2394
Comments (202)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
7
Meddlesom 7 points ago +7 / -0

She doesn't believe in the rule of law. The constitution is the law, and she supports ripping it to shreds and rewriting it to strip us of all the rights mentioned in it.

1
Chick-fill-eh 1 point ago +3 / -2

Do you understand how that method is different than the current liberal method? Or do you think ignoring the law is the same exact thing as changing it?

2
Meddlesom 2 points ago +3 / -1

Do you understand that her method is a thousand times more dangerous?

1
Chick-fill-eh 1 point ago +3 / -2

No, it's not. If ignoring laws becomes accepted as it is, they can do anything they want. No need to be change laws if your whim is enforced.

1
Meddlesom 1 point ago +2 / -1

Big fucking wrong there, boy-o. We can fix laws being ignored by appointing judges that will do their job as judges, not activists. So far Trump has appointed 218 judges, 53 of which are appeals court judges, and that is already having an impact on the corrupt and high profile 9th circuit.

We can fix the constitution being ignored by putting constitutionalists in the supreme court, and we're going to have our third of those soon and the supreme court will have a conservative, constitutional majority.

...but when the constitution is amended, we've got zero fucking chance in fixing it. ZERO CHANCE. In the history of the United States only ONE amendment has been repealed, prohibition.