Honestly I don’t think they keep him around for the money. I think they keep him because if they can him the jig is up and us peasants will see Fox News for who they really are, And they can’t have us peasants noticing things like that can they now.
That’s true in part, but the whole cable TV consortium is tenuously held together by sports and a handful of characters like Tucker. When I wanted to cut cable the minute NASCAR bent the knee to BLM, my wife’s biggest concern was how she would watch Tucker. The man has an insanely loyal following.
I think you're exactly right. And I think these countless campaigns against Tucker and his advertisers are their doing. They are trying to create a situation where it would seem justifiable to get rid of him, so there wouldn't be massive backlash as well as red-pilling about FOX being a part of the unified media.
Greg Gutfeld is wonderful! His Saturday show had me laughing out loud two days before my heart surgery. We don't have cable, so we watch him now online.
Check him out; you won't regret it.
And he's cute, too.
They're not supportive of Trump though. I've explained the dynamic many times before, but it's basically this.
There is going to be a large amount of people who won't watch the unified media (CNN/NBC/ABC/MSNBC/CBS/etc.). So they use FOX news to capture that viewership. Now they get all the revenue that comes from that viewership, and they can slyly try to manipulate, and they can still pretty much control what these people see, even if they can't sell them the unified media message of orange man bad.
Of course, that doesn't mean all the anchors or people who work there are cucked. Tucker Carlson being the best example. Tucker does and says whatever he wants, and because of how beloved he is, and his massive ratings, they can't actually just get rid of him. There would be enormous backlash if they did.
Personally, and this is just conjecture on my part, but I think they have a hand in the campaigns against Tucker. I think the uniparty leadership wants him gone, and are trying to manufacture a situation where they can get rid of him because of some scandal or something, since he badly damages the mainstream narratives every night and tells the people the truth.
There's a candid video "Tucker Carlson Fly-Fishing in Central Park" from when he was new to Fox, his reaction starts like "oh shit the new channel didn't warn me about paparazzi" and then he's just a normal guy talking about fishing once he figures it's just some YouTuber who doesn't recognize him.
He may have a surgically incisive grip on rhetoric that few men do, but he's as down-to-earth as he presents himself (and losing the bowtie did him favors in that respect).
Many of them are pretty faces who read their lines. They are actors.
Everything on TV is fake. everything.
Take for example a random TV show. If you see a brand name thing there that brand usually paid for it to be there. If you see a generic brand item that means they put the generic one there for set dressing. They could have easily picked something normal people would have picked. They put generic brands because the brands will get upset if it does not 'fit their image'. Fake.
They all look pretty. Their skin is usually not shiny. Makeup and paint... Their hair is perfectly blown out and primped. Fake.
Or take a movie for example. Most movies only mic the actors for sound. Yet their is a huge amount of other noises. Folly work. Even the noises they make on TV and the movies are fake.
Sometimes one of the fake people will get popular. They get to control the fakeness.
Fake people do not like it when you see under the covers. It drives them insane. They spent years building up that 'look'. All for it to be revealed in 2 seconds what they really are. Fake.
They need to keep the sheep in the pen. If they went full globalist the boomers would migrate to an actual based source and learn truth. This is controlled opposition and the illusion of choice. A huge percentage of users on here still don't see that.
Roberts has been asking cucked shit for years, he just decided to drop his veil this time and look a prat. Wallace same story; it's unbearable to watch his bias masquerading as time-honored reporting. Dunno why people are still surprised by Fox's goons.
Fox has always been controlled opposition. GEOTUS scared them mostly into line when he destroyed Roger Ailes' princess Megyn Kelly. When Ailes died and Cuck Ryan and the Murdochs took over, the mask came off. The only reason Tucker is still there is that he's their cash cow.
Back in the day middle aged women would call his radio show and tell him how good looking he was, you could see his ego blossom. A few months ago Dr. Oz was on his show and said "old guys like us need to take precautions against COVID" Hannity got so insulted he started listing off all his extracurricular activities, karate, marathons. It really hit a nerve. Two weeks later Dr. Oz was back on and Hannity reminded him of the Dr. calling him an old guy. It really got to his ego.
Yeah, i watch all those all those briefings, i dont recall a single substantive question coming from him and nothing that is critical of the other side, of which there is plenty...Ima stick to independent creators and OANN.
I only watch videos of Tucker Carlson. He’s been able to call out Soros and getting away with it, contrary to what Gingrich experienced with Faulkner. For the sake of it Tucker should invite Newt again on his show as a big FU to Brazile, Murdoch Jr. and Ryan.
Actually, Harris Faulkner apologized to Fox viewers the next day about it & said she should have called it out right when it happened. She assured viewers that what happened to Gingrich was wrong & it wouldn't happen again on her show.
I was surprised he didn't, but not surprised super Trump supporter Laura Ingraham had him on the night of the debate and they both trashed Chris Wallace.
Anyone who didn't realize this after that faggot Paul Ryan joined the board is an idiot.
I have previously been suprised given these facts how supportive of Trump they have been.
Now, we know this was all too good to be true, and part of the plan.
The executives were holding off until closer to election.
Theyve now shown their cards, and they are traitors.
Proceed with caution.
And i do think there are still good people at Fox. Tucker is genuine, but only still exists because of how much money his is making for the brass.
Gutfeld and Lou Dobbs are based
Agreed. My favs, along with Jesse.
Dobbs was even based when he was on CNN
Honestly I don’t think they keep him around for the money. I think they keep him because if they can him the jig is up and us peasants will see Fox News for who they really are, And they can’t have us peasants noticing things like that can they now.
