2394
Comments (202)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
25
Chick-fill-eh 25 points ago +27 / -2

Yes, she can support all of that, and (unlike Democrats) believe in rule of law.

No one here is voting for her. In fact, fuck her, But she is better than AoC etc.

7
Meddlesom 7 points ago +7 / -0

She doesn't believe in the rule of law. The constitution is the law, and she supports ripping it to shreds and rewriting it to strip us of all the rights mentioned in it.

1
Chick-fill-eh 1 point ago +3 / -2

Do you understand how that method is different than the current liberal method? Or do you think ignoring the law is the same exact thing as changing it?

2
Meddlesom 2 points ago +3 / -1

Do you understand that her method is a thousand times more dangerous?

1
Chick-fill-eh 1 point ago +3 / -2

No, it's not. If ignoring laws becomes accepted as it is, they can do anything they want. No need to be change laws if your whim is enforced.

4
LaPastillaEscarlata 4 points ago +6 / -2

Exactly, there is nuance to people.

2
anduriliamfotw 2 points ago +2 / -0

yep. the world would have to be very bad for me to vote for her, and at that point would probably be using guns instead.

1
Ballind 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's illegal to be a Communist