Look into Polonium Halos found in granite from all over the world. They point to granite hardening in an instant, not over an extended period of time.
Check out how the moon is slowly increasing the diameter of its orbit around us. Calculating back to the proposed age of the earth, there would be tidal waves occurring all over the planet due to calculated proximity of the moon.
Another thing to look at is the thickness of dust on the moon. NASA engineers calculated landing on millions of year’s worth of dust and only found what amounted to several thousands of years.
Where did all of earth’s limestone come from? It if came from natural processes, the oceans and atmosphere would have been poisoned many times over.
Tons of simple observations that don’t make sense if looking through the lens of natural processes and massive geological time.
Did you take a look at the book I listed in the comment above? Check it out.
I was of the same mindset years ago until someone presented me with how the Bible is actually very accurate and unerring.
Not going to argue, just encouraging you to dig, is all. Have a good one.
You are pointing to minor niggles, several of which have been specifically explained by science.
Including but not limited to, Astrophysics, Geology, and other earth Sciences.
Look into Polonium Halos found in granite from all over the world.
This is a gap.
If I debunk them, are you just going to run to the next gap and start claiming this wasn't evidence of god at all?
Because Polonium Halos exclusively form in igneous rock. Where you would expect to see rapid cooling from volcanic or meteoric events.
Check out how the moon is slowly increasing the diameter of its orbit around us.
This is a gap.
If I debunk this, are you just going to run to the next gap and claim this wasn't evidence of god at all?
If you understand how the moon was formed, you would know that 1, yes the oceans did used to be incredibly violent near the formation of the moon you would have had huge tides of molten rock all over the planet as the moon came from a massive collision with an object named Theia billions of years ago while the earth was molten.
NASA engineers calculated landing on millions of year’s worth of dust
This is yet another gap.
And NASA engineers calculated the dust on the moon from guesses its unsurprising that scientists were wrong, that's how hypotheses and the scientific method work. Learning from new data.
Where did all of earth’s limestone come from?
From natural processes in warm shallow seas for millions of years.
Why would the oceans and atmospheres be required to have been poisoned? That's just nonsense, in addition to being yet another gap.
You understand the earth didn't always have an oxygen nitrogen atmosphere that humans can breathe right? There are many points in its history where the air would have been poisonous to modern macrofauna
There are even anaerobic organisms that thrive in such conditions.
Tons of simple observations that don’t make sense if looking through the lens of natural processes and massive geological time.
You haven't listed a single one that doesn't require twisting or ignoring obvious scientific answers.
this is 100% a god of the gaps argument.
Are you really going to be happy with your god when those gaps close?
I was of the same mindset years ago until someone presented me with how the Bible is actually very accurate and unerring.
Yes, I have studied the bible.
No it is not very accurate and unerring.
You are making concessions in your reasoning to make it fit, rather than questioning the differences.
This is called Rationalization, or more specifically in Christianity Apologetics.
I outright reject such a weak and fragile god, if that's really what you want to believe...
I think it takes an amazing amount of arrogance to look at the provable scientific history of the universe and deny it rather than marvel in god's creation.
Appreciate the reply. Sounds like you are well versed in several disciplines.
I encourage you to check out the book - it presents a very comprehensive hypothesis that covers quite a few bases. It even presents information regarding the origin of earth’s radioactivity. Goes into ‘k-pinch’ (if I recall correctly) for that and digs into quite a few areas of study. Everything is listed with references so you can follow up on the concepts that are presented (if you wish to do so).
If things in the scientific community were on the level, I’d be with you, but things are curated even there. One of my EE professors was telling us that for both papers turned in for peer-review, and for funding requests, you have to toe a certain line or they will not be approved.
Yes it sounds like the same fake argument the anti-vaxxers make
"oh big pharma is trying to suppress us"
No, you are just experiencing pushback because its a dumb idea.
YEC is easily disprovable with no faith required.
An author "addressing" radio-isotope dating is insufficient, and is largely a god of the gaps argument.
Are you really satisfied with an almighty that has to hide in between the demonstrable explanations?
Why would you choose that when God just as easily could have created the very elements required for radiological dating?
Not GAP theory at all.
Look into Polonium Halos found in granite from all over the world. They point to granite hardening in an instant, not over an extended period of time.
Check out how the moon is slowly increasing the diameter of its orbit around us. Calculating back to the proposed age of the earth, there would be tidal waves occurring all over the planet due to calculated proximity of the moon.
Another thing to look at is the thickness of dust on the moon. NASA engineers calculated landing on millions of year’s worth of dust and only found what amounted to several thousands of years.
Where did all of earth’s limestone come from? It if came from natural processes, the oceans and atmosphere would have been poisoned many times over.
Tons of simple observations that don’t make sense if looking through the lens of natural processes and massive geological time.
Did you take a look at the book I listed in the comment above? Check it out.
I was of the same mindset years ago until someone presented me with how the Bible is actually very accurate and unerring.
Not going to argue, just encouraging you to dig, is all. Have a good one.
That sounds exactly like gap theory.
You are pointing to minor niggles, several of which have been specifically explained by science.
Including but not limited to, Astrophysics, Geology, and other earth Sciences.
This is a gap.
If I debunk them, are you just going to run to the next gap and start claiming this wasn't evidence of god at all?
Because Polonium Halos exclusively form in igneous rock. Where you would expect to see rapid cooling from volcanic or meteoric events.
This is a gap.
If I debunk this, are you just going to run to the next gap and claim this wasn't evidence of god at all?
If you understand how the moon was formed, you would know that 1, yes the oceans did used to be incredibly violent near the formation of the moon you would have had huge tides of molten rock all over the planet as the moon came from a massive collision with an object named Theia billions of years ago while the earth was molten.
This is yet another gap.
And NASA engineers calculated the dust on the moon from guesses its unsurprising that scientists were wrong, that's how hypotheses and the scientific method work. Learning from new data.
From natural processes in warm shallow seas for millions of years.
Why would the oceans and atmospheres be required to have been poisoned? That's just nonsense, in addition to being yet another gap.
You understand the earth didn't always have an oxygen nitrogen atmosphere that humans can breathe right? There are many points in its history where the air would have been poisonous to modern macrofauna
There are even anaerobic organisms that thrive in such conditions.
You haven't listed a single one that doesn't require twisting or ignoring obvious scientific answers.
this is 100% a god of the gaps argument.
Are you really going to be happy with your god when those gaps close?
Yes, I have studied the bible.
No it is not very accurate and unerring.
You are making concessions in your reasoning to make it fit, rather than questioning the differences.
This is called Rationalization, or more specifically in Christianity Apologetics.
I outright reject such a weak and fragile god, if that's really what you want to believe...
I think it takes an amazing amount of arrogance to look at the provable scientific history of the universe and deny it rather than marvel in god's creation.
Appreciate the reply. Sounds like you are well versed in several disciplines.
I encourage you to check out the book - it presents a very comprehensive hypothesis that covers quite a few bases. It even presents information regarding the origin of earth’s radioactivity. Goes into ‘k-pinch’ (if I recall correctly) for that and digs into quite a few areas of study. Everything is listed with references so you can follow up on the concepts that are presented (if you wish to do so).
If things in the scientific community were on the level, I’d be with you, but things are curated even there. One of my EE professors was telling us that for both papers turned in for peer-review, and for funding requests, you have to toe a certain line or they will not be approved.
Take care and good luck.
Why would I have any interest in pursuing debunked Young Earth Creationism?
You are aware that ideology had been totally dead for centuries until a group of scammers in the US started it up again right?
This is not a very good reason to abandon science and instead decide to believe crackpot theories and conspiracy fringe science.