776
posted ago by AGhost ago by AGhost +776 / -0

Everyone with a pistol brace get ready. ATF is going to war with the creator of the Honey Badger. They ruled one of his pistols is an SBR. This is just one pistol, and one company. But it is the start of the plan uncovered back in June. ATF is sick of the brace, and they want the tax money they get for SBRs. We elected Trump to stop shit like this. I know some of the President's people lurk here. You want voter problems? Fuck with our guns. Defang the ATF now. For more info look up Colion Noir's latest video. Upvote this until someone important sees it!

Comments (61)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-1
stonepony -1 points ago +2 / -3

It was the smart move, for the greater good, to deny the left that talking point.

Brown bag laws should all go.

Being angry and stamping your feet doesn't change the facts. Bumpstocks were the left's primary attack angle on our 2A rights. And Trump took that away from them.

"And propaganda will always be with us", it will, yes. And if you care about our 2A rights, like the President does, you should acknowledge the effectiveness of propaganda. Trump was right, and you're wrong.

1
American-stormcloak 1 point ago +1 / -0

"stamping my feet". For my 2A rights? Damn right. Not sorry either. You might be fine with the erosion of our 2A rights but I'm not. And banning stuff because the left screeches about something is reactionary. They scream about climate change too. Should we ban fracking and drilling oil? Should we open our borders? Your argument only benefits the left.

-2
stonