I’m gonna have to agree. There wouldn’t be any liberal politics without women in the system. Democrats virtue signaling for women’s votes are how we get all these leftist policies.
Oddly enough, women are more miserable and depressed than ever, despite all the feminist movements and such that have taken place...its almost like feminism is just a bunch of angry women with no direction in life...hmmmm.
The first battle on traditional family was giving women the right to vote which led to a lot of things such as no fault divorces and abortion. Sure there are a lot of based women but there are even more who aren't.
We can fight against the ocean all we want but eventually it's going to get us wet.
Yeah I agree but it's ultimately a fight against nature. Unfortunately the main wants and desires of women in general are communistic in nature. (Not all but most)
Wanting a
government sponsored safety net, desire for everyone to agree and behave alike (just look at how most use shame and other underhand tactics to gain consensus), having a special status within the party, being guided but having the illusion of achievement, and the big one feeling independent of men now that the govt ensures her "success" and reaffirms her "equality" through superiority over men.
I think it might be better if we made votes based on intact family units and households or domestic partnerships or something. If you’re a mother and father currently raising 9 kids, you’ll still get 1 vote together. But if those kids go on to start their own families or something, they then get a bunch of votes once they do. Domestic partnerships still lets gay people get in there, or people that don’t want kids together.
Not a perfect system by any means, but seems way less prone to all the bullshit the democrat party tries. Illegal aliens can’t vote in this system of course. Also encourages people to start families and removes short term benefits from them growing to an unreasonable size. Maybe also don’t let people vote if they’re living entirely off the government or something at the time. If you’re not productively moving the system forward, maybe you don’t get a vote. If your household isn’t together enough that you can vote as one united, then maybe your household’s too fucked up to vote.
You mean the ones we used to shun and not accept in polite society? Back when we culled our nuts and called out deviant behavior? Back when it was ok to have right and wrong, acceptable and unacceptable. Back before women started voting.......
I’m gonna have to agree. There wouldn’t be any liberal politics without women in the system. Democrats virtue signaling for women’s votes are how we get all these leftist policies.
Oddly enough, women are more miserable and depressed than ever, despite all the feminist movements and such that have taken place...its almost like feminism is just a bunch of angry women with no direction in life...hmmmm.
The first battle on traditional family was giving women the right to vote which led to a lot of things such as no fault divorces and abortion. Sure there are a lot of based women but there are even more who aren't.
We can fight against the ocean all we want but eventually it's going to get us wet.
But there's no un-opening this can of worms. You don't win over people by taking their rights away.
Yeah I agree but it's ultimately a fight against nature. Unfortunately the main wants and desires of women in general are communistic in nature. (Not all but most)
Wanting a government sponsored safety net, desire for everyone to agree and behave alike (just look at how most use shame and other underhand tactics to gain consensus), having a special status within the party, being guided but having the illusion of achievement, and the big one feeling independent of men now that the govt ensures her "success" and reaffirms her "equality" through superiority over men.
I think it might be better if we made votes based on intact family units and households or domestic partnerships or something. If you’re a mother and father currently raising 9 kids, you’ll still get 1 vote together. But if those kids go on to start their own families or something, they then get a bunch of votes once they do. Domestic partnerships still lets gay people get in there, or people that don’t want kids together.
Not a perfect system by any means, but seems way less prone to all the bullshit the democrat party tries. Illegal aliens can’t vote in this system of course. Also encourages people to start families and removes short term benefits from them growing to an unreasonable size. Maybe also don’t let people vote if they’re living entirely off the government or something at the time. If you’re not productively moving the system forward, maybe you don’t get a vote. If your household isn’t together enough that you can vote as one united, then maybe your household’s too fucked up to vote.
See my tax-based approach above.
You apparently don't get politics. Do you want a conservative justice confirmed and also want to win an election?
Don't forget about the sodomites
Name checks out
You mean the ones we used to shun and not accept in polite society? Back when we culled our nuts and called out deviant behavior? Back when it was ok to have right and wrong, acceptable and unacceptable. Back before women started voting.......