4519 "Honey I shrunk the Joe Biden voting pool..." (media.patriots.win) posted 197 days ago by Son_of_a_Blue_Hen 197 days ago by Son_of_a_Blue_Hen +4519 / -0 351 comments share 351 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (351) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ -1 ▼ – deleted -1 points 197 days ago +1 / -2 ▲ 0 ▼ – PepisMaximus 0 points 197 days ago +1 / -1 I linked a Wikipedia article on it, but if you want to get into the meat of it, Uranium 238 turns into lead thru a chain of several decay products. This again, is something that can be empirically tested and proven. No faith required. The rate at which radioactive decay occurs is known to be invariant. You can also test this directly with many fast radioisotopes. No faith required. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 197 days ago +2 / -1 ▲ 0 ▼ – PepisMaximus 0 points 196 days ago +1 / -1 You don't seem to be understanding what faith is You don't seem to either. You've built a whole world view based on these theories. By proving them. No faith required. I didn't just read them in a book and accept them as wrote. Theories again, which change constantly The fact that you keep appealing to this as a negative is irrefutable proof you don't understand what science is. Most of the words you're using never even existed prior to this century. Bullshit? also, that doesn't have anything to do with the veracity of my statement This is a hopeless argument Yes, I agree you are hopelessly confused and incorrect. Science, unlike blind faith, admits when its wrong and changes. That's the entire point of the scientific method. permalink parent save report block reply
I linked a Wikipedia article on it, but if you want to get into the meat of it, Uranium 238 turns into lead thru a chain of several decay products.
This again, is something that can be empirically tested and proven. No faith required.
The rate at which radioactive decay occurs is known to be invariant.
You can also test this directly with many fast radioisotopes. No faith required.
You don't seem to either.
By proving them. No faith required.
I didn't just read them in a book and accept them as wrote.
The fact that you keep appealing to this as a negative is irrefutable proof you don't understand what science is.
Bullshit? also, that doesn't have anything to do with the veracity of my statement
Yes, I agree you are hopelessly confused and incorrect.
Science, unlike blind faith, admits when its wrong and changes.
That's the entire point of the scientific method.