Plenty of psychological studies of the two genders (muffled REEing in the distance) show that men are greater risk-takers and also far more prone to protest, act out, disagree, and disobey, both short-term and long-term.
If you keep a mask mandate up long enough, eventually it WILL be just women wearing them, statistically speaking. Barring outliers, obviously. Why make a strategic change when the result is probabilistically speaking going to go that way anyways?
They're just looking for a good reason to permit men to stop wearing masks, yet mandate that women continue wearing them.
Plenty of psychological studies of the two genders (muffled REEing in the distance) show that men are greater risk-takers and also far more prone to protest, act out, disagree, and disobey, both short-term and long-term.
If you keep a mask mandate up long enough, eventually it WILL be just women wearing them, statistically speaking. Barring outliers, obviously. Why make a strategic change when the result is probabilistically speaking going to go that way anyways?