2194
Comments (103)
sorted by:
102
deleted 102 points ago +102 / -0
68
Rainman 68 points ago +68 / -0

TRUMP MUST HAVE A DIFFERENT STRATEGY

What if each time the moderator asks one of those "gotcha questions" Trump goes with the KM murder strategy and says...

THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION STEVE, LET'S ASK JOE... JOE WHY DID YOU EULOGIZE A KNOWN KKK MEMBER AND PARTNER WITH KNOWN RACISTS DURING YOUR 47 YEARS IN PUBLIC OFFICE?

Seems that would be pretty easy to prepare for considering the questions will essentially be liberal talking points

24
IncredibleMrE1 24 points ago +24 / -0

"C'mon man!"

13
Bigly-Wrong 13 points ago +13 / -0

I thought you liked me.

11
1A_FTW 11 points ago +11 / -0

That would be epic!

2
cpt_majestic2 2 points ago +2 / -0

James Woods

6
Luckycoz 6 points ago +6 / -0

This will be a town hall format, so I hope he’s got a different strategy.

4
james43552352345 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Joe why are you always touching children like that?"

rolls out a huge sheet of incriminating photos

4
2016TrumpMAGA 4 points ago +4 / -0

The candidates are provided with the subjects of the questions a week in advance. This has never happened before - except when Donna Brazile slipped Killary the questions.

2
Hangmhigh 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm mean how can you expect a person to explain their beliefs off the cuff? Comon' Man!

20
TearofLys 20 points ago +20 / -0

Not a single neutral moderator. This is some bullshit.

8
Reallytiredofthem 8 points ago +8 / -0

Can we have Tucker as a moderator?

3
remember1776 3 points ago +3 / -0

understatement

68
kag_patriot 68 points ago +68 / -0

This whole election sham has gotten beyond ridiculous.

22
deleted 22 points ago +22 / -0
21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
13
Bluestorm83 13 points ago +13 / -0

Oh no. No, one month and they start perma-rioting. Be ready.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
genghiskern 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then 2024's election cycle can begin. Yay!

47
RawJa777 47 points ago +47 / -0

WHY THE FUCK DO WE PUT UP WITH THIS SHIT???

45
Mythologick 45 points ago +45 / -0

Also worked as an intern in Joe Bidens fucking office.

"Before coming to C-SPAN, Steve covered business, politics and local government as a reporter and anchor at WHEC-TV (NBC Affiliate) in Rochester, N.Y. Prior to that, he was an anchor and reporter at WSEE-TV in Erie, PA and WHBF-TV (CBS Affiliates) in Rock Island, Illinois. Steve taught several courses on the media & politics at St. John Fisher College & Nazareth College in Rochester, NY between 1988-90. While attending college, he served as an intern in the office of Delaware Sen. Joseph R. Biden, and later a staff assistant in Sen. Edward M. Kennedy’s communication office."

https://smpa.gwu.edu/steve-scully

Can't make this fucking shit up.

28
Block_Helen 28 points ago +28 / -0

Trump should ABSOLUTELY call him out on this. In the first five minutes.

"So, Mr. Scully, before I get started here, I just wanted to let the audience know that you once served as an intern in Joe's Senate office. I thought that was something they might like to know about you. But proceed, I'm sure you won't be giving Joe any help."

10
N7fury 10 points ago +10 / -0

That would be perfect.

8
Block_Helen 8 points ago +8 / -0

Actually now that I think of it, I would have him leave off the last line. Just be understated. It'll be the first thing out of Trump's mouth so everyone will be paying very close attention.

"So, Mr. Scully, before I get started here, I just wanted to let the audience know that you once served as an intern in Joe's Senate office. I thought that was something they might like to know about you."

And then, right on to his first point. Everyone's mouth will be open.

7
Mythologick 7 points ago +7 / -0

He also should have called out Chris for being a democrat in front of everyone but...for whatever reason he doesn’t.

9
Block_Helen 9 points ago +9 / -0

I don't think being a registered Democrat is as big a conflict of interest as having once worked for one of the candidates, though.

3
DrinkMoreWater 3 points ago +3 / -0

Perfect 👌

2
Block_Helen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Block_Helen 2 points ago +2 / -0

He won't. But that's good, because it allows Trump to surprise everyone and make it a story right before - or as - the debate happens.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Block_Helen 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's actually a retweet so it isn't Scully...but it is the NYT's token "conservative" David Brooks.

