Whats wrong with being far right? Right is better than wrong or sinister left, right is the only way to go, I'd go further right if I could think up how to.
Friend is probably a lefty to begin with. It's what they do to get an opinion about what others think so they can have the correct viewpoint. Kind of like how we do the same except it's to see what kind of lie we're about to be told.
Wikipedia -- Wiki-piece-of-shit. Glad I never donated. Stopped clicking their links on searches a year ago. Might as well be owned by Google. Maybe they are.
Could there be any bigger conspiracy theory than Russiagate? All news orgs that covered it should be noted for promoting falsehoods and conspiracy theories. Instead they get Pulitzer Prizes.
Point him to the sources of the "falsehoods and conspiracy theories." CNN, Washington Post, The Intercept, NY Times -- these are the sources claiming OAN deals in falsehood and conspiracy theories. Shocked. Cannot trust Wikipedia at all.
What's your point in sending me that link? It correctly notes that "the family sold 20th Century Fox to Disney." That has nothing to do with Fox News, which, along with a number of other media assets bearing the Fox name (including Fox Broadcasting Company, Fox Television Stations, Fox Business, and the national operations of Fox Sports), was not part of the sale. The assets that were not sold became part of the new Fox Corporation, which began trading on NASDAQ in March 2019. Disney has no ownership interest in Fox Corp.
It's a business. Its top priority is to generate profits for the benefit of its shareholders. It is doing a very good job of that, even in this very challenging pandemic-crippled economy. Fox News' overall ratings dwarf those of its cable news competitors CNN and MSNBC. Ad revenue drives all decisions of a TV broadcast or cable network. Very few advertisers are interested in advertising on a network with a narrow political allegiance, and no advertisers with large budgets are willing to pay top dollar to advertise on such a network -- it's a brand-damaging practice.
Future of OAN? Bc I’ve watched them over fox for years. Used to have almost no ads, now your typical buy gold/ED meds/Medicare advantage spots all over. They must be doing something right.
Herring Networks Inc., which owns and operates OAN, is a completely private company, controlled by Robert Herring and his son Charles Herring. Herring Sr. is independently wealthy as a result of business successes in unrelated industries. OAN is what he spends his money on. It is very unlikely that the company has ever turned a profit, though it may eventually do so. But it has no pressure from or obligation to shareholders to pursue profitability. It is essentially a philanthropic venture at this point, not a profit-seeking business.
You can be sure that advertisers are paying a lot less for ad time on OAN than on Fox News. There are still a lot of ads from small companies/ventures, selling narrowly targeted products like "Trumpy Bear" and a chess set featuring political figures. I have a lot of respect for what the Herrings are accomplishing with OAN, but it's certainly not a business I would invest in (if it was open to outside investors) with the expectation of capital gains or dividend income.
While conservatives believe in upholding the integrity of systems and would rather push things toward the middle, leftists have no problem with gaming the system to whatever end they seek and pushing it towards the far left by any means necessary, employing many people full time to take it over. In this way the leftists have a huge advantage on any site like wikipedia, reddit or social media.
remind your friend that (s)he should take some time to think for themselves and be open to new news sources and information. if they are scared off by "right-wing"... i hate to break it to you, but your friend is afraid of a boogeyman label.
also, wikipedia is cucked af, but trying to explain that to your friend is harder than just saying the above.
OAN is the only American news network that's actually covering US and world news. The rest of the networks just cover Trump 24/7. You'd think that nothing else is going on in the world judging by their coverage.
Wikipedia is an openly far left propaganda arm for the DNC in this country. The founder openly admitted it. Is that what the wikipedia page on wikipedia states? No?
Does he not see the fucking irony of him going to a biased source to find out the "truth" about other biased sources? It is fucking laughable how self unaware people are about themselves and their own idiocy.
Did you ask him if he knows the political leanings of wikipedia founder? No? Why doesn't he know, and why did he not want to find out?
why is everything “far right?” fuck off with this slanderous shit
When you are a communist, everything is far right.
