Modifying content would not itself be illegal. One suggestion is to carve out an exception to 230 saying if you do not act in good faith as a platform you will be treated as a publisher of your own content, including user content on the site.
That would then open you up to lawsuits for other reasons. Another suggestion is to allow libel suits up to $5000 per affected user if there is suspected discrimination based on speech.
All of these suggestions have had requirements where only behemoths that make over $1billion revenue and have over X million active users. In those proposals T_D would be fine, if 230 is fully removed and not replaced no site would be safe from lawsuits.
Modifying content would not itself be illegal. One suggestion is to carve out an exception to 230 saying if you do not act in good faith as a platform you will be treated as a publisher of your own content, including user content on the site.
That would then open you up to lawsuits for other reasons. Another suggestion is to allow libel suits up to $5000 per affected user if there is suspected discrimination based on speech.
All of these suggestions have had requirements where only behemoths that make over $1billion revenue and have over X million active users. In those proposals T_D would be fine, if 230 is fully removed and not replaced no site would be safe from lawsuits.