Everyone with a pistol brace get ready. ATF is going to war with the creator of the Honey Badger. They ruled one of his pistols is an SBR. This is just one pistol, and one company. But it is the start of the plan uncovered back in June. ATF is sick of the brace, and they want the tax money they get for SBRs. We elected Trump to stop shit like this. I know some of the President's people lurk here. You want voter problems? Fuck with our guns. Defang the ATF now. For more info look up Colion Noir's latest video. Upvote this until someone important sees it!
Comments (61)
sorted by:
I think he’s trying to keep it from turning into a Leftist rally point.
Man, they ReeeeEeeeEeeEEEEEEEEEeeeE at ANYTHING 2A. That's one thing I give zero fucks about compromise on. And this is with a republican administration. What do you think would happen under a Democrap administration? I could not care any less about what people who don't even have a basic understanding of guns or how they work want. It's always US that has to compromise ( surrender ). No way. Trump has to do Better.
I agree. But you could say the same about HCQ. Do you want Trump to trigger that kind of firestorm right now, about guns? He’s good at choosing the right moment to win battles, instead of just fighting them.
Personally I expect him to reverse this just like the Marines Gender-neutral terminology. That happened about six months from it’s widespread introduction, and a week after it hit the mainstream press.
I'm not sure I get the relation of hcq with our 2A. Medicine is not enshrined in our constitution. Guns are. And accessories have been upheld forever as also part of the 2A. It's just been lately they've been trying to Infringe on them aggressively. They've really sped up on striking down our firearms/accessories in Trump's first term, with no legal ground. And yet they do it.
Can’t agree with that part. The relation with HCQ is that both issues are pretty straightforward and clear to anyone with any amount of intellectual honesty. But HCQ shows what happens on even that type of issue when Trump turns attention to the topic — it sparks a reactive firestorm that can set things back rather than move them forward.
Trump does best when he can wrest some control over the timing — which is what I think he tried to do with the bumpstock ban — delay and deflate the angry post-Walmart shooting media-inflamed atmosphere against guns, with an (unconstitutional) order he expected to be reversed by the courts.