But I've seen Scalia argue he doesn't agree that the 14th amendment originally meant that the bill of rights was supposed to apply to the states. So do you think the fact it is currently interpreted as such go hand in hand with a ruling like Row V Wade?
I don't think so but I'd like a lawyers opinion on why not, unless you think it might...
Fourteenth amendment right?
But I've seen Scalia argue he doesn't agree that the 14th amendment originally meant that the bill of rights was supposed to apply to the states. So do you think the fact it is currently interpreted as such go hand in hand with a ruling like Row V Wade?
I don't think so but I'd like a lawyers opinion on why not, unless you think it might...