TIPP doesn’t over sample. You realIze some pollsters actually try to be accurate and figure out who is winning right?
And polls in 2016 weren’t majorly wrong. The cunt did win the popular vote right around where she was polling. This whole attitude that all polls are fake and wrong is a major COPE by people on this site. Biden has a legitimate chance at winning. A lot of people on here are in for a huge shock.
You are judging the veracity of these polls based on a false premise.
This year is not the same as 2016.
You understand that the globalist elites are going to try even harder to demoralize Trump voters.
In 2016 they thought that there was no way that Trump could win, they learned that they were wrong.
This year, they will be and already are pulling out all the stops.
I am wary of polls myself because I have often been the person asked to run polls in an academia setting. I left quickly when they made it clear I had no choice but to give them the answers they wanted and not get real data.
Is it that unlikely that this year that even pollsters that were honest last cycle could change their ways if they were encouraged or threatened to change by those who have enormous power?
The problem I have with this theory. A lot of these pollsters are independent and run their own firms. So the “give me the answers” I want approach has to be flawed.
Obviously the polls that say trump is down 12 points are bullshit. But it’s very plausible for him to be down 5 points nationally. It’s impossible for trump to win the popular vote. Or any conservative for that matter.
If you believe President Trump then you can believe that there is a Deep State bureaucracy running the biggest government agencies in the U.S. but you don't believe that they are able to influence some polling firms? What I am suggesting is not something anywhere near far-fetched.
I agree that it is possible that Trump is really down nationally anywhere from 1-5 points currently due to the shitshow of the Wallace Biden tagteam debate and the positive COVID diagnosis.
I do disagree with you that it is impossible for Trump to win the popular vote. I think it is unlikely for him to win due to how many rabid Democrat voters there are in the largest cities it but that is not the same thing as completely impossible.
What would be impossible is how some people here actually believe that Trump can win 49 states. That is truly impossible.
I am not deluded and I am not stuck in that echo-chamber way of thinking.
I predict that Trump can win the election by a reasonable margin electorally. I am guessing anwhere from 290-330 electoral votes.
I think it is likely Trump will still win but it will be close thanks to the voter fraud they will undoubtedly bust out.
And polls in 2016 weren’t majorly wrong. The cunt did win the popular vote right around where she was polling. This whole attitude that all polls are fake and wrong is a major COPE by people on this site.
AHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH
Even Nate Silver has said that’s BS. The polls had her up by around seven pints in October before magically coming down two weeks prior to the election.
TIPP doesn’t over sample. You realIze some pollsters actually try to be accurate and figure out who is winning right?
And polls in 2016 weren’t majorly wrong. The cunt did win the popular vote right around where she was polling. This whole attitude that all polls are fake and wrong is a major COPE by people on this site. Biden has a legitimate chance at winning. A lot of people on here are in for a huge shock.
You are judging the veracity of these polls based on a false premise.
This year is not the same as 2016.
You understand that the globalist elites are going to try even harder to demoralize Trump voters.
In 2016 they thought that there was no way that Trump could win, they learned that they were wrong.
This year, they will be and already are pulling out all the stops.
I am wary of polls myself because I have often been the person asked to run polls in an academia setting. I left quickly when they made it clear I had no choice but to give them the answers they wanted and not get real data.
Is it that unlikely that this year that even pollsters that were honest last cycle could change their ways if they were encouraged or threatened to change by those who have enormous power?
The problem I have with this theory. A lot of these pollsters are independent and run their own firms. So the “give me the answers” I want approach has to be flawed.
Obviously the polls that say trump is down 12 points are bullshit. But it’s very plausible for him to be down 5 points nationally. It’s impossible for trump to win the popular vote. Or any conservative for that matter.
If you believe President Trump then you can believe that there is a Deep State bureaucracy running the biggest government agencies in the U.S. but you don't believe that they are able to influence some polling firms? What I am suggesting is not something anywhere near far-fetched.
I agree that it is possible that Trump is really down nationally anywhere from 1-5 points currently due to the shitshow of the Wallace Biden tagteam debate and the positive COVID diagnosis.
I do disagree with you that it is impossible for Trump to win the popular vote. I think it is unlikely for him to win due to how many rabid Democrat voters there are in the largest cities it but that is not the same thing as completely impossible.
What would be impossible is how some people here actually believe that Trump can win 49 states. That is truly impossible.
I am not deluded and I am not stuck in that echo-chamber way of thinking.
I predict that Trump can win the election by a reasonable margin electorally. I am guessing anwhere from 290-330 electoral votes.
I think it is likely Trump will still win but it will be close thanks to the voter fraud they will undoubtedly bust out.
AHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH
Even Nate Silver has said that’s BS. The polls had her up by around seven pints in October before magically coming down two weeks prior to the election.