5472
Comments (286)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
39
Tejas_Pepe 39 points ago +41 / -2

POTUS did a poor job answering this question. It was an opportunity to red pill a lot of people about the Proud Boys, Militias and the lies being told about them. I hope someone on his staff informs him better on this.

19
I_Love_45-70_Gov 19 points ago +20 / -1

I think he was attempting to avoid supporting Chrissy's narrative: militias = white supremacy.

With all the flack from both Uncle Sniffy and Chrissy, I can understand his frustration and missed opportunities in that "debate."

6
Tejas_Pepe 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah, it was obviously two against one. I'm for tossing the current debate schedule and only have one more. Have a panel of moderators - Joe Rogan- Tim Pool- Jimmy Dore- Dan Bongino- Tucker Carlson - all ask two, three questions each.

Get some modern, actual media in there instead of highly biased fake media elites who are in league with the uni-party.

4
synd1050 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think he was rusty but he still delivered but allowed Biden to live for another debate. Trump needs race realists in his administration.his administration needs that as he won 2016 on a populist platform;this would help him a lot. Lot of civnats and neocons in his administration won’t be willing to say things as they are.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0