The "Left Pole", like the North Pole, where every direction is south, the "Left Pole", every direction is right.
This....is.....true.
Anything to the right of Mao is now far right. Whatever that means.
And antifa is just an idea.
People who call others far right say far more about themselves.
Whats wrong with being far right? Right is better than wrong or sinister left, right is the only way to go, I'd go further right if I could think up how to.
I prefer being completely right, not just far right.
I'm twice are right as you are
mine goes to 11
Theres no "Bill of lefts" in the constitution, this is our country, not theirs.
That's how they signal they are about to shamelessly and flagrantly lie to you
It’s like a lawsuit waiting to happen.
Wikipedia called spygate a crocked up conspiracy by Donald Trump with no foundation in reality then locked it ...wikipedia is dogshit.
Anyone can edit Wikipedia. The most determined to source and remove biases often win.
Negative. Editing for many topics is limited to those with an extreme leftist viewpoint.
Well, if anybody can edit it, maybe somebody ought to set them straight on what OAN is really all about.
Trump network started in 2013. 🤔 Boy they just say whatever enters their head. 🤣
He Googled it? That's where he fucked up, kiddo.
How about just going to the site and forming an opinion on his own without a leftist telling him what to think? FFS.
Friend is probably a lefty to begin with. It's what they do to get an opinion about what others think so they can have the correct viewpoint. Kind of like how we do the same except it's to see what kind of lie we're about to be told.
LOL. What a bunch of horseshit.
No... what do I do?
Yeah, my fren wants to know!
Frens don't let frens get "skiddish".
Wikipedia -- Wiki-piece-of-shit. Glad I never donated. Stopped clicking their links on searches a year ago. Might as well be owned by Google. Maybe they are.
I hope that OANN deals with this bullshit
Could there be any bigger conspiracy theory than Russiagate? All news orgs that covered it should be noted for promoting falsehoods and conspiracy theories. Instead they get Pulitzer Prizes.
Again with the projection.
pssst. it's skittish. as in, horses are skittish...cars are skiddish.
Welcome to wikipedia.
Point him to the sources of the "falsehoods and conspiracy theories." CNN, Washington Post, The Intercept, NY Times -- these are the sources claiming OAN deals in falsehood and conspiracy theories. Shocked. Cannot trust Wikipedia at all.
You mean like the Russian conspiracy hoax? OAN tells the truths the left can't admit.
I dropped fox(w the exception of tucker) in 2016 when I saw how they treated ted cruz. It’s gotten worse since Disney bought them two years ago
One more time (sigh): Disney did not buy Fox News.
You're not wrong but at the same time fox news has hired Donna brazille and Paul Ryan. Murdochs kids are cucks, whether Disney is involved or not.
To be fair, there was a significant change in leadership at Fox News when Disney bought the Fox Network.
Agreed. I'm just saying it's understandable why people might make the mistake of assuming one led to the other. You're entirely correct, though.
I updooted for the "how they treated Ted Cruz" part, which was a clear flag for many.
https://townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/2020/10/15/the-ungrateful-generation-n2578065?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=10/15/2020&bcid=8a537fa7fba4b2176139bf57bb4d9ec2&recip=22264257
What's your point in sending me that link? It correctly notes that "the family sold 20th Century Fox to Disney." That has nothing to do with Fox News, which, along with a number of other media assets bearing the Fox name (including Fox Broadcasting Company, Fox Television Stations, Fox Business, and the national operations of Fox Sports), was not part of the sale. The assets that were not sold became part of the new Fox Corporation, which began trading on NASDAQ in March 2019. Disney has no ownership interest in Fox Corp.
