4073
Comments (131)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
84
spezhatesgays 84 points ago +85 / -1

The fact we are even doing hearings... Just confirm her.

43
The_Litehaus_Abides 43 points ago +44 / -1

I'd rather have it this way too. There's no law that there have to be hearings and we need her on the SC now.

14
Ben45 14 points ago +14 / -0

I don't have any problem with doing a hearing at the committee, to go through her record and make sure she is a good pick. But it is redundant at the full Senate.

19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
4
EvanOnTheFly 4 points ago +5 / -1

To be honest, she is owed a hearing . If they don't get a hearing for her entire career on the supreme Court she will always have an asterisk next to her name is the only woman that was pushed through without a hearing . The prior hearings and confirmations don't really count. I mean they would for me and I think they would for most republicans, but it would be an attacking point for literally the rest of her time on the supreme Court.

I think we know the outcome if things get a little crazy gram can just shut it all down and hold a vote one day but to be honest I think Amy is owed whatever the Republicans can give her out of these hearings in terms of a true hearing. We all know the Democrats will throw a freaking clown world fiesta. But what else is new.

2
cnn_can_dox_my_balls 2 points ago +3 / -1

fuck your asterisk. she will be attacked by the left for all time regardless. have they stopped attacking Clarence Thomas? stop playing nice

5
magaspif 5 points ago +6 / -1

And miss out on more retardation from our libtard friends? NO

7
BigCovfefe 7 points ago +7 / -0

correct answer here. Let the dems embarrass themselves.

1
MAGATRAIN2k20 1 point ago +1 / -0

The hearings are political theatre. They have no bearing on the actual confirmation