You don’t need to disprove the Omphalos or any unfalsifiable premise to talk about microwave background radiation or any other physical phenomena, and I never said so. Assuming X is false, implicitly or explicitly, does not mean X is disproven.
So the incorrect fact score remains 0-4. The one with the lowest score wins. Not sure if you’re going to make it....
I didn’t state any incorrect facts though.
Predicating an observable fact on an unfalsifiable one is an incorrect fact honey.
What fact is being predicated?
You understand I directly linked to your comment, with a highlighted exert and everything 3 messages ago.
Is your reading comprehension and memory that bad?
I mean, I’m not predicating anything.
You don’t need to disprove the Omphalos or any unfalsifiable premise to talk about microwave background radiation or any other physical phenomena, and I never said so. Assuming X is false, implicitly or explicitly, does not mean X is disproven.
So the incorrect fact score remains 0-4. The one with the lowest score wins. Not sure if you’re going to make it....