Annoying people come in every flavor. If you're a smart woman and a man is talking down to you, he's gonna look like an idiot. Just look at Kayleigh, you think she spends her free time fuming about dumb people? No, because a legendary valkyrie's time is too valuable for that. Just stay classy and correct, be the best, and pick up your binder and leave them behind when the job is done.
At this point, the UN has become so ridiculous that it's like their statements are composed by a group of teenage girls that start a commie club in their junior high. It's like Digrassi High but instead of being teenage girls, it's all the misfit cousins of two bit tin pot dictators who say all this crap to impress he 20 something year old white women who run around getting them coffee in the UN building. Unbeknowst to those women, the misfit cousins are all misogynists who have harems full of slave girls in their home countries and half of them go to Thailand to buy a night with children. Seriously, the UN is full of sex traffickers, pedophiles and sexual degeneracy. Every time they have a conference, it's surrounded by prostitution, sex trafficking, pedophile rings and all sort of debauchery. The they come out and publish absurd statements like this. The Democrat media lies about how disgusting the UN is though because for some reason, Communists love international pretend bodies of law that say silly things but assist in global human trafficking. Next time, the UN asks you to give to UNICEF or one of their charities, remember, they aren't their to help victims. They are there to victimize the victims all over again while pretending to "care" so stupid naive liberals go Ohhhh and Ahhhh at them. Establishment Dems know the UN is crap. That's why you never see establishment Dems bother with the UN unless it's to hamstring or demonize a Republican.
I hate to sound like a feminist, but this will have an even worse effect on women. Mansplaning is an important part of the human mating process. Women are able to weed out the stupid men from the Chad's based on their mansplaning skills. The most desirable men will have a wide body of knowledge and be able to explain things without talking down to others and looking arrogant. Keeping men quiet and afraid to talk in social settings is just another way to socially engineer a dumber more compliant society.
Jokes on them, this doesn't prevent me from asking questions that ultimately lead a woman into a rage when she follows the logical conclusions of her own beliefs.
I'm not explaining anything, merely accepted mutual premises ("would you agree that X...?") Then marching forward ("would you agree that Y is bad? So if X and Y, how is Z, which could be described as X and Y in such and such way, a good/bad thing?")
I avoid "being male while explaining" by remembering that if the woman needs an explanation, she shouldn't be here, and reporting her incompetence to get her fired will not only be profitable for Brand, but also way more fun than trying to teach someone unwilling to learn.
However men's intelligence distribution has a higher SPREAD (so men vary more across intelligence while women are more concentrated in the middle).
The end result is that while, true, among the stupidest people there will be a man majority, so it is true that there will also be a man majority among the brightest people.
Now ask yourself: should you be taking advice from people in the low-end, in the middle-end or in the high-end of intelligence? That's it.
We don't go for a random hobo to get an opinion on, say, particle physics. The ones whose opinion are often sought after are at the very top of their fields. More often than not, evolution saw to it that "intelligence spread" in females was detrimental ( = better to have every woman somewhat intelligent) and encouraged in males ( = we can afford to let the less intelligent men die without producing offspring). One random man's base value for the species is smaller than that of one random woman. It is the tribe fight strength recomposition issue, one man standing with 10 women recompose the tribe strength faster than 1 woman with 10 men.
You can see it in action when you consider that for the GREATEST PART of human history there was widespread practice of concubinage (nords, asia, africa, etc) or multiple wives.
Definitely not, I've got good marks here and there on intelligence tests (which as a whole favor systemizing over empathizing).
That is also why autism (a condition that is characterized by a dominance of systematization intelligence) is so much more prevalent among boys than girls, even to the point where it has produced the so called "extreme male brain theory".
That is up for debate. There was not much investigation on this with controlled environments for male-female before the aftermath of 1945 and the whole "intelligence research is taboo" conundrum it created across ethnicity (and consequently sex).
Though the odds of it being the same are not any better than having the women (or men) on average ahead, the point I tried to defend was that as a whole the debate over the average doesn't really matter either, seeing as the whole point of "taking advice" is to take it from the best person possible and those will be men in each and every area of human activity that is better understood with a systemizing approach (the sciences notably).
That first line you criticized works as "insurance", proving the point of representation on the top being male-dominated as natural even if you concede the average. It works quite fine among people when you measure indirect indicators for intelligence such as # PhD titles earned by men and women, # of men and women enrolled in higher education programs, etc.
Americans are urging we toss the UN out
Except this indicates the gender binary is back, baby!
Shhhh, don’t tell them. The end result is the left circles back to cancel the UN. ;-)
Trump needs to announce that he's kicking the UN out of NYC.
Let them go to Saudi Arabia or China were they belong.
They won't be able to go anywhere onve we stop funding them lol
Annoying people come in every flavor. If you're a smart woman and a man is talking down to you, he's gonna look like an idiot. Just look at Kayleigh, you think she spends her free time fuming about dumb people? No, because a legendary valkyrie's time is too valuable for that. Just stay classy and correct, be the best, and pick up your binder and leave them behind when the job is done.
