4241
Comments (330)
sorted by:
244
deleted 244 points ago +245 / -1
108
muy_libre 108 points ago +109 / -1

Just wrote this in another comment, but, unfortunately for Pelosi, it doesn't matter. If there's an electoral college tie, it's decided in the house, but not by simple majority. Each state delegation gets 1 vote. Meaning, all of the representatives from California get 1 collective vote, all of the representatives from Wyoming get 1 collective vote, etc. 50 total votes. Most states are Republican.

If it goes to the house, Trump wins.

68
Regnad_2720 68 points ago +68 / -0

Came here to say this. I believe 26 or 27 states have majority Republican in their delegations. Thus R's Vote 26 to 24.

Once again the dems are foiled by an Electoral College style system where most of their delegation all come from the same high population states thus balancing that power with less populated regions.

46
stratocaster_patriot 46 points ago +47 / -1

I wish a reporter would ask Pelosi if she thinks she is smarter than the founders and just let the answer speak for itself.

16
deleted 16 points ago +17 / -1
5
Demonspawn 5 points ago +5 / -0

The other issue is that the cucks can nominate whoever they want and the house can vote for them

They have to choose from the top 3 from the electoral college results.

7
CannonballJunior 7 points ago +7 / -0

Currently it's 26 R and 22 D.

1 delegation tied, and a 2nd delegation expected to be tied (the L would join the R's resulting in a tie).

2
Frogleg2 2 points ago +2 / -0

What happens with territories like Puerto Rico and gaum

9
capefog 9 points ago +9 / -0

No vote, as God intended.

3
CannonballJunior 3 points ago +3 / -0

They have no vote.

2
Frogleg2 2 points ago +2 / -0

thank you

2
CannonballJunior 2 points ago +2 / -0

¡De nada!

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
2
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hope this happens just for the young turks reaction vids it would spawn.

45
The_Litehaus_Abides 45 points ago +45 / -0

Bongino addressed this (yesterday?) and said Pelosi's plan is to "take" the House again, only with a bigger majority.

Then she would stall it until early January so her new House can win the vote. The House is sworn in earlier than the President.

Not a single damn thing was done about her stealing the House in 2018 (thanks Ronna) so she's planning on doing it again.

Dan stressed how important it is to vote ALL Republican down-ballot because of this plot of hers.

21
muy_libre 21 points ago +22 / -1

Yeah, they'll try to do whatever they can, but even if they maintain or expand their majority, the odds that they take over the majority of the state delegations is slim to none.

Still, vote straight red! (not that I expect anyone here to do otherwise)

20
The_Litehaus_Abides 20 points ago +20 / -0

We need a BIG landslide. You know how Soros has been going after the swing states. Holy shit, he belongs in Gitmo.

You're right, though. Straight red vote all the way down.

14
ClownTamer 14 points ago +14 / -0

That’s what I’m doing. I’m independent but like Trump. I’d much rather hand everything over to republicans this time though, even if plenty of them are D bags like Romney. Give Trump everything we can. Weed out the deep state types. Secure the Supreme Court. Then throw the Clintons and Obama and Biden and all of them in fucking jail.

6
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 6 points ago +6 / -0

New Republican slogan to attract independents:

Republicans: we won't burn your city down!

2
Colonel_Chestbridge 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, the primaries are over. We’ve got what we’ve got, and any R is better than a D

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
1
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 1 point ago +1 / -0

We have 26 states that are immune to Dem fuckery because of our numbers. Once again Geotus crushes lefty dreams like conan the barbarian. Anybody tired of winning?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 1 point ago +1 / -0

From what I heard in an admittedly brief report, their are weak reps, but not enough to take us below 26 states.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
9
The_Litehaus_Abides 9 points ago +9 / -0

I know, it's infuriating. I'll never forget Paul Ryan, happy as hell, welcoming new House members that he knew got there through fraud.

And he was supposed to be a Republican. I always called him a Democrat, though. Always.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
ObjectiveReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

If a President isn't decided by January, the Speaker fills their duties until one is.

I think that is the far more likely plan.

Once Nancy has the Executive, she can bring an end to a number of stalled/investigated state fraud cases as no one in the upper echelons of the investigatory agencies are going to balk at her order to stand down.

Which is why this will come down to the supreme court. Because there WILL be fraud, the investigatory agencies WILL stall or conveniently see nothing while you wave it in their faces, and Nancy WILL try to assume the duties of the President and eject Trump from the white house and he WILL NOT comply.

