I guess thats one way to put it. Really its that women tend to let their emotions rule over them, they vote and think in line with their emotions. Crying kids, mean words, social pressure can all easily sway their mindsets.
Instead of critically thinking about what is best, they let their feelings guide them.
At the end of the day though i lay blame at the feet of weak men who have allowed women to walk all over them and think through emotion aswell.
Conservative women with conservative men in their lives are better off.
Agreed, but it goes deeper than emotion. They are philosophical zombies with a tint of solipsism. Their mental process (which includes political ideas) consists of the conjectural question "how would I behave if other people besides me actually existed?"
This mental process is excellent for social nesting and raising their children (an extension of themselves). It is positively miserable for maintaining a cogent civilization.
That doesnt seem like a problem at all. Empathy is part of why western civilization is so much better than robotic civilizations like china or barbaric ones like african states. That question sounds like the age old "treat others as i would like to be treated."
Empathy and altruism, which stem from emotion, is only bad if it passes into pathological territory like it has for the west. Disregarding statistical facts and trying to treat everyone as if they are inherently nice and good. That a hug will bring world peace.
No, we agree. It's good when women behave like women, but when they attempt to take up the roles of men, they usher in the pathological and, frankly, apocalyptic scenario that you describe.
I guess thats one way to put it. Really its that women tend to let their emotions rule over them, they vote and think in line with their emotions. Crying kids, mean words, social pressure can all easily sway their mindsets.
Instead of critically thinking about what is best, they let their feelings guide them.
At the end of the day though i lay blame at the feet of weak men who have allowed women to walk all over them and think through emotion aswell.
Conservative women with conservative men in their lives are better off.
Agreed, but it goes deeper than emotion. They are philosophical zombies with a tint of solipsism. Their mental process (which includes political ideas) consists of the conjectural question "how would I behave if other people besides me actually existed?"
This mental process is excellent for social nesting and raising their children (an extension of themselves). It is positively miserable for maintaining a cogent civilization.
That doesnt seem like a problem at all. Empathy is part of why western civilization is so much better than robotic civilizations like china or barbaric ones like african states. That question sounds like the age old "treat others as i would like to be treated."
Empathy and altruism, which stem from emotion, is only bad if it passes into pathological territory like it has for the west. Disregarding statistical facts and trying to treat everyone as if they are inherently nice and good. That a hug will bring world peace.
Unless ive misinterpreted what you mean.
No, we agree. It's good when women behave like women, but when they attempt to take up the roles of men, they usher in the pathological and, frankly, apocalyptic scenario that you describe.