139
Comments (24)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-6
Kansityshuffle88 -6 points ago +2 / -8

I can see exhibiting a weapon charge, even though the law itself is unconstitutional, but tampering with evidence?

What did they tamper with? The state sponsored destruction of their lives?

Edit: Jesus people I know it's not right, but the AG down there is a Soros bitch so yeah I can see the charge

10
Womp_womp 10 points ago +10 / -0

I believe the pistol she had was disabled. Meaning it could not fire. This is not a crime to demilitarize your own weapon if in fact they did it. Apparently, rumor is the police FIXED it while it was in their custody. This leads me to believe it wasn't the McClosky's tampering with the weapon.

Regardless defending your property from a degenerate mob of communist arsonists, murderers, and vandals is not a crime. They should be commended.

1
MicTheIrishRogue 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Police Department Crime Lab recorded that they made the weapon functional at the instruction from the prosecutor.