At this point, the UN has become so ridiculous that it's like their statements are composed by a group of teenage girls that start a commie club in their junior high. It's like Digrassi High but instead of being teenage girls, it's all the misfit cousins of two bit tin pot dictators who say all this crap to impress he 20 something year old white women who run around getting them coffee in the UN building. Unbeknowst to those women, the misfit cousins are all misogynists who have harems full of slave girls in their home countries and half of them go to Thailand to buy a night with children. Seriously, the UN is full of sex traffickers, pedophiles and sexual degeneracy. Every time they have a conference, it's surrounded by prostitution, sex trafficking, pedophile rings and all sort of debauchery. The they come out and publish absurd statements like this. The Democrat media lies about how disgusting the UN is though because for some reason, Communists love international pretend bodies of law that say silly things but assist in global human trafficking. Next time, the UN asks you to give to UNICEF or one of their charities, remember, they aren't their to help victims. They are there to victimize the victims all over again while pretending to "care" so stupid naive liberals go Ohhhh and Ahhhh at them. Establishment Dems know the UN is crap. That's why you never see establishment Dems bother with the UN unless it's to hamstring or demonize a Republican.
Sexism.
Oh, wait... people of color can hate Caucasians and that is not racism. So this is not sexism.
I get it now.
Sheesh.
I hate to sound like a feminist, but this will have an even worse effect on women. Mansplaning is an important part of the human mating process. Women are able to weed out the stupid men from the Chad's based on their mansplaning skills. The most desirable men will have a wide body of knowledge and be able to explain things without talking down to others and looking arrogant. Keeping men quiet and afraid to talk in social settings is just another way to socially engineer a dumber more compliant society.
You sound logical, which is the opposite of a feminist, so you're alright!
Someone jog my memory, please: Was bullshit like this a part of the original UN charter?
Didn't think so.
Throw the UN the hell out of the US. And withdraw our membership.
Jokes on them, this doesn't prevent me from asking questions that ultimately lead a woman into a rage when she follows the logical conclusions of her own beliefs.
I'm not explaining anything, merely accepted mutual premises ("would you agree that X...?") Then marching forward ("would you agree that Y is bad? So if X and Y, how is Z, which could be described as X and Y in such and such way, a good/bad thing?")
Don't care. Next...
What is this "UN" they are talking about?
Its slang for "unable to overthrow Ametica"
I avoid "being male while explaining" by remembering that if the woman needs an explanation, she shouldn't be here, and reporting her incompetence to get her fired will not only be profitable for Brand, but also way more fun than trying to teach someone unwilling to learn.
I just assume Females are equally smart and Explain nothing to them and Wave goodbye when they're fired..
Funny, women ARE INDEED SMARTER on AVERAGE.
However men's intelligence distribution has a higher SPREAD (so men vary more across intelligence while women are more concentrated in the middle).
The end result is that while, true, among the stupidest people there will be a man majority, so it is true that there will also be a man majority among the brightest people.
Now ask yourself: should you be taking advice from people in the low-end, in the middle-end or in the high-end of intelligence? That's it.
We don't go for a random hobo to get an opinion on, say, particle physics. The ones whose opinion are often sought after are at the very top of their fields. More often than not, evolution saw to it that "intelligence spread" in females was detrimental ( = better to have every woman somewhat intelligent) and encouraged in males ( = we can afford to let the less intelligent men die without producing offspring). One random man's base value for the species is smaller than that of one random woman. It is the tribe fight strength recomposition issue, one man standing with 10 women recompose the tribe strength faster than 1 woman with 10 men.
You can see it in action when you consider that for the GREATEST PART of human history there was widespread practice of concubinage (nords, asia, africa, etc) or multiple wives.
You're an idiot, so they are clearly smarter than you on average.
Definitely not, I've got good marks here and there on intelligence tests (which as a whole favor systemizing over empathizing).
That is also why autism (a condition that is characterized by a dominance of systematization intelligence) is so much more prevalent among boys than girls, even to the point where it has produced the so called "extreme male brain theory".
Intelligence distribution between men and women is different, but the average is the same.
That is up for debate. There was not much investigation on this with controlled environments for male-female before the aftermath of 1945 and the whole "intelligence research is taboo" conundrum it created across ethnicity (and consequently sex).
Though the odds of it being the same are not any better than having the women (or men) on average ahead, the point I tried to defend was that as a whole the debate over the average doesn't really matter either, seeing as the whole point of "taking advice" is to take it from the best person possible and those will be men in each and every area of human activity that is better understood with a systemizing approach (the sciences notably).
That first line you criticized works as "insurance", proving the point of representation on the top being male-dominated as natural even if you concede the average. It works quite fine among people when you measure indirect indicators for intelligence such as # PhD titles earned by men and women, # of men and women enrolled in higher education programs, etc.
Used car salesmen love this one simple trick.
So there are only 2 genders ! Lolololol
Okay, fine. No help for the enemy. No problem for me.
Can we convince them taking our tax money is anti-feminist?
The enemy? You think women are the enemy?......
Well, they make up the majority of BLM supporters.