Wikipedia on Hunter Biden: He has been the subject of debunked right-wing conspiracy theories concerning his business dealings in Ukraine.
(media.patriots.win)
posted ago by EuropeisFinished
+1095 / -0
Comments (47)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
Front
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
Ah yes, fully debunked. The "I dindu nuffins' defense works great for Democrats.
TIL Senate intelligence supports are just "conspiracy theories"
It’s debunked because Democrats say it is lol
As Maria B said " debunked by whom?"
His Dad said they were
His dad also said he doesn't have any idea what he was doing there because they never discussed business.
I've read every "debunking" article from every major shitty "news" source like the NYT. You can read their entire argument, and it still leaves 100% unanswered questions.
The smoothbrains they market to don't read past the headline anyway.
It's weird cuz I know a libtard who referred me to a Washington Post article meant to debunk the Biden Ukraine scandal but after reading it it honestly just made Hunter Biden and Joe Biden look even worse. Yet since the article itself was claiming it debunked the scandal, in her mind it had debunked the scandal so she can move on and not think about it anymore.
Eventually you just reach a point where you don't even know how to argue with liberals anymore. Whatever the New York Times and The Washington Post say, that's what's true. There is no thinking involved, they just kind of absorb their opinions from the outside and leave it at that. Nothing else processes in their mind.
"Did you actually read it?"
My favorite thing to ask
Joe Biden's campaign spokesperson.
This is why wikipedia isn't a valid source. It has lots of ferociously defended lies. But to little point as looking at the edits or talk page reveals them.
In some very rare cases they can purge the edit history as well.
Interestingly, one page with purged edits is the Epstein page.
But don't worry, as soon as enough people start checking the history, they'll make it more difficult or require you to log in.
if you really think about it it's actually extremely sad because it would definitely end up being one of the most important resources in all of human history.... Just imagine how we feel about what could have been with the library of Alexandria if we had access to its full contents today, before they were destroyed, lost, or dispersed throughout the world... Well now just imagine if Wikipedia was actually what it was supposed to be or what it was advertised to be.... It would make the library of Alexandria look like a magazine rack at your local 7-Eleven.....
I am definitely afraid that we have waited far too long to start trying to take the road we're trying to take now... I think even Trump knows that and probably wishes he had pulled the trigger about 15+ years earlier....
I believe Wikipedia takes input from the public. If that's the case I'm sure democrats have figured out how to weaponize it for their own purposes.
The whole "anyone can edit wikipedia" think hasn't been true for about 10-15 years at least. Every edit must go through a cabal of radical Leftists power-users, and most articles are outright written by them and then locked for future editing.
Lol.... The public writes wikipedia.... It's public editors and they are almost exclusively liberal and the ones that aren't get overruled.
I've had a teacher or two that would fail you if you used Wikipedia as a source. They knew.
I had a professor tell me all papers needed reliable sources, he said "Wikipedia is very biased and not considered a reliable source."
Yep. They are few and far between but there are definitely some great teachers out there
Suuuuure. Thanks, Wikipedia.
Looks like the record needs to be corrected.
Good luck. If you edit that Wikipedia article with accurate information and references to the documents, the Wiki staff will change it right back. Its the behavior that renders Wikipedia worthless by poisoning the well.
Interestingly enough I had edited an article about Robert Hunter, Grateful Dead lyricist, with source material I recorded at a concert describing how he wrote the lyrics for the song “West LA Fadeaway”. He mentioned how people think it’s about John Belushi s as ndvthst wasn’t the case, words right from the artists mouth and the fucking deleted it since it didn’t sit well with them. Orwellian bullshit.
Who investigated Hunter Biden so far? News? other Left-wingers? Their "debunked" statement is basically them saying "nuh uh!"
Hunter Biden has never directly disavowed NAMBLA
Or the Super Adventure Club
Must be nice having all things tech covering your crimes.
Demopedia protecting their corruption.
They also defend D-pedos
Debunked!?!?! Denied, yes. Debunked, no.
But come on, I mean if this Wikipedia info is ALSO confirmed by Snopes, well then I think it becomes clear that you all need to just drop it and admit you have been wrong about Hunter. Especially seeing as how Brian Stelter says the same thing....
Debunked meaning factually true and supported by evidence and witness testimony?
Look up the entry (history) on Wikipedia for the Diaspora Social Media Network. It's a child-porn and human smuggling ring and Wikipedia keeps removing any mention of their crimes.
Democrats render words completely useless. Debunked is now in the same category as racist, meaningless.
Yep, Just as debunked as pizzagate
[Citation needed]
Hillary Clinton’s rationale for everything crooked she’s ever done.
Wikipedia is now as accurate as Snopes. Good bye, Wikipedia. I used to love you.
It’s amazing how easy it is to debunk all the theories about corruption by Democrats. If only Republicans practiced simple, easy to debunk corruption so we could just get on with life...nothing to see here, folks!
Wikipedia is commie propaganda
Wikipedia is factual has been fully debunked
God I can't wait to win again and lock this little fuck up. Then we can stick that in their wikianus.