1693
Comments (77)
sorted by:
159
snoopaluip 159 points ago +161 / -2

why is everything “far right?” fuck off with this slanderous shit

133
verycute 133 points ago +133 / -0

When you are a communist, everything is far right.

53
LesboPregnancyScare 53 points ago +53 / -0

The "Left Pole", like the North Pole, where every direction is south, the "Left Pole", every direction is right.

7
somedaysoon 7 points ago +7 / -0

This....is.....true.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
59
Cesare_Borgia 59 points ago +59 / -0

Anything to the right of Mao is now far right. Whatever that means.

31
bigdickhangsright 31 points ago +31 / -0

And antifa is just an idea.

27
jgardner 27 points ago +27 / -0

People who call others far right say far more about themselves.

17
unique_string 17 points ago +18 / -1

Whats wrong with being far right? Right is better than wrong or sinister left, right is the only way to go, I'd go further right if I could think up how to.

16
DaoDeDickinson 16 points ago +16 / -0

I prefer being completely right, not just far right.

9
unique_string 9 points ago +10 / -1

I'm twice are right as you are

4
cnn_can_dox_my_balls 4 points ago +4 / -0

mine goes to 11

2
unique_string 2 points ago +3 / -1

Theres no "Bill of lefts" in the constitution, this is our country, not theirs.

6
Unbent 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's how they signal they are about to shamelessly and flagrantly lie to you

88
cyber_acolyte 88 points ago +88 / -0

It’s like a lawsuit waiting to happen.

59
TheSuperStableGenius 59 points ago +59 / -0

Wikipedia called spygate a crocked up conspiracy by Donald Trump with no foundation in reality then locked it ...wikipedia is dogshit.

-1
CastleBravo -1 points ago +4 / -5

Anyone can edit Wikipedia. The most determined to source and remove biases often win.

23
Magafactured 23 points ago +23 / -0

Negative. Editing for many topics is limited to those with an extreme leftist viewpoint.

6
WorkingclassMarine 6 points ago +6 / -0

Well, if anybody can edit it, maybe somebody ought to set them straight on what OAN is really all about.

45
irspow 45 points ago +46 / -1

Trump network started in 2013. 🤔 Boy they just say whatever enters their head. 🤣

29
JerryNadlerBeltFund 29 points ago +29 / -0

He Googled it? That's where he fucked up, kiddo.

How about just going to the site and forming an opinion on his own without a leftist telling him what to think? FFS.

3
wiombims 3 points ago +3 / -0

Friend is probably a lefty to begin with. It's what they do to get an opinion about what others think so they can have the correct viewpoint. Kind of like how we do the same except it's to see what kind of lie we're about to be told.

22
dethstouch1482 22 points ago +22 / -0

LOL. What a bunch of horseshit.

22
FRENS 22 points ago +22 / -0

No... what do I do?

11
Skogin 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yeah, my fren wants to know!

8
SoldanoSlo 8 points ago +8 / -0

Frens don't let frens get "skiddish".

16
Trumpman1 16 points ago +16 / -0

Wikipedia -- Wiki-piece-of-shit. Glad I never donated. Stopped clicking their links on searches a year ago. Might as well be owned by Google. Maybe they are.

15
al45 15 points ago +15 / -0

I hope that OANN deals with this bullshit

15
spaceforce_chaplain 15 points ago +15 / -0

Could there be any bigger conspiracy theory than Russiagate? All news orgs that covered it should be noted for promoting falsehoods and conspiracy theories. Instead they get Pulitzer Prizes.

12
Yippy 12 points ago +12 / -0

Again with the projection.

10
snuggs316 10 points ago +10 / -0

pssst. it's skittish. as in, horses are skittish...cars are skiddish.

8
TrumpVictorious 8 points ago +8 / -0

Welcome to wikipedia.

7
jughaid 7 points ago +7 / -0

Point him to the sources of the "falsehoods and conspiracy theories." CNN, Washington Post, The Intercept, NY Times -- these are the sources claiming OAN deals in falsehood and conspiracy theories. Shocked. Cannot trust Wikipedia at all.

6
DaoDeDickinson 6 points ago +6 / -0

You mean like the Russian conspiracy hoax? OAN tells the truths the left can't admit.

5
Shemp 5 points ago +13 / -8

I dropped fox(w the exception of tucker) in 2016 when I saw how they treated ted cruz. It’s gotten worse since Disney bought them two years ago

21
Deplora 21 points ago +22 / -1

One more time (sigh): Disney did not buy Fox News.

11
Cesare_Borgia 11 points ago +11 / -0

You're not wrong but at the same time fox news has hired Donna brazille and Paul Ryan. Murdochs kids are cucks, whether Disney is involved or not.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
JeremiahKassin 2 points ago +2 / -0

To be fair, there was a significant change in leadership at Fox News when Disney bought the Fox Network.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
JeremiahKassin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. I'm just saying it's understandable why people might make the mistake of assuming one led to the other. You're entirely correct, though.

1
Litecola 1 point ago +1 / -0

I updooted for the "how they treated Ted Cruz" part, which was a clear flag for many.