Thanks for the clarification. What is causing Fox News recent squishiness in your estimation
It's a business. Its top priority is to generate profits for the benefit of its shareholders. It is doing a very good job of that, even in this very challenging pandemic-crippled economy. Fox News' overall ratings dwarf those of its cable news competitors CNN and MSNBC. Ad revenue drives all decisions of a TV broadcast or cable network. Very few advertisers are interested in advertising on a network with a narrow political allegiance, and no advertisers with large budgets are willing to pay top dollar to advertise on such a network -- it's a brand-damaging practice.
Future of OAN? Bc I’ve watched them over fox for years. Used to have almost no ads, now your typical buy gold/ED meds/Medicare advantage spots all over. They must be doing something right.
Herring Networks Inc., which owns and operates OAN, is a completely private company, controlled by Robert Herring and his son Charles Herring. Herring Sr. is independently wealthy as a result of business successes in unrelated industries. OAN is what he spends his money on. It is very unlikely that the company has ever turned a profit, though it may eventually do so. But it has no pressure from or obligation to shareholders to pursue profitability. It is essentially a philanthropic venture at this point, not a profit-seeking business.
You can be sure that advertisers are paying a lot less for ad time on OAN than on Fox News. There are still a lot of ads from small companies/ventures, selling narrowly targeted products like "Trumpy Bear" and a chess set featuring political figures. I have a lot of respect for what the Herrings are accomplishing with OAN, but it's certainly not a business I would invest in (if it was open to outside investors) with the expectation of capital gains or dividend income.
OAN needs to sue Wiki and every ass fucking shit stain who wrote that article.
"Wikipedia, a Far-Left cesspit of lies and propaganda."
He needs wikipedia's approval? What a cuck.
"Pro Donald Trump"
OANN was started in 2013, years before Trump decided to join the 2016 campaign. It says it right there!
While conservatives believe in upholding the integrity of systems and would rather push things toward the middle, leftists have no problem with gaming the system to whatever end they seek and pushing it towards the far left by any means necessary, employing many people full time to take it over. In this way the leftists have a huge advantage on any site like wikipedia, reddit or social media.
Sue! Now! Where’s that fancy lawyer? Send this to him! 🤗
"Ok google, please tell me what to think. Thanks google!"
To the normies that believe this shit, I wonder what news media they think are far left?
Wikipedia still around? I thought they were on the verge of going under with the way they always beg for money. Just typical leftist grifters I guess.
No. What do we do? Smack your friend and tell them not to be a bitch that believes wikipedia?
Why is your friend still using Google? Tell them to use DuckDuckGo!
remind your friend that (s)he should take some time to think for themselves and be open to new news sources and information. if they are scared off by "right-wing"... i hate to break it to you, but your friend is afraid of a boogeyman label.
also, wikipedia is cucked af, but trying to explain that to your friend is harder than just saying the above.
OAN is the only American news network that's actually covering US and world news. The rest of the networks just cover Trump 24/7. You'd think that nothing else is going on in the world judging by their coverage.
Tell him conspiracy is the same as collusion, and the mainstream media has been pushing false ones for the last 4 years (e.g. Russia-gate).
Wikipedia is an openly far left propaganda arm for the DNC in this country. The founder openly admitted it. Is that what the wikipedia page on wikipedia states? No?
which informed person in his right mind uses wikipedia as a political compass in today's day and age?
Does he not see the fucking irony of him going to a biased source to find out the "truth" about other biased sources? It is fucking laughable how self unaware people are about themselves and their own idiocy.
Did you ask him if he knows the political leanings of wikipedia founder? No? Why doesn't he know, and why did he not want to find out?
This is far right but the Wikipedia editors literally state that NY Times and CNN are considered the gold standard as sources. 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
"Conspiracy theory" aka true things that the MSM refuses to say actually happened to save their, and the DNC's asses.
FUCK YEAH FAR RIGHT MEDIA!!! heres some links to other good stuff off the OAN wikipedo page
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Conservative_media_in_the_United_States
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Far-right_politics_in_the_United_States
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_conspiracy_theories