4519 "Honey I shrunk the Joe Biden voting pool..." (media.patriots.win) posted 197 days ago by Son_of_a_Blue_Hen 197 days ago by Son_of_a_Blue_Hen +4519 / -0 351 comments share 351 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (351) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 0 ▼ – PepisMaximus 0 points 196 days ago +1 / -1 Of course it is nonsense to use the bible to refute OEC. Then you agree with me, pretty explicitly. purpose of my remarks was to point out how stupid you are when it comes to biblical history and theology Well proving me correct seems a rather poor way to go about that. and that you should recuse yourself from such discussions until you educate yourself. Why? Literally by your own admission, my point and the conclusions I drew from what I know is correct. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – anikom15 1 point 196 days ago +2 / -1 I had no problem with that point. I had a problem with these points: You stating that the bible was originally written in Latin. You stating that all English bibles come from a single source. You stating that the existence of four separate gospels indicates that they are not the Word of God. Various other minor fallacies and misconceptions. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 0 ▼ – PepisMaximus 0 points 195 days ago +1 / -1 You explicitly agreed that those "minor fallacies and misconceptions" are immaterial to the point I was making and that I was still right. So great job, You have managed to directly contradict Christ's teaching on judgement. You stating that the existence of four separate gospels indicates that they are not the Word of God. Yeah, they are the word of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. Who If you hadn't noticed, are humans. Literally the reason for having 4 different tellings of the same story is because human retelling of divine truths is imperfect. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – anikom15 1 point 195 days ago +2 / -1 Lol it doesn’t matter what your point is, or whether it’s wrong or right. You still said things that are wrong and I corrected them. I’m actually not surprised you don’t understand something as simple as peer review. Your capacity of self-awareness appears to be quite limited. As for the gospels, I heard you the first time. Reiterating a shitty argument doesn’t make it any better. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 0 ▼ – PepisMaximus 0 points 195 days ago +1 / -1 I’m actually not surprised you don’t understand something as simple as peer review. So have you just decided to be wrong now? I literally appealed to peer review as one of the main strengths of science. When was the last time the bible received an update due to peer review? 500 years ago? 1000? more? Reiterating a shitty argument doesn’t make it any better. You explicitly agreed on that point. Church made the bible, not god. Its a fallible human attempt to capture divine truth. Your capacity of self-awareness appears to be quite limited. For someone who is so invested in Christianity you are sure doing a great job of missing the point. Care to tell me where it says "Judge thy neighbor harshly for minor nitpicks even when the point they are making is right"? It doesn't say that anywhere in the bible? weird. Why are you acting like that then? permalink parent save report block reply
Then you agree with me, pretty explicitly.
Well proving me correct seems a rather poor way to go about that.
Why?
Literally by your own admission, my point and the conclusions I drew from what I know is correct.
I had no problem with that point. I had a problem with these points:
You stating that the bible was originally written in Latin.
You stating that all English bibles come from a single source.
You stating that the existence of four separate gospels indicates that they are not the Word of God.
Various other minor fallacies and misconceptions.
You explicitly agreed that those "minor fallacies and misconceptions" are immaterial to the point I was making and that I was still right.
So great job, You have managed to directly contradict Christ's teaching on judgement.
Yeah, they are the word of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
Who If you hadn't noticed, are humans.
Literally the reason for having 4 different tellings of the same story is because human retelling of divine truths is imperfect.
Lol it doesn’t matter what your point is, or whether it’s wrong or right. You still said things that are wrong and I corrected them.
I’m actually not surprised you don’t understand something as simple as peer review. Your capacity of self-awareness appears to be quite limited.
As for the gospels, I heard you the first time. Reiterating a shitty argument doesn’t make it any better.
So have you just decided to be wrong now?
I literally appealed to peer review as one of the main strengths of science.
When was the last time the bible received an update due to peer review? 500 years ago? 1000? more?
You explicitly agreed on that point.
Church made the bible, not god. Its a fallible human attempt to capture divine truth.
For someone who is so invested in Christianity you are sure doing a great job of missing the point.
Care to tell me where it says "Judge thy neighbor harshly for minor nitpicks even when the point they are making is right"?
It doesn't say that anywhere in the bible? weird.
Why are you acting like that then?