And now the "AeRoSoLs LiNgEr In ThE aIr" . . . . so you breath out, it doesnt go straight it goes sideways and people still walk through it. it's BULLSHIT
It proves there's still a massive cloud all around you and masks do nothing except direct the exhaust, so to speak. It's unscientific virtue signalling. If covid were truly some deadly disease and it was going to kill you if you got it, then these masks would not make you feel safer at all.
It's not nitpicking. The same bullshit science being used to force people to wear masks, and the same bullshit government overreach involved when they do it, is the same thing behind all the other bullshit, including forcing nursing homes to take new members, forcing businesses to shut down, etc.
If people want to wear masks, they can. But don't force me to wear them when the whole notion of them is mediocre at best and complete bullshit at worst.
The transmission is still unclear between airborne and droplet. The demonstration shows the behavior of air using various masks. It's cool to see, however masks are almost completely ineffective against airborne diseases, so it doesn't change anything if covid is airborne. If it were airborne we would see transmission at a much higher rate. Or, maybe it is airborne and we are severely underestimating the total number of infected people, and we'd be close, if not beyond, herd immunity.
I've seen your other posts pointing out the difference between air behaviors and masks, but it doesn't matter if it's airborne.
The 6' rule is for droplet transmission; droplets fall to the ground quickly and 6' is a safe recommendation to give droplets the space/time to fall. We are all taught to cover our nose and mouth when we sneeze or cough. The reason is to contain droplets. The mask is doing the same thing. Since social distancing protocols are adopted in every public setting, then what is really the point of the mask?
IMO, masks have given people a false sense of security. Social distancing, sneezing/coughing etiquette, and proper hygiene are far more effective than masks.
What does matter is the amount of touching masks cause. Face touching, mask touching, etc.
People are constantly readjusting them. People have been been told to sneeze directly into their masks! Wtf? If you are sick, that's the fastest way to get others sick.
This demonstration also shows that masks will shoot the virus everywhere in a wider cloud. Sure that might not matter because you'd say "lower viral load!" Except people breath about once a second. So if you're standing in like at the supermarket, for example, you're shooting the virus everywhere around you. Up into the air so it can remain airborne for even longer. And according to the cdc it is airborne.
My argument for masks was that it likely reduces viral load. If someone sneezes in your face its more likely the mucus and saliva will cause the infection than the aerosol particles because the viral load is MUCH higher in the larger droplets than in the smaller droplets.
Viruses and bacteria are all around you at all times and many people who are asymptotic likely had an exposure but their bodies were able to get it under control before the virus resulted in any symptoms. If you are hit with a larger viral load (i.e. many more viruses) then its likely to replicate in you faster than your body can respond.
Just because there are many conspiracies and the media is garbage doesn't mean we have to be against everything the media takes a side on. Also, it doesn't have to be 100% for it not be somewhat effective or reasonable to use. Condoms aren't 100% either but I would recommend using them over not using them if you aren't willing to abstain from premarital sex.
That seems like everything to do with this post. The post is making the argument mask are ineffective and thus unnecessary. Why make the post at all if that's not the argument? Why make the argument at all? I understand people being upset with government mandates and I agree the government shouldn't mandate them and it should be individuals choice but there is no reason in making nit picking arguments over the effectiveness when all this post does is create emotional appeal (which is the very thing people are charging the left with doing!)
That seems like everything to do with this post. The post is making the argument mask are ineffective and thus unnecessary.
Which has nothing to do with posting because "there are many conspiracies and the media is garbage doesn't mean we have to be against everything the media takes a side on."
but there is no reason in making nit picking arguments over the effectiveness when all this post does is create emotional appeal
Nothing in this post is about appealing to emotion, or giving a giant F U to the media.
It’s more like trying to use field goals (American felonball) as a mosquito net, but you’ve got the right idea
No, instead it's concentrated into streams and blasts people all around you. The whole thing is a joke.
