I'm not angry because that's new information. It doesn't change what I said - at the time no one had that information and reporting that he said it was all but fake news at that point, and the fact that we've been inundated with "anonymous" quotes that turned out later to be deep state operatives is still the case and is still a very good reason to be skeptical of "anonymous sources familiar".
You were angry. Look at your response. We had enough evidence to put 2 and 2 together. I don’t trust Meadows. Sundance at the Conservative Treehouse doesn’t either.
Can’t imagine how angry you are going to be now that there is more confirmation of you being wrong.
https://twitter.com/tea_1773/status/1312788441327759361?s=20
I'm not angry because that's new information. It doesn't change what I said - at the time no one had that information and reporting that he said it was all but fake news at that point, and the fact that we've been inundated with "anonymous" quotes that turned out later to be deep state operatives is still the case and is still a very good reason to be skeptical of "anonymous sources familiar".
You were angry. Look at your response. We had enough evidence to put 2 and 2 together. I don’t trust Meadows. Sundance at the Conservative Treehouse doesn’t either.