anti-pattern-recognition, which is evil.

0
OranjeBlanjeBlou 0 points ago +1 / -1

Just be clear about this- the left does not condemn racism. The left only condemns White people doing what everyone else does- look out for people who who share their biological heritage.

There is nothing wrong with doing this. All of nature and all of biology is genes competing with other genes. If every other genetically similar group fights for themselves and one group does not, that one loses out.

9
arturia 9 points ago +9 / -0

He'd rather everyone be disarmed so the overlords can dictate without worry to us unwashed massed.

7
MainstreamDeviant 7 points ago +7 / -0

Chris Wallace pees sitting down

Edit: confirmed

8
chelthing 8 points ago +8 / -0

And shits after a shower

3
Cyer6 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wait a sec, the 3 tenets of every guy's morning is...

Shit, Shower and Shave

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
lanevorocks 7 points ago +7 / -0

Biden only accepted the interview at Fox because Wallace is a Democrat. I can't imagine Biden ever talking with Trump with a conservative moderator. What a weak guy ... Trump FTW

7
CL1984 7 points ago +7 / -0

Media bias in full display

White supremacists, militias and Proud Boys bunched together in a 3 second gotcha question with both MSM tool Wallace and deep state lizard Biden hanging up on Trump

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
6
Gmama2 6 points ago +6 / -0

If it is white supremecists and militia, why aren't Democrat mayors and governors stopping them from destroying predominately minority neighborhoods?

6
Maker_Wolf 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah I was furious about that question. Allowing for militias is literally the stated reason for the 2nd amendment.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
PanderjitSingh 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s not a coincidence that all the best countries were founded, built, and run by people of European origin. It’s so obvious I’m always amazed when people pretend it isn’t so.

5
sustainable_saltmine 5 points ago +5 / -0

(yes, he is. He is one of those who thinks we militias shouldn't exist because he thinks it give people an excuse to form an armed group of "right wing lynch mobs" that terrorize people when they don't get what they want...kind of like what BLM and Antifa do...)

5
deleted 5 points ago +9 / -4
4
BigDick_Don45 4 points ago +4 / -0

“The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed.” ― Thomas Jefferson

4
PropagandaWizard1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

They want Americans disarmed. Virginia tried to make it illegal to participate in weapons training or any militia activity. Imagine how much easier and farther the lock downs could go with no 2nd Amendment. That's their master plan. Disarm, weaken, and conquer.

4
FUCK_DemonRATS 4 points ago +4 / -0

If a civil war ever erupted, the media would be the first to go

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
Doubld 4 points ago +4 / -0

As a proud American, I cherish the Civil Rights as stated in our Constitution. The left has no idea what denying Americans those rights will trigger.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Scumbag-reddit 3 points ago +3 / -0

but the president didn't condemn white supremacists!

Says the idiot as they ignore President Trump's terrorist designation of the KKK

3
Throwawaycuzmeh 3 points ago +3 / -0

They basically asked Trump if he disavows white supremacy and the second amendment.

Ask Biden if he disavows white supremacy and the first amendment.

3
covfefe-time 3 points ago +3 / -0

THE MEDIA ARE THE TRUE SUPREMACISTS IN THIS COUNTRY.

They hold themselves ABOVE and ACCOUNTABLE TO NO ONE, aside from their STRICT AND UNQUESTIONABLE AUTHORITY.

THEY ARE THE SUPREMACISTS WHO ARE DIVIDING THIS COUNTRY ACCORDING TO RACE AND SKIN COLOR ABOVE ALL ELSE.

3
Thingthing22 3 points ago +4 / -1

Trump could've broken down the question and answered those things separately. Yes I condemn white supremacy. Google all the videos of me already having done that. And I still do today. And no I can't condemn something that is a constitutional protected right.. militias (unless they're a demonstrated threat). He should've said he didn't know the proud boys but because he didn't it's no wonder he said what he said.

3
sparlitz 3 points ago +3 / -0

I honestly think Trump thought he was being coerced into saying something he would later regret and was playing it safe. I think he was sensing another "will you concede the election" like in 2016 and felt he was being pressured into saying what the Left want him to say.

3
Thingthing22 3 points ago +3 / -0

He's very good at recognizing that but he's bad at breaking down the question based on interviewing knowledge and rules (he's not a journalist and shouldn't have to but they've weaponized their own rules against a boogey man enemy that doesn't exist). If he did, he'd be appealing to the invisible layer of criticism. That said, I'm not interested in him changing because no one should have to jump through "fuck you" hoops to want to do good and be productive with friendly competition. It's fucking retarded.

3
I_Love_45-70_Gov 3 points ago +3 / -0

Agreed.

It's also time to oust the legacy "media" from the WH press briefings, as well. Bring in on-line outlets and personalities.

Pravda needs to be put down and buried for good.

3
bck- 3 points ago +3 / -0

Chris Wallace is a giant fucking faggot and Trump shows him too much respect when they interact.

3
vacu 3 points ago +3 / -0

These people are sick and evil.

3
TheRealPizzaPope 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not a debate: asking a candidate to denounce or applaud something is not a question a moderator should ever ask. That is a request not an inquiry or hypothetical question.

3
xchamp777 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is, by far, the most unreported piece of this entire exchange. Trump's answer of not categorically condemning militia groups (a right literally guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment) is the correct answer to this question. Apparently, only Trump was listening to the actual question—sharper than anyone in the room, again.

3
SendThemBackToCanada 3 points ago +3 / -0

Clearly he's calling out the John Brown Gun Club who provided security for CHAZ!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
stratocaster_patriot 3 points ago +3 / -0

I picked up on this very acutely. Mr. President will you disavow the second amendment? Antifa is an idea; oh that's just fine. White supremacy and the 2A need to be denounced because gee those aren't ideas./s I wonder, can anyone give me any evidence that white supremacists and militias have done ANYTHING to create and exacerbate any of the problems our country is now facing. I mean real problems, not imaginary ones like systemic racism.

3
Ham_Sandwich77 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fun fact: In Canada, "The Militia" is the semi-official term for the Army Reserve. Methinks Wallace doesn't know what the word "Militia" means. And that's a problem because he's trying to speak with authority about s subject he has no understanding of in front of millions of viewers.

3
Zude 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've never in my life had a better understanding of the necessity of and appreciation for militias.