I'll just keep holding on to the book that I've got that hasn't changed, and still holds true.
How exactly do you know the bible still holds true?
It seems to have gotten quite a few things wrong.
Notably, the earth is a lot older than 6000 years, and it was created in more than 7 days.
its almost like, the bible is a human creation.
In fact, this is proved by the gospels.
If the transliteration was true and the bible was literally the word of god directly, we wouldn't need 4 different versions from which to draw our own conclusions. There would be one unambiguous version.
And furthermore, you probably aren't reading it in original church latin. You would be shocked how much can change during translation.
For example, Yeshua would be more accurately translated from the original as Joshua rather than Jesus if we go straight from the original source to modern english. What else might have changed its meaning in subtle yet deeply reaching ways since christ walked the earth?
You just don’t get it. I am, as a peer, reviewing you, and you’ve done an abysmal job. Congratulations.
I don’t particularly care who’s being judgemental about what. All I am focused on is pointing out your errors so that anyone reading this thread will be made aware of them. I don’t want misinformation to spread.
How exactly do you know the bible still holds true?
It seems to have gotten quite a few things wrong.
Notably, the earth is a lot older than 6000 years, and it was created in more than 7 days.
its almost like, the bible is a human creation.
In fact, this is proved by the gospels.
If the transliteration was true and the bible was literally the word of god directly, we wouldn't need 4 different versions from which to draw our own conclusions. There would be one unambiguous version.
And furthermore, you probably aren't reading it in original church latin. You would be shocked how much can change during translation.
For example, Yeshua would be more accurately translated from the original as Joshua rather than Jesus if we go straight from the original source to modern english. What else might have changed its meaning in subtle yet deeply reaching ways since christ walked the earth?
You just don’t get it. I am, as a peer, reviewing you, and you’ve done an abysmal job. Congratulations.
I don’t particularly care who’s being judgemental about what. All I am focused on is pointing out your errors so that anyone reading this thread will be made aware of them. I don’t want misinformation to spread.
That's a really strange conclusion to draw from explicitly agreeing that my point was correct.
Then why are you invested in the bible at all?
just as a curiosity?
Its a good thing you vindicated my point and proved me right then.