The Supreme Court is the only thing that can prevent a hot civil war, and even that may not be enough.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
11
UpTrump 11 points ago +11 / -0

Let's take Washington as an example. I believe the majority of reps are Republicans, even though Dems control the state. Would their sole vote be for Trump?

11
Formerlurker92 11 points ago +11 / -0

Depends on how rino the Republicans feel that day

10
muy_libre 10 points ago +11 / -1

^this, but it's entirely plausible that WA would go for Trump in that scenario. Could you imagine the salt levels? KEK!

10
TrumpVictorious 10 points ago +10 / -0

The representatives vote on which way the state will vote. Blue state republicans may face pressure to vote Biden if their state went for Biden, but the same might be true for red state Dems.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
1
dye_cis_scum 1 point ago +1 / -0

Biden will not last 4 years. The House would decide the president, but the Senate decides Vice President. This means even in the unlikely scenario the House broke the tie, the GOP keeps the Senate and then picks Pence as VP. Pence would be president within 4 years and Trump could be Pence's VP once Biden is outed as being mentally unfit for office. Trump could then run in 2024.

3
PB_Mack 3 points ago +3 / -0

Typically the state legislatures hold a vote and tell their delegation how to vote.

1
M8kMdlErthGr8Again 1 point ago +1 / -0

But they don't hold power over the vote.

1
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes they would. The salt will be glorious!!!!!

8
Meme_Too 8 points ago +8 / -0

Most states are Republican.

Now they are, but the new Congress is seated on Jan. 3, and the Democrats are going to steal (ala Ilhan Omar's ballot harvesting machine) enough seats to give them a majority.

This must be stopped.

2
Spirit_of_Resistance 2 points ago +2 / -0

Either Trump wins or its total war. I refuse to survive in their world

1
M3CJC 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well correct me if I’m wrong but one would think if the presidency is being challenged wouldn’t the house/senate as well?

5
PanderjitSingh 5 points ago +5 / -0

Maybe they’ll hold their own simple majority vote and have the media cover only that. Social media have already announced they will censor reports of a win by President Trump.

104
deleted 104 points ago +104 / -0
65
DemsFuckKids 65 points ago +65 / -0

*Feinstein has entered the chat *also Lindsey Graham

25
ProphetOfKek 25 points ago +25 / -0

Don’t forget Mittens.

15
Flipbarryfromreddit 15 points ago +16 / -1

HOW IS THE ELECTION DECIDED IN THE HOUSE AND NOT THE SENATE. WTF????? ALSO WHY WE’RE AT IT, HOW IS A FORMER INTERN OF BIDEN THAT HE REGULARLY HANGS OUT W THE MODERATOR OF THE NEXT DEBATE. WTF???? https://twitter.com/ronaldinhousa/status/1311768018763034624?s=21 TRUMP SHOULD’VE FORCED THEM TO HAVE AT LEAST ONE CONSERVATIVE AS A MODERATOR. I bashed the fuck outta the TDS cunt who’s moderating the 3rd one btw https://twitter.com/ronaldinhousa/status/1311613939000766467?s=21 https://twitter.com/ronaldinhousa/status/1311613489493012481?s=21 https://twitter.com/ronaldinhousa/status/1311614581832388615?s=21 https://twitter.com/ronaldinhousa/status/1311614677231730690?s=21

27
Sky_Boss 27 points ago +27 / -0

The election is not decided "In the House". It is voted on by each individual states House, so each state equals 1 vote. The GOP controls the majority of states houses.

8
R_e_d_d_a_w_n 8 points ago +9 / -1

She is going to destroy the integrity of the election and when they can't choose a president she will invoke the 20th amendment and assume control of the executive branch.

Note: this amendment was added in 1933. Communists using an FDR (commie) era amendment to overthrow the government.

We've been setup much longer than most think.

Edit: changed typo from involve to invoke

3
usdodsgssog 3 points ago +3 / -0

This country shall one day be filled with Trump statues and Joseph McCarthy statues in honor of them both.

3
Magafactured 3 points ago +3 / -0

And fuck Fox News. That article was highly biased, and represented her claim that “Trump is a white supremacist“ with no disclaimer whatsoever.

Fox News also had an article today focusing on Josh Brolin, and why he says that it should be fine that Dwayne Johnson endorses Biden, and Josh Brolin was passive aggressively ripping on Trump with known lies.

Fuck Fox News, pieces of shit. They are actively trying to bring Trump down.

