4420
Comments (347)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
18
SchmoeBiden 18 points ago +35 / -17

But only one of us should be voting...

13
kilimanjaro2x 13 points ago +16 / -3

1 family 1 vote

21
HockeyMom4Trump 21 points ago +23 / -2

1 taxpayer, 1 vote.

10
signalfixer 10 points ago +10 / -0

I agree with you wholeheartedly. Been saying this for years. If a person has paid more into the system than they have taken, they get to vote. That's as fair as it can get.

7
DeportAntifa 7 points ago +7 / -0

I think just restricting voting rights to productive members of society would do it. If someone is a literal drain on the rest of us, why would I give a single fuck what their opinion is. I think this is actually important and needs to change.

2
UpTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

100% agree. However, once rights are given they cannot be taken away (in practice), and the only way to fix this is... you know

3
Redclyde 3 points ago +5 / -2

If you filed taxes you can vote. Mandatory abortion unless you pass a credit check and handguns handed to children in school this my platform

2
kilimanjaro2x 2 points ago +2 / -0

Based

1
BallsackPaneer 1 point ago +4 / -3

And just to seal up all loopholes in the age of leftist attorneys:

2 families, still 1 vote.

Sorry DollarBill, you still only get one vote.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
-1
trollkin0331 -1 points ago +3 / -4

Yeah, all those frontier women regularly participating on internet forums.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
2
trollkin0331 2 points ago +4 / -2

You have quite the pedestal there.

I can also make false dichotomies.

Trump is an urban man btw.

9
deleted 9 points ago +21 / -12
16
deleted 16 points ago +19 / -3
2
deleted 2 points ago +7 / -5
10
DrCowboyPresident 10 points ago +12 / -2

Foolish? Look at the outcomes before and after universal suffrage. Socialism made a hard run at the US in the early 20th century. Interesting timing...1920. Then not too long later, FDR is running rampant.

I think a change that would hurt fee-fees the least is to limit voting to people who own property/pay taxes, but that'll never happen either.

Universal suffrage is a ratchet that, once turned, can never be turned back. That's why these decisions are dangerous to make. To say the ideas being expressed are foolish is to call the Founders idiots.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
trollkin0331 2 points ago +3 / -1

Feminine men get into office because ~50% of the vote, post suffrage, votes for feminine traits by default. The feminine candidate then only needs to capture a small % of the male votes to secure office.

9
DonJr2032 9 points ago +18 / -9

I disagree, for reasons I just outlined.

3
trollkin0331 3 points ago +7 / -4

Voting != building a society.

Masculine virtue is required to effectively run a nation. Feminine virtue is counterproductive to that end and is best placed elsewhere than at the governmental level.

Women voting means candidates now have to appeal to a massive section of the population that will, almost to an individual, vote for feminine traits.

What do you think leftism is? Leftism is the government that is a result of feminine traits.

Society is absolutely best served when women don't vote.