That’s true in part, but the whole cable TV consortium is tenuously held together by sports and a handful of characters like Tucker. When I wanted to cut cable the minute NASCAR bent the knee to BLM, my wife’s biggest concern was how she would watch Tucker. The man has an insanely loyal following.
I think you're exactly right. And I think these countless campaigns against Tucker and his advertisers are their doing. They are trying to create a situation where it would seem justifiable to get rid of him, so there wouldn't be massive backlash as well as red-pilling about FOX being a part of the unified media.
Greg Gutfeld is wonderful! His Saturday show had me laughing out loud two days before my heart surgery. We don't have cable, so we watch him now online. Check him out; you won't regret it. And he's cute, too.
They're not supportive of Trump though. I've explained the dynamic many times before, but it's basically this.
There is going to be a large amount of people who won't watch the unified media (CNN/NBC/ABC/MSNBC/CBS/etc.). So they use FOX news to capture that viewership. Now they get all the revenue that comes from that viewership, and they can slyly try to manipulate, and they can still pretty much control what these people see, even if they can't sell them the unified media message of orange man bad.
Of course, that doesn't mean all the anchors or people who work there are cucked. Tucker Carlson being the best example. Tucker does and says whatever he wants, and because of how beloved he is, and his massive ratings, they can't actually just get rid of him. There would be enormous backlash if they did.
Personally, and this is just conjecture on my part, but I think they have a hand in the campaigns against Tucker. I think the uniparty leadership wants him gone, and are trying to manufacture a situation where they can get rid of him because of some scandal or something, since he badly damages the mainstream narratives every night and tells the people the truth.
100%. Tucker must be squeaky clean or we would have heard about some past impropriety. When they can't refute the message, they attack the man.
There's a candid video "Tucker Carlson Fly-Fishing in Central Park" from when he was new to Fox, his reaction starts like "oh shit the new channel didn't warn me about paparazzi" and then he's just a normal guy talking about fishing once he figures it's just some YouTuber who doesn't recognize him.
He may have a surgically incisive grip on rhetoric that few men do, but he's as down-to-earth as he presents himself (and losing the bowtie did him favors in that respect).
They tried with some baseless sexual allegations that fizzled out faster than Hillary's firework show in 2016
Many of them are pretty faces who read their lines. They are actors.
Everything on TV is fake. everything.
Take for example a random TV show. If you see a brand name thing there that brand usually paid for it to be there. If you see a generic brand item that means they put the generic one there for set dressing. They could have easily picked something normal people would have picked. They put generic brands because the brands will get upset if it does not 'fit their image'. Fake.
They all look pretty. Their skin is usually not shiny. Makeup and paint... Their hair is perfectly blown out and primped. Fake.
Or take a movie for example. Most movies only mic the actors for sound. Yet their is a huge amount of other noises. Folly work. Even the noises they make on TV and the movies are fake.
Sometimes one of the fake people will get popular. They get to control the fakeness.
Fake people do not like it when you see under the covers. It drives them insane. They spent years building up that 'look'. All for it to be revealed in 2 seconds what they really are. Fake.
They've been controlled the whole time, but more openly since Ron Paul.
They need to keep the sheep in the pen. If they went full globalist the boomers would migrate to an actual based source and learn truth. This is controlled opposition and the illusion of choice. A huge percentage of users on here still don't see that.
Roberts has been asking cucked shit for years, he just decided to drop his veil this time and look a prat. Wallace same story; it's unbearable to watch his bias masquerading as time-honored reporting. Dunno why people are still surprised by Fox's goons.
Fox has always been controlled opposition. GEOTUS scared them mostly into line when he destroyed Roger Ailes' princess Megyn Kelly. When Ailes died and Cuck Ryan and the Murdochs took over, the mask came off. The only reason Tucker is still there is that he's their cash cow.
And Hannity is because he appeals to middle aged women
Back in the day middle aged women would call his radio show and tell him how good looking he was, you could see his ego blossom. A few months ago Dr. Oz was on his show and said "old guys like us need to take precautions against COVID" Hannity got so insulted he started listing off all his extracurricular activities, karate, marathons. It really hit a nerve. Two weeks later Dr. Oz was back on and Hannity reminded him of the Dr. calling him an old guy. It really got to his ego.
FOX was a cheerleader for the Iraq War because it benefited neoconservative interests. Does anyone in 2020 not understand who those interests were?
Judging by the downvotes, we have one of those globalists in here.
Honestly didn't even know Roberts was FOX until recently, I just assumed he was another lefty journalist.
Oh he is.
Hannity will not say anything bad about Chris Wallace's debate performance. I might add he's even defending him.
Yeah, i watch all those all those briefings, i dont recall a single substantive question coming from him and nothing that is critical of the other side, of which there is plenty...Ima stick to independent creators and OANN.
I only watch videos of Tucker Carlson. He’s been able to call out Soros and getting away with it, contrary to what Gingrich experienced with Faulkner. For the sake of it Tucker should invite Newt again on his show as a big FU to Brazile, Murdoch Jr. and Ryan.
That BS with Gingrich was BIZARRE and it's been effectively memory-holed.
Link to video/article? I definitely don't know what you're talking about, but would like to.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7GEd9iSi4g
Actually, Harris Faulkner apologized to Fox viewers the next day about it & said she should have called it out right when it happened. She assured viewers that what happened to Gingrich was wrong & it wouldn't happen again on her show.
I was surprised he didn't, but not surprised super Trump supporter Laura Ingraham had him on the night of the debate and they both trashed Chris Wallace.
Remember that faggy weightlifting photoshoot he did for Time? Fuck what a doucher.
Or Donna Brazile
Donna Brazile was the final nail in the coffin for me. I don't even visit their shitty site anymore for any purpose.