0
Penuruloki 0 points ago +3 / -3

If the EC fails to produce a winner (which requires a majority, not just a plurality; they just need to keep Trump Electors from casting their ballots), then the House chooses the President, and the Senate the VP, with each state having a single vote (chosen by majority of the delegation). Amendment 20 allows them to pass law to deal with a candidate death however they see fit (so sacrificing Biden lets them play fast and loose with who they vote for), but both options require them to play games in the Senate. If they can't rig the senate vote, Pence becomes VP and fills in for a missing President, or becomes VP for whoever the House picks (and how long will Biden last?).

They have two obvious plays at this point; 1) the house vote is from the top 3 EC finalists. So expect some Dem Electors to cast a Harris vote for Pres to make her 3rd place so the House can pick her over Biden, to keep Pence from inheriting the office from Biden. 2) Make sure Biden doesn't survive to the vote, so they can easily bump Harris up (either by express legal act, or relying on earlier Constitutional language).

21
Mrsattorney 21 points ago +21 / -0

😄😄😄😄

45
Pukeahontas 45 points ago +45 / -0

Hillary has been rattling on twitter lately. Disgusting swamp creature, who just wants power. Filthy cunt stayed with Billy even after he cheated on her, because she wanted to be close to the power corridor. Its incredible how libtard freaks still vote and respect her.

BTW Pelosi is wrong, if it comes to contingent elections, like the article points out Republicans have more states thereby win the contingent elections.

Pelosi's resting bitch face wont have any option but to confirm Trump's election as speaker of the House, in case of a contingent election.

As stupid and miserable as she is, I am sure her advisors have advised her what exactly a contingent election is and she would be hoping it never comes down to that

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
9
0io- 9 points ago +9 / -0

Well, it was "her turn" to be President, after all. And President Obama said "Trump will never be President". Really that election stuff where the peasants and little people pretend to go out and vote is just a formality when the polls show you're going to win for sure. That's why she didn't have to campaign and could just spend all that time alone with Huma drinking instead...

Who would have thought that the "basket of deplorables" was so big? lol

6
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 6 points ago +6 / -0

By murdering her enemies.

4
Kaiheitai 4 points ago +4 / -0

Clintons have been CIA bitches since Bill let them use Mena as their national cocaine trafficking hub.

-2
Frogleg2 -2 points ago +6 / -8

Sorry but at this point it is Trumps fault she and the others aren't in jail

I have no idea why he hasn't fullfilled his obligation as chief law enforcement officer and head of DOJ and FBI and all under the executive branch and demanded they go for indictments back in 2017 or 2018 when there was plenty to get an indictment with but he hasn't.

Lock her up wasnt a fun chant. We meant it. it was an important campaign promise. I have NO EARTHLY IDEA WHY HE HASN'T DONE ANYTHING! he keeps blaming his AG and others bit HE CAN CALL THEM IN ANY DAY AND SAY DO THIS OR YOU ARE FIRED AND KEEP GOING UNTIL HE FINDS SOMEONE WHO WILL BRING THE DAMN GRAND JURY.

So don't talk about Hillary.

Sorry I am a huge Trump supporter but TRUMP REALLY FUCKED UP BY NOT PUTTING THESE DANGEROUS TRAITORS IN JAIL.

5
Pukeahontas 5 points ago +6 / -1

Trump cant really move unless he has a water tight case on his table. Should he send the FBI and DOJ to investigate the swamp they will suppress all the evidence against the enemies, they will leak to the enemies whats going on. Clintons crimes are indictable only if there are witnesses who speak about it, who never flinch for even a moment.

Even the GOP will stop having his back. Most of the GOP is oldies who grew up alongside the clintons and have earned along side them. The new ones like Gaetz, Cruz, Jordan are few and far.

Draining the swamp starts with judicial appointments, and filth has to be cleaned up. Trump appointed over 400 judges to federal and circuit courts. 4 years is just too short a time to do everything.

-5
Frogleg2 -5 points ago +4 / -9

I have heard this for four years.

Sorry.

I don't believe it.

He coukdbhave stood at the door of the fbi and asked every person leaving if they are loyal and what they are working on and fired any one of them until he was only left with good honest ones.

And he should have.

We all expected some version of that.

He has the power to fire anyone in the federal workforce.

He should have purged.

HE CHOSE AND STILL CHOOSES NOT TO PURGE.

8
Guruchild 8 points ago +8 / -0

He’s got an election to win, you wound up fly. Calm the fuck down.