And now the "AeRoSoLs LiNgEr In ThE aIr" . . . . so you breath out, it doesnt go straight it goes sideways and people still walk through it. it's BULLSHIT
It proves there's still a massive cloud all around you and masks do nothing except direct the exhaust, so to speak. It's unscientific virtue signalling. If covid were truly some deadly disease and it was going to kill you if you got it, then these masks would not make you feel safer at all.
It's not nitpicking. The same bullshit science being used to force people to wear masks, and the same bullshit government overreach involved when they do it, is the same thing behind all the other bullshit, including forcing nursing homes to take new members, forcing businesses to shut down, etc.
If people want to wear masks, they can. But don't force me to wear them when the whole notion of them is mediocre at best and complete bullshit at worst.
Are you sure? To what degree are they better? In what situations?
no, diffusing is just as bad or worse.
In that case, if everyone rememberee to look downwards while breathing/talking, it would be just as good as wearing a slave symbol.
Just exhale softly through your nose. Problem solved!
The transmission is still unclear between airborne and droplet. The demonstration shows the behavior of air using various masks. It's cool to see, however masks are almost completely ineffective against airborne diseases, so it doesn't change anything if covid is airborne. If it were airborne we would see transmission at a much higher rate. Or, maybe it is airborne and we are severely underestimating the total number of infected people, and we'd be close, if not beyond, herd immunity.
I've seen your other posts pointing out the difference between air behaviors and masks, but it doesn't matter if it's airborne.
The 6' rule is for droplet transmission; droplets fall to the ground quickly and 6' is a safe recommendation to give droplets the space/time to fall. We are all taught to cover our nose and mouth when we sneeze or cough. The reason is to contain droplets. The mask is doing the same thing. Since social distancing protocols are adopted in every public setting, then what is really the point of the mask?
IMO, masks have given people a false sense of security. Social distancing, sneezing/coughing etiquette, and proper hygiene are far more effective than masks.
I think it does provide a helpful visual as to how ineffective masks are for the people who claim this virus is transmitted via aerosolization.
The 6 ft recommendation was WELL BEFORE masks. Just FYI.
Two weeks to slow the spread guys!
It only proves that masks redirect the air. IT doesn't prove they "Work"
None of that matters.
What does matter is the amount of touching masks cause. Face touching, mask touching, etc.
People are constantly readjusting them. People have been been told to sneeze directly into their masks! Wtf? If you are sick, that's the fastest way to get others sick.
This demonstration also shows that masks will shoot the virus everywhere in a wider cloud. Sure that might not matter because you'd say "lower viral load!" Except people breath about once a second. So if you're standing in like at the supermarket, for example, you're shooting the virus everywhere around you. Up into the air so it can remain airborne for even longer. And according to the cdc it is airborne.
My argument for masks was that it likely reduces viral load. If someone sneezes in your face its more likely the mucus and saliva will cause the infection than the aerosol particles because the viral load is MUCH higher in the larger droplets than in the smaller droplets.
Viruses and bacteria are all around you at all times and many people who are asymptotic likely had an exposure but their bodies were able to get it under control before the virus resulted in any symptoms. If you are hit with a larger viral load (i.e. many more viruses) then its likely to replicate in you faster than your body can respond.
Just because there are many conspiracies and the media is garbage doesn't mean we have to be against everything the media takes a side on. Also, it doesn't have to be 100% for it not be somewhat effective or reasonable to use. Condoms aren't 100% either but I would recommend using them over not using them if you aren't willing to abstain from premarital sex.
That has NOTHING to do with the purpose for, and cause behind, this post.
That seems like everything to do with this post. The post is making the argument mask are ineffective and thus unnecessary. Why make the post at all if that's not the argument? Why make the argument at all? I understand people being upset with government mandates and I agree the government shouldn't mandate them and it should be individuals choice but there is no reason in making nit picking arguments over the effectiveness when all this post does is create emotional appeal (which is the very thing people are charging the left with doing!)
Which has nothing to do with posting because "there are many conspiracies and the media is garbage doesn't mean we have to be against everything the media takes a side on."
Nothing in this post is about appealing to emotion, or giving a giant F U to the media.