I'll just keep holding on to the book that I've got that hasn't changed, and still holds true.
How exactly do you know the bible still holds true?
It seems to have gotten quite a few things wrong.
Notably, the earth is a lot older than 6000 years, and it was created in more than 7 days.
its almost like, the bible is a human creation.
In fact, this is proved by the gospels.
If the transliteration was true and the bible was literally the word of god directly, we wouldn't need 4 different versions from which to draw our own conclusions. There would be one unambiguous version.
And furthermore, you probably aren't reading it in original church latin. You would be shocked how much can change during translation.
For example, Yeshua would be more accurately translated from the original as Joshua rather than Jesus if we go straight from the original source to modern english. What else might have changed its meaning in subtle yet deeply reaching ways since christ walked the earth?
You have a very deep ignorance of the history of the bible and it’s translations.
there literally isn't enough information in this thread for you to make that determination, you are just being a judgemental asshole.
Even more, being written in greek before being translated into latin strengthens my point.
Even the most widely spread "original" that came with the catholic church, and which all protestant English Bibles are based on, was a human translation with all the human errors associated with that.
How exactly do you know the bible still holds true?
It seems to have gotten quite a few things wrong.
Notably, the earth is a lot older than 6000 years, and it was created in more than 7 days.
its almost like, the bible is a human creation.
In fact, this is proved by the gospels.
If the transliteration was true and the bible was literally the word of god directly, we wouldn't need 4 different versions from which to draw our own conclusions. There would be one unambiguous version.
And furthermore, you probably aren't reading it in original church latin. You would be shocked how much can change during translation.
For example, Yeshua would be more accurately translated from the original as Joshua rather than Jesus if we go straight from the original source to modern english. What else might have changed its meaning in subtle yet deeply reaching ways since christ walked the earth?
The bible wasn’t written in Latin. It was written in Greek. You have a very deep ignorance of the history of the bible and it’s translations.
there literally isn't enough information in this thread for you to make that determination, you are just being a judgemental asshole.
Even more, being written in greek before being translated into latin strengthens my point.
Even the most widely spread "original" that came with the catholic church, and which all protestant English Bibles are based on, was a human translation with all the human errors associated with that.