1
0
Deplora 0 points ago +1 / -1

What's your point in sending me that link? It correctly notes that "the family sold 20th Century Fox to Disney." That has nothing to do with Fox News, which, along with a number of other media assets bearing the Fox name (including Fox Broadcasting Company, Fox Television Stations, Fox Business, and the national operations of Fox Sports), was not part of the sale. The assets that were not sold became part of the new Fox Corporation, which began trading on NASDAQ in March 2019. Disney has no ownership interest in Fox Corp.

1
Shemp 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for the clarification. What is causing Fox News recent squishiness in your estimation

0
Deplora 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's a business. Its top priority is to generate profits for the benefit of its shareholders. It is doing a very good job of that, even in this very challenging pandemic-crippled economy. Fox News' overall ratings dwarf those of its cable news competitors CNN and MSNBC. Ad revenue drives all decisions of a TV broadcast or cable network. Very few advertisers are interested in advertising on a network with a narrow political allegiance, and no advertisers with large budgets are willing to pay top dollar to advertise on such a network -- it's a brand-damaging practice.

1
Shemp 1 point ago +1 / -0

Future of OAN? Bc I’ve watched them over fox for years. Used to have almost no ads, now your typical buy gold/ED meds/Medicare advantage spots all over. They must be doing something right.

0
Deplora 0 points ago +1 / -1

Herring Networks Inc., which owns and operates OAN, is a completely private company, controlled by Robert Herring and his son Charles Herring. Herring Sr. is independently wealthy as a result of business successes in unrelated industries. OAN is what he spends his money on. It is very unlikely that the company has ever turned a profit, though it may eventually do so. But it has no pressure from or obligation to shareholders to pursue profitability. It is essentially a philanthropic venture at this point, not a profit-seeking business.

You can be sure that advertisers are paying a lot less for ad time on OAN than on Fox News. There are still a lot of ads from small companies/ventures, selling narrowly targeted products like "Trumpy Bear" and a chess set featuring political figures. I have a lot of respect for what the Herrings are accomplishing with OAN, but it's certainly not a business I would invest in (if it was open to outside investors) with the expectation of capital gains or dividend income.

5
Thingthing22 5 points ago +5 / -0

OAN needs to sue Wiki and every ass fucking shit stain who wrote that article.

4
PropagandaWizard1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Wikipedia, a Far-Left cesspit of lies and propaganda."

4
Alpha_plus 4 points ago +4 / -0

He needs wikipedia's approval? What a cuck.

4
LesboPregnancyScare 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Pro Donald Trump"

OANN was started in 2013, years before Trump decided to join the 2016 campaign. It says it right there!

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
Pede 3 points ago +3 / -0

While conservatives believe in upholding the integrity of systems and would rather push things toward the middle, leftists have no problem with gaming the system to whatever end they seek and pushing it towards the far left by any means necessary, employing many people full time to take it over. In this way the leftists have a huge advantage on any site like wikipedia, reddit or social media.

2
Lioncat331 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sue! Now! Where’s that fancy lawyer? Send this to him! 🤗

2
Anotheronelikethis 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Ok google, please tell me what to think. Thanks google!"

2
Rockmanneo 2 points ago +2 / -0

To the normies that believe this shit, I wonder what news media they think are far left?

2
No_Fun_Allowed 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wikipedia still around? I thought they were on the verge of going under with the way they always beg for money. Just typical leftist grifters I guess.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
not_a_shill 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. What do we do? Smack your friend and tell them not to be a bitch that believes wikipedia?

1
milkboy33 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why is your friend still using Google? Tell them to use DuckDuckGo!

1
Thecryptoclub 1 point ago +1 / -0

remind your friend that (s)he should take some time to think for themselves and be open to new news sources and information. if they are scared off by "right-wing"... i hate to break it to you, but your friend is afraid of a boogeyman label.

also, wikipedia is cucked af, but trying to explain that to your friend is harder than just saying the above.

1
bobobob 1 point ago +1 / -0

OAN is the only American news network that's actually covering US and world news. The rest of the networks just cover Trump 24/7. You'd think that nothing else is going on in the world judging by their coverage.

1
englishpleb 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tell him conspiracy is the same as collusion, and the mainstream media has been pushing false ones for the last 4 years (e.g. Russia-gate).

1
maleitch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wikipedia is an openly far left propaganda arm for the DNC in this country. The founder openly admitted it. Is that what the wikipedia page on wikipedia states? No?

1
Berzerker_king 1 point ago +1 / -0

which informed person in his right mind uses wikipedia as a political compass in today's day and age?

1
maleitch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does he not see the fucking irony of him going to a biased source to find out the "truth" about other biased sources? It is fucking laughable how self unaware people are about themselves and their own idiocy.

Did you ask him if he knows the political leanings of wikipedia founder? No? Why doesn't he know, and why did he not want to find out?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
MeSewCorny 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is far right but the Wikipedia editors literally state that NY Times and CNN are considered the gold standard as sources. 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

1
BurgerChef90 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Conspiracy theory" aka true things that the MSM refuses to say actually happened to save their, and the DNC's asses.