You can prove 2+2=4 if and only if we agree certain first principles are true, these principles are called axioms and they cannot be proven or disproved.
Uraniuam 238 turns into lead through a chain of several decay products", I've never claimed this can't be tested and proven. Do you understand that?
Do you understand admitting that this can be tested an proven is admitted radiological dating works?
You've tested and proven it, great, now how does this tell you how old the earth is?
Because the ratio of uranium to lead will indicate exactly the age of that rock.
This is provable by the invariant nature of radioactive decay, and the chain of decay products from uranim to lead.
I linked a Wikipedia article on it, but if you want to get into the meat of it, Uranium 238 turns into lead thru a chain of several decay products.
This again, is something that can be empirically tested and proven. No faith required.
The rate at which radioactive decay occurs is known to be invariant.
You can also test this directly with many fast radioisotopes. No faith required.
It can't actually.
Math isn't science. It's something else entirely.
You can prove 2+2=4 if and only if we agree certain first principles are true, these principles are called axioms and they cannot be proven or disproved.
Do you understand admitting that this can be tested an proven is admitted radiological dating works?
Because the ratio of uranium to lead will indicate exactly the age of that rock.
This is provable by the invariant nature of radioactive decay, and the chain of decay products from uranim to lead.