10
TennesseePride 10 points ago +10 / -0

If that isn't the definition of a conflict of interest, I don't know what is.

3
Covfefefefe19 3 points ago +3 / -0

Who was the dipshit in the Trump campaign that agreed this moderator was ok?

1
Block_Helen 1 point ago +1 / -0

They don't have a lot of choices. It's either "agree to this moderator" or "look like a pussy because you back out of the debate."

1
MassTexodous 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you think Biden shoved his fingers up his pussy, too?

29
Kckroosian 29 points ago +29 / -0

💩. Can’t someone be found who isn’t anti Trump?

19
Filo76 19 points ago +19 / -0

Plenty of people aren’t anti Trump. But if we got someone who was even mostly impartial the lefties would implode and accuse us of what they are doing.

13
kmillz 13 points ago +13 / -0

So do it anyway? Fuck it, get some hyper partisan right-winger to balance then since they'll bitch anyway. At this point it would only even the playing field anyway after that absolute disaster in the 1st debate.

7
Filo76 7 points ago +7 / -0

I’d be onboard for that but the debate commission wouldn’t allow it because they are deep state cucks.

8
kmillz 8 points ago +8 / -0

So make a new one.

5
AtariArtist 5 points ago +5 / -0

So thell them to fuck off like Trump did the Press Club.

We don't 'have' to do shit.

6
unsquishable 6 points ago +6 / -0

I genuinely saw people saying Wallace was hard on Biden. Not kidding.

7
ColoradoTrumper45 7 points ago +7 / -0

Reality is hard on Biden.

6
unsquishable 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yep. He and his party have enjoyed the support of MSM for so long that his supporters have a completely skewed notion of balanced reporting or moderating. The norm is attacking Trump to them, so even remaining neutral would be considered going hard on Biden.

1
Covfefefefe19 1 point ago +1 / -0

Get fucking Joe Rogan. Dude was going to vote Bernie, so they can’t say he’s a right winger. He’d be fair.

5
N7fury 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fox should have used Brit Hume. He has a long enough tenure of being critical of both sides. He has been critical of Trump especially early on, but he's really dropped that since the riots and the pandemic. I believe he's 100% on the Trump train now which is probably why they chose Wallace. Fox is basically lost now. They'll phase out the old guard. It will happen sooner than later especially if the election is stolen

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
13
Block_Helen 13 points ago +13 / -0

You know, I don't even worry about this stuff anymore.

Most people who support Trump understand that he's the underdog and that the media is heavily biased against him. This reinforces that narrative.

Undecideds/persuadables will tune in to see this choad's obvious bias and will say "hey, maybe Trump is right about the media being biased."

First Rule Of Trump: everything anti-Trump eventually becomes pro-Trump.

8
grassshrimp 8 points ago +8 / -0

Only President Trump could have been elected against these unified globalists who want to transform us into their version of a socialist Country in which they would (at least in their minds), rule over us.

Virtually the entire "ruling elite" is against him and us.

2
MrBlack 2 points ago +2 / -0

They want us like South Africa, morons are much easier to control, just look at any leftist, they all say and do the same exact shit, like retarded robots.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
findthewarmspot 6 points ago +6 / -0

It’s just laughable at this point.

4
Chiliad5 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why did Team Trump consent to this?

Anyone who can read questions can moderate a debate. Put Brock Lesnar in charge of the next one. At least he wouldn’t stand for any shit.

4
BidensHiding 4 points ago +6 / -2

He must not be allowed to moderate

11
IncredibleMrE1 11 points ago +11 / -0

Disagree. Allow him to moderate. GEOTUS just right off the top states that the "moderator" tweeted the above and interned for Biden himself. Highlight the fact that the debate is rigged, directly in front of the hundreds of millions of viewers. Massive sunlight on the corruption in the most brutal way possible.

7
ColdBrewCovfefe 7 points ago +7 / -0

He should retweet this the morning of

"See you tonight!"

2
AtariArtist 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ok - you have a point - not crazy about it because the President seemed on his heels half of the last one - but the format is different this time so we'll see.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
fjobb 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sounds like an interrogation rather than a debate to me, with this guy running it.