4
Pukeahontas 4 points ago +4 / -0

Trump fired Comey (who solely opens his mouth to lie) and the shitshow just started post that. Russia hoax, special counsel investigations, impeachments and we are here.

He coukdbhave stood at the door of the fbi and asked every person leaving if they are loyal and what they are working on and fired any one of them until he was only left with good honest ones.

They wouldnt have lied? Lying is in their DNA, just like Comey lies all the time.

We all hate these swamp creatures, it but no one hates them more than Trump - because he is the one they are all after, we are just pawns. He faces the hate, the slander, the abuse. Its just impossible doing everything in 4 years.

17
AlphaNathan 17 points ago +17 / -0

The deep state has the WORST women, don't they folks?!?

14
BSnatch 14 points ago +14 / -0

People should vote for trump based on this alone...just look at their "women"!

12
Formerlurker92 12 points ago +12 / -0

And the prettiest women they have for the job

10
BilbroNaggins 10 points ago +10 / -0

Don't forget pretty Nellie ohr.

5
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 5 points ago +5 / -0

Gross. My boner just became a belly button.

35
UpTrump 35 points ago +35 / -0

The supreme court will get to decide on fraud before it's officially contested in January. House won't get a say

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
6
lurkwellmyfriends 6 points ago +6 / -0

Which is what needs to happen for this shit to get cleaned up with as little violence as possible. But, we're ready - either way.

I'm willing to go out and risk it. They say they are, but they're always protected by their local corrupt Dems issuing stand-downs for rioters but arrests for defenders.

Not sure if the blue line will still follow those dictates come January. If the other side wants to gamble on that then let's go.

Once again, your terms are acceptable.

2
FormerGraveheart 2 points ago +2 / -0

If mail-in ballots are discarded, we're saved and it's miracle.

2
Side-o-Beef_Curtains 2 points ago +2 / -0

STOP! I can only get so erect!

19
dontUseVinegerAsLube 19 points ago +19 / -0

her asshole must get jealous because of all the shit that comes out of her mouth

5
PB_Mack 5 points ago +5 / -0

could have gone all day without actually thinking about her asshole.

5
Long_time_lurker 5 points ago +5 / -0

Pelosi talking out her ass again.

How can you tell which is which? She looks like she has two assholes and no mouth.

113
RlzJohnnyM 113 points ago +115 / -2

This fucking witch thinks she is going to hold the house

Retarded

58
UpTrump 58 points ago +72 / -14

Unfortunately they are likely to. More republicans up for re-election, and nobody seems to give a shit about fraud in the house races

53
Art-Vandelay41 53 points ago +53 / -0

I give a shit. I give a massive shit.

37
UpTrump 37 points ago +37 / -0

Nobody *in power* gives a shit

18
Nyy817 18 points ago +18 / -0

Nadler does

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
slashp 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cool it Nadler

35
muy_libre 35 points ago +36 / -1

It doesn't matter. If there's an electoral college tie, it's decided in the house, but not by simple majority. Each state delegation gets 1 vote. Meaning, all of the representatives from California get 1 collective vote, all of the representatives from Wyoming get 1 collective vote, etc. 50 total votes. Most states are Republican.

If it goes to the house, Trump wins.

21
The_1776 21 points ago +21 / -0

Good explanation. I believe as it stands now the Rs represent 26 states.

Vote down ballot folks!

8
UpTrump 8 points ago +8 / -0

How is it that Trump won far more than 26 states in 2016 yet we only have majorities in 26-27?

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
rando_calrissian 4 points ago +4 / -0

Because when they wrote that into the constitution they weren't expecting massive vote fraud.

1
analog_shitposter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good point, chicken or the egg scenario

5
PB_Mack 5 points ago +5 / -0

Midterm bullshit and ballot harvesting. I bet a few more flip back to the R column this time. Minnesota for sure. People are still pissed there.

2
CaucasianCurmudgeon 2 points ago +2 / -0

The 26 states have a majority of Rs in their delegations in the House.

9
meriwetherlewis 9 points ago +9 / -0

Which is why Dems are working very hard to flip a few House races in states where the Republican majority of House members is slim.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
-1
muy_libre -1 points ago +1 / -2

Won't work.

2
Slapstick86 2 points ago +2 / -0

What about Dems stealing house and Senate seats????????

20
bosnianhero 20 points ago +20 / -0

What do you mean by more republicans up for re-election? House is cleared out every 2 years.

