4677
Comments (242)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
incogneato 4 points ago +4 / -0

as I understand it, HCQ helps to fight off whatever is attacking you through mobilizing zinc into the cells. I don't think it's considered an "anti-viral" per se.

Viruses are extremely nasty and weird little entities that are very, very hard to kill. Anti-viral medications are relatively new and also very expensive - sometimes thousands for a single dose, as remdesivir is said to be.

HCQ is very inexpensive, has been around in one form or another for literally a hundred years, and is very safe and well understood. If taken at the first symptoms, it's said to be very effective against the 'rona and if I should come down with it, the HCQ regimen is what I would want.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
incogneato 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, something like remdesivir is much more high-powered and tends to work better, afaik, if used for a patient who did not get treatment right away.

But a high-powered treatment also has the potential for high-powered side effects, so you have to balance risk vs. benefit as doctors always do. These new anti-virals are also extremely expensive, especially compared to the HCQ regimen.

And you're right about remdesivir not being used for outpatients - it is directed to be administered via IV in hospital:

https://www.remdesivir.com/us/dosing-administration/

-2
Grond999 -2 points ago +1 / -3

HCQ helps to fight off whatever is attacking you through mobilizing zinc into the cells. I don't think it's considered an "anti-viral" per se.

Incorrect.