2
Paul_Revere 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is the main reason I'd like to see the "debate tradition" ended. If television debating ever served any useful purpose, it's now been turned into a get-Trump shooting match, to cast DJT in the worst possible light. There's little or no real "debating" going on.

2
Ironball 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump can deal with this POS with ease.

2
Formerlurker92 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fair and balanced moderation

2
johnbillaby 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump will dominate this cuckold even harder than he did Wallace. Only leftists will mind, everyone else knows they're all entirely full of shit.

2
JohnnyApplememe 2 points ago +2 / -0

You guys aren't victims. Neither is Trump. Think of this like a video game. In order to win, you have to beat bosses. You're watching a movie. You can't stump the Trump. You aren't victims. Keep crushing patriots!

1
antimatter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thats fine, let everyone see the lopsidedness. And I doubt Biden can handle another round of the quantity of stimulants they pumped him up with. So not only will it be clearly lopsided, but he'll be working hard to drag Biden's carcass across the finish line.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Jastra 1 point ago +1 / -0

What globalist organization decides who the moderators are for the debates?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
antimatter 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think Dan Bongino is right. At this point, Trump's base is solidified. So the whole point of the debate is to try and get Biden to shed supporters.

1
MagasaurusRex 1 point ago +1 / -0

All these debates are going to be GEOTUS vs WHITE DOG TURDS

1
Monkeybeardontcare 1 point ago +1 / -0

what i don't understand is how the left has capitalized on every org. why can't we have a normal debate with normal moderators that are not obviously biased? why? and who chose this guy??

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
RogueLeaderX 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why aren't there any Pro Trump moderators? There are clearly pro Biden ones!

1
Thathurtsmyfeelings1 1 point ago +1 / -0

So why did the campaign agree to it?

1
HCQaddict 1 point ago +1 / -0

How come everyone looks like a pedo?

1
Smurfection 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm sick of biased moderators moderating the debates. For once, can't we have a conservative moderate the debates and ask the question? That hasn't happened my entire life.

1
alienjesus 1 point ago +1 / -0

How is this not a conflict of interest? Trump should throw a fit about this!

1
Dgilles111 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mr. Trump, Vice president Biden - what is your plan to curb the extreme violence and looting weve seen all summer from the proud boys, a white nationalist group? Also mr. Trump - why do you hate blacks people so much?

1
TwoPlusTwoEqualsFour 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fuckin' HONK

1
AntsCamera 1 point ago +1 / -0

They don't even hide the election interference anymore.

1
stallone 1 point ago +1 / -0

Doe Trump have so little power he can't even pick a moderator?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
WhiteLivesMatter 1 point ago +1 / -0

PRESIDENT TRUMP MUST REFUSE THE DEBATE

1
Block_Helen 1 point ago +1 / -0

David "Crease in Obama's Pants" Brooks?

I'm surprised. He is super milquetoast. This is going to be epic.

Edit: Never mind, I saw the face not the name. They look alike. Steve Literally Who Scully.

Edit 2: I see. Scully was retweeting Brooks, so the photo IS Brooks. Now I don't feel so crazy.

1
AtariArtist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Scott Adams is a dipshit. He was saying today that the debates are for the bases.

Horsefucking shit. It's a DNC gotcha game exclusively. If Trump needs to communicate and fire up his base - there's rallies nearly every day now (often more than one). The MSM can go screw - and that goes double for precious widdle Scott faggot Adams.

1
Nana4Trump45 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then we must demand a Trump supporter as a second moderator. Laura Ingraham would be great.

1
IntrepidBurger 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's the face of a pedo if I ever saw one.

1
Block_Helen 1 point ago +1 / -0

The face isn't Steve Scully, it's David Brooks at the NYT. Brooks is a cuck but I don't think he's a pedo.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Mavdick96 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who the fuck decides who these moderators are? Jesus Christ, not a single neutral mod.

1
bootyhole 1 point ago +1 / -0

yep, he's a bitch! i say we all demand a new moderator!

-1
OutcastSeal -1 points ago +1 / -2

No more debates. It's all rigged

2
spezisapedo 2 points ago +2 / -0

you sound like Bidens team

1
OutcastSeal 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well hopefully Biden has Covid now too

2
Block_Helen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nah, bro. Trump will win any contest he enters. He is always looking for a contest.