1891
Comments (37)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
PraiseBeToScience 3 points ago +3 / -0

The evidence it wasn't John Roberts of the Supreme Court is that he was in DC... In court... That day.

3
redstampede 3 points ago +3 / -0

Roberts' tendency to cave when it's most important not to makes it look like he's being blackmailed about something, though.

3
PraiseBeToScience 3 points ago +3 / -0

He could just be a pussy-whipped bitch though.

1
redstampede 1 point ago +1 / -0

For his bad rulings he should be whipped with an Acosta.

1
lmao 1 point ago +1 / -0

okay that's probably true, but you still said that without evidence

2
PraiseBeToScience 2 points ago +2 / -0

FIrst of all, the burden of evidence is on you. You're the one making claims. There's a billion John Roberts's in America. You don't even have evidence that this is Justice John Roberts. None. "I don't like his decisions" isn't evidence.

But I'll entertain you.

So here's a picture of the log.

http://stateofthenation.co/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/sl1qAODQVgMpKXljGcqYoq76111leJrFnUKFzHdCRL00czD6PhkqvP3Y1sQEIF0iF8rKj8hrCSpSiga-4Bq41BTstwi5SWyAkidN5X8wLQgJGM8XEO9vojEk0Xy8FhnXOWwjs0-d-e1-ft-1.jpg

Start with the fact that the record is PEB to TBI. That's Palm Beach, CA to Teterboro, NJ. Not to Epstein's island.

https://www.bing.com/search?q=teb+airport&PC=U316&FORM=CHROMN
https://www.bing.com/search?q=pbi%20airport&qs=n&form=QBRE&sp=-1&ghc=1&pq=pbi&sc=8-3&sk=&cvid=D0D8B7E225974D96AC3EF0C4F60D4D86

Proceed to the fact that the registration number N530GA isn't owned by Epstein, it's TWA. Literally a commercial flight.

https://flightaware.com/resources/registration/N530GA

Lastly, February 10, 2011 was a busy day for the court.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-6549.htm
https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-9260.htm
https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-1293.htm
https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-929.htm
https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-444.htm
https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-804.htm
https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-1295.htm
https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-930.htm

Why would John Roberts literally leave on a Thursday to run off to pedo-island on a fucking work-week for the court? He couldn't wait for Friday night or a weekend?

So, to recap.

  1. The Supreme Court was in session on that day,

  2. It wasn't Epstein's plane,

  3. It didn't go to Epstein's island.


So what is your evidence to the contrary besides an INCREDIBLY COMMON NAME written on a piece of paper?

1
lmao 1 point ago +1 / -0

FIrst of all, the burden of evidence is on you. You're the one making claims. There's a billion John Roberts's in America. You don't even have evidence that this is Justice John Roberts. None. "I don't like his decisions" isn't evidence.

You don't understand. I didn't claim anything, but I did consider any john roberts possible. Only you made a claim: that it wasn't the justice, but you didn't provide evidence to support your claim, until now, which I do appreciate.