7
UpTrump 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yeah you're right. I was thinking of the Senate

1
ChokingOnARedpill 1 point ago +2 / -1

....and rightfully so.

11
CannonballJunior 11 points ago +11 / -0

No, there are more Dims up for reelection in the House:

232 Dims

198 Pubs

 1 Lib
 4 Vacant

Pubs need a net gain of 20 seats to be assured of control. The new House session would begin on 1/3/21.

9
Hugh 9 points ago +9 / -0

Isn't every house member up for election every two years? If so, more dems would be up for re-election in the House.

10
JigglesV 10 points ago +10 / -0

They are rigging it for her, it is naive to think otherwise

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
91
deleted 91 points ago +94 / -3
30
TexasPiper 30 points ago +32 / -2

Sometimes I say to myself we should show them what fascism REALLY looks like. You know, for the good of the country.

20
ChrisSuperDude 20 points ago +20 / -0

You're not alone, I've had the same thought. They want to call a democratically elected president 'fascist', they call individuals owning guns 'fascist' they call white people marrying other white people 'fascist'. I'm a fascist, you're a fascist, he/she/we are fascists. I've started thinking that the left should see real fascism for a little while just to see how good they had it under 'fascist' Trump.

16
muy_libre 16 points ago +17 / -1

Count me in, boys!

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
4
knightofday 4 points ago +4 / -0

Very similar scenario for sure

1
Scroon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look at Singapore. Fascism pulled it out of third world jungle gook status and turned it into one of Asia's major economic centers. Interestingly, they were also fighting communist and racial insurrections at their start.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
christianknight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Chile is commie again.

6
deleted 6 points ago +8 / -2
2
tufftoffee 2 points ago +2 / -0

If only Trump was as much of a fascist dictator as they make him out to be, then this bullshit wouldnt be happening

14
stratocaster_patriot 14 points ago +15 / -1

I would too and I would use Omar as an easy excuse. Since I know for a fact that there is incompetence, corruption, and 3rd world style voter fraud in the House with documented evidence then I would be willing to overthrow the House with force. This House cannot be allowed to decide anything unilaterally.

11
MuadDon 11 points ago +11 / -0

Assuming the military listens. That's a big if people here don't wanna consider.

6
PB_Mack 6 points ago +7 / -1

Fuck 'em. We outgun them 40 to 1 and most their warfighters are conservative. I'd love their support mind you, but really..if they stick with the blue states they'd be to busy putting down riots after the red-staters shut off their water, food, and power.

5
MuadDon 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah but if the military is not on our side, then those farms, water treatment and power plants will have military teams at them almost immediately before that happens. If there's some commie takeover they will not be abandoning critical infrastructure.

7
LawfulSilentMajority 7 points ago +7 / -0

Just going by what Cruz said, but the house vote is one per state so republicans still have the advantage. They would have to refuse to let the process happen and go to deadlock until inauguration day. Then Pelosi is interim president

6
tonightm16 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'll support Trump keeping power through military force

Sadly military leaders are likely to side with the far left. Doesn't matter what the rank and file are like. Most of the officer class are socialists.

6
0v3rKill 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's because officers are university educated where they become indoctrinated with Marxist ideology. Fucking sad.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
66
IAmTheSenate 66 points ago +66 / -0

This is why down-ballot matters. This is why if an (R) "loses" to a (D) by a couple hundred votes and there's evidence of fuckery going on, we NEED TO PRESS on those cases just as hard as the DJT v. Sleepy election

21
putin 21 points ago +21 / -0

A couple hundred? They are harvesting by thousands.

7
hansgruber7 7 points ago +7 / -0

millions

14
CannonballJunior 14 points ago +14 / -0

It's also why you have to hold your nose and vote for a stinking rino in November (if that is what's running in your district). Especially this year!

The time to expunge rino's is during the primaries.

3
Slapstick86 3 points ago +3 / -0

Idk what you mean by press, we need to fully not accept the results. Like full riots targeting the capitol.

43
deleted 43 points ago +44 / -1
34
ModelMinority 34 points ago +35 / -1

There's only dust and pus at the end of her tunnel.

26
deleted 26 points ago +26 / -0
25
Vivadiscordia 25 points ago +25 / -0

Try it and see what happens. If we can no longer rely on the electoral processes, then the republic is dead.

3
tufftoffee 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly. Arm yourselves.

20
sleazysaxsolo 20 points ago +20 / -0

Die, bitch. Wait is that too harsh?

11
MyUsername 11 points ago +11 / -0

Not harsh enough.

6
ClownTamer 6 points ago +6 / -0

Not harsh, just redundant. She’s been dead for centuries. They’ve been Weekend at Bernie’s-ing her around for years now.

17
Sea_Still 17 points ago +17 / -0

The dried up drunken whore and her pipe dreams

14
Shakakka99 14 points ago +14 / -0

WHO THE FUCK DOES THIS BITCH THINK SHE IS? I'm sick and tired of her threats, her bullshit, and her obstruction of the will of the American people. There needs to be laws put in place to combat this type of behavior. Something where the people can decide that a new speaker be voted in, if let's say 75% of America is unhappy with the current one.

3
tufftoffee 3 points ago +3 / -0

Any new laws are meaningless considering our lovely DOJ won't enforce current ones.

14
DeuteronomyTwentyone 14 points ago +14 / -0

Cam someone shut this old rot crotch up!! Nancy, you old stanky hag.....you will never be president! Trump is and will be president again so fuck off bitch!

2
stratocaster_patriot 2 points ago +4 / -2

Interesting username. That's a particularly draconian part of the Bible. Somewhat arbitrary too. Sure glad we don't live under ancient Jewish law anymore. I just noticed the name and found it interesting. But hey, I'm willing to go all Deuteronomy 21 on Nancy's ass and a lot of others as well.

4
DeuteronomyTwentyone 4 points ago +4 / -0

🤣 I must admit when I first selected my username I f'd up a little and should have used ':' I was really going for Deuteronomy 20:1 ---"When you go to war against your enemies and see horses and chariots and an army greater than yours, do not be afraid of them, because the Lord your God, who brought you up out of Egypt, will be with you".

These are definitely some trying times and balance needs to be restored.

1
stratocaster_patriot 1 point ago +2 / -1

Ah now that makes perfect sense. Chapter 20 is more about stoning people to death based on how close a dead body is to a village or some bullshit like that lol.

2
DeuteronomyTwentyone 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ahahaha, yea..sucks that I cant fix it now but oh well I guess. Makes a great conversation starter though 😁👍

2
Tradbrew 2 points ago +2 / -0

Psalm 119

14
EDDIT_IS_CUCKED 14 points ago +14 / -0

If Pelosi tries anything, she better have a spot reserved next to RBG in hell.

2
tufftoffee 2 points ago +2 / -0

We'll find out shortly. It's October after all.

13
LordNoz 13 points ago +13 / -0

Each state gets one representative from house of represent'n and they each vote. Whoever has the most wins. Amendment 12, yo.

4
DerAlterAmAltar 4 points ago +4 / -0

I was talking to someone recently and they pointed out that despite not having a republican majority in the house, when it's actually broken down by state the way it would be republicans actually would have the majority.

1
N900mixalot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes it's by delegation and the breakdown is not what she thinks it is.

13
napoleon4321 13 points ago +13 / -0

A double negative? For shame, you rancid drunk.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
12
Pilotaaron1 12 points ago +12 / -0

The fact that she feels it could be a tie makes me feel better. Polls can be discouraging. Part of the reason I love thedonald. And not that any of it would stop me from voting Trump.

10
Oback_Barama 10 points ago +10 / -0

She doesn't think it will be a tie. The dems are going hard on the mail in fraud angle, and the count the votes after the election.

They are going to try some electoral collage shit, like getting MI, WI, PA, or other states to fail to send electors due to "we still haven't counted EVERY vote!"

If they can get enough states to do this, then it is possible that GEOTUS doesn't have the required 270 Electoral Votes to win the election, and it goes to the house.

4
Vivadiscordia 4 points ago +4 / -0

If the states fail to send electors, then the people will send their own.

1
tufftoffee 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bachelors.

4
lefty295 4 points ago +4 / -0

You gotta imagine their internal polling is nowhere near the external ones. Think about how much Biden has pivoted on since just the debate.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
11
remember1776 11 points ago +11 / -0

Trump is the motherfucking train in the tunnel

8
Ieggo 8 points ago +8 / -0

Help me out but I think the election won't be decided in the house but in the senate if it comes to that.

12
STEVE_HUFFMANS_BULL 12 points ago +12 / -0

It’s decided in the House, but like other commenters said it’s one vote per state. So the one rep from Wyoming has one vote and the 53 reps from California also have one vote total. Republicans have a majority in 26 states currently, leading to Trump victory

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
UpTrump 5 points ago +5 / -0

Which is why they are trying to cheat every single downballot election in every single state

2
Modus_Pwninz 2 points ago +2 / -0

"REEEEEEEEEEEEE TRUMP ALWAYS WINS!"

Yes.

1
Ieggo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are we talking about the electors? As far as I know the president of the senate in this case Vice President Pence does the tally of the state electors and decides which to accept and the house has no constitutional authority to do anyting about it.

1
STEVE_HUFFMANS_BULL 1 point ago +1 / -0

Amendment XII:

... The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. ...

Pence and the Senate count the votes, but the House picks the new president if the Electors don’t give a majority to someone

8
Zadok 8 points ago +8 / -0

Any chance we can impeach Pelosi at the same time?

2
stratocaster_patriot 2 points ago +3 / -1

No because they own the house and dissent is not allowed so not one Dem would vote to impeach. Not one even if they thought it was the right thing to do.

2
Zadok 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sad.

8
Doubld 8 points ago +8 / -0

Need to make Nancy the first speaker to lose the house twice.

8
sustainable_saltmine 8 points ago +8 / -0

Civil War it is then, Nancy. You will not become "Acting President" and Joe/Kamala will not be sworn in. Trump or nothing.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
stratocaster_patriot 7 points ago +8 / -1

That sounds to me like an admission that election will be tampered with and it amounts to a political threat. She bitches about the end of democracy and right here proves that she does not support one nor the House. Needs removal and jail time.

Also, couldn't we just copy them and say, "The people need to decide which is why the House won't vote on this until after the next round of House elections."

7
Jcholl9 7 points ago +8 / -1

The election should be decided in House? Geee, I wonder how that's going to turn out?

Do the democrats really want a Civil War?

2
sharthappens 2 points ago +2 / -0

*another Civil War

2
TrumpAlwaysKeks2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well that’s what the Constitution says. Are you against the Constitution?

2
Jcholl9 2 points ago +2 / -0

What I'm against is abusing the Constitution to take down a legit President...

But the Constitution if not mistaken dose give we people the right to act if every necessary... Right now we are trying to take this country back through the elections but if that don't work we might have to seek other options?

We will see what happens...

1
lefty295 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most likely Trump wins if it's decided in the House. It's not a normal house vote, every state only gets one vote regardless of the number of reps they have.

1
Jcholl9 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well it should be interesting to see how things turn out then....

I wonder how many democrats will CRY Russia, Russia, Russia?

6
CannonballJunior 6 points ago +6 / -0

And this is why Pedes and Pubs in states like California, Illinois, New York, New Jersey, etc MUST vote in their state elections and not stay at home just b/c they think there's not much chance for Trump to win their state.

I think plenty of dispirited pubs not voting in those states makes the dim majorities in those states bigger than they otherwise would have been.

4
fartglove 4 points ago +4 / -0

Absolutely - go out and vote for what you can. Trump is not likely to win Illinois but I am going out in person if only to show this neighborhood that someone here supports trump. I bet most will mail it in. I will wear that stupid mask and stand in line as long as I need to.

6
WheeeeeThePeople 6 points ago +6 / -0

Turnout is key. Drive a neighbor to the polls. Donate what you can.

6
DemsFuckKids 6 points ago +6 / -0

seems fair

6
nickybops 6 points ago +6 / -0

Shes just selling false hope to her base.

6
Shadilady 6 points ago +6 / -0

Kevin Mccarthy did a great job today of calling bullshit at about the 15:00 mark. Great update on her shitty behavior all around.

https://youtu.be/KGFblpsDNMw

6
5121313 6 points ago +6 / -0

She probably got this drivel from her Old Pal - Leftist Communist Prof Laurence Tribe. You know for a fact She, Shifty Shitty Adam Schiff and Fat Nadler together couldn't come up with how to even spell "Contingent".

https://www.westernjournal.com/leftist-harvard-prof-pushes-scenario-pelosi-become-president/

5
jollybygolly 5 points ago +5 / -0

Pelosi is such a hard-core drunk that if she ever tried to stop she would die.

Her every utterance is a drunk-post.

5
Trundel 5 points ago +5 / -0

This bitch promised to retire in 2020 as a compromise for the radicals voting for her as speaker. Why the fuck is no one talking about that.

