Fictional books written by humans for the purposes of passing religious morals down through history.
You know what also isn't fact?
Unfalsifiable ideas like the omphalos.
Its amazing that you think seizing onto a pedantic distinction, that by your own explicit demonstration is completely trivial, some how gives you a petty victory here.
Are you aware how thoroughly ignorant you have demonstrated yourself to be in this thread?
You aren't are you? You don't even know how crazy the things you are arguing are.
Facts are facts. It’s not like there’s any context I missed that makes your ‘original church Latin’ remark any less stupid.
Yes, like the age of the universe. That's a fact.
You know what isnt a fact?
Fictional books written by humans for the purposes of passing religious morals down through history.
You know what also isn't fact?
Unfalsifiable ideas like the omphalos.
Its amazing that you think seizing onto a pedantic distinction, that by your own explicit demonstration is completely trivial, some how gives you a petty victory here.
Are you aware how thoroughly ignorant you have demonstrated yourself to be in this thread?
You aren't are you? You don't even know how crazy the things you are arguing are.
This is you, arguing that you have to disprove the omphalos in order to be able to rely on the observable fact that is the age of the universe.
and you still think you are in any kind of position to lecture people on "stupid".
I didn’t state any incorrect facts though.
Predicating an observable fact on an unfalsifiable one is an incorrect fact honey.
What fact is being predicated?