5
Scumbag-reddit 5 points ago +5 / -0

Trump needs 80 million votes on election day to ensure no stealsies

1
sustainable_saltmine 1 point ago +1 / -0

i don't see 80 million happening for either side

1
Scumbag-reddit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Taking Trump's numbers from last election, and factoring in the enormous hispanic and black approval jump he's gotten, 80 mil is definitely possible.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
sustainable_saltmine 5 points ago +5 / -0

the more rhetoric comes out like this, the more I worry about some kind of shenanigans that will definitely happen to ram Joe in as "winner" and steal.

On election night, they immediately declare/project Joe Biden "winner". What that does is set the precedent that if Trump contests, then "he's just being a sore loser". Try to invalidate and delegitimize anything Trump does to contest the results. Try to get the Joe, Kamala, and "Blue no matter who" fanboys and "Never Trumpers" to go off online, wherever mocking Trump, his supporters and everyone as sore losers, allege we are spinning up militias ready to riot in the streets because we're upset Trump lost and now we're just gonna go "burning the country down so the Dems can't have it".

Meanwhile Trump's people challenge and fight, it intentionally doesn't get resolved because the Dems have to be party to all the proceedings and will act just like they are acting right now on Coronavirus aide. Stalemate, no resolution, so it goes to SCOTUS, if ACB isn't there in time or somehow enough of the other judges cuck out, we either lose and it's over or say, someone abstains, then it isn't a majority decision and it goes to the CURRENT House, not the one that would be on Jan 3rd when the new session of Congress opens, Nancy is still Speaker despite perhaps her party loses majority and it goes back to our control. She intentionally holds up her decision until Jan 20th, makes HER "Acting President" and then we're totally fucked.

Vote By Mail is the root cause of all of this. By states allowing ballots to be counted up to 6 days after election day, it gives the Democrats all the time they need to keep an eye on the count, and see how much they are "behind", then they can manufacture or "produce" enough to put them over the top that conveniently haven't been counted yet. Someone had a few boxes in their car that they were transporting to the counting house and "neglected to remember to bring them in".

Frankly, since a bunch of states have already blast-mailed out unsolicited ballots and aren't letting you vote in person not much we can do about it. If they try to mandate in person voting where it's been banned, the Governors will cry that it's too soon, vote has already begun with the "early voting" and of course the "coronavirus concerns"

5
FlusteredPeach2 5 points ago +5 / -0

I have to put a beloved pet down. It’s a shame the good ones have to go and Pelosi goes on.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
westrock2000 4 points ago +4 / -0

Is she up for re-election this year? Gonna laugh my ass off if she gets ousted. (I see ads on YouTube for her challengers)

4
Mark-McAwesome 4 points ago +4 / -0

Too many people are currently allowed to spout off utter bullshit without the fear of being punched in the mouth.

4
apathy_meh 4 points ago +4 / -0

The newly elected Congress would get to vote not any lame ducks. The vote is by state so California gets 1 vote. It would not be ideal but it would most likely end with President Trump being re-elected.

4
DicerningSword 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well this is the Hill...

4
iIndianaJones 4 points ago +4 / -0

HAHA!

4
Postal 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, it's going to be a rude awakening when we break 400 electoral votes this year.

4
KekistanPM 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sounds like the Dems are working on their backup plan for if Trump wins even after the mail-ins are counted.

4
GeneralVeers 4 points ago +4 / -0

The way I understand it, each state in the House gets ONE vote, and the Republicans control more states.

As usual, Pelosi is blowharding.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
tonightm16 4 points ago +4 / -0

Its what they are planning for. The aim is not to cheat through making Biden win it's just to fuck up enough counts so it goes to the house. They will move very quickly on it giving it no time to go to SCOTUS.

They will then forcibly remove Trump from the WH install either Heels Up or Biden (if he still standing). Then move to pass a series of socialist laws. Put out an "enemy of the state" list. Calling for the FBI to arrest key figures that have support, Trump. Both in DC and on social media. Disband the SCOTUS and cancel and reverse any and all EO.

America will be a socialist state after that point.

Don't count on the armed forces or the police to come to the defense of the people. Police have been carrying out anti-freedom COVID laws since March and key military leaders will not support the people or Trump.

3
RahkeemTheMachine 3 points ago +3 / -0

Who would win? 500 elderly politicians or 10 million able bodied patriots?

3
spez_this 3 points ago +3 / -0

From WIKI: "In the event of a future Electoral College deadlock regarding either the presidential election or the vice presidential election, it will be the incoming Congress holding a contingent election."

So, if we can flip enough House seats we can get a double whammy: Take Pelosi's gavel away AND have the House hand it to Trump. To me, this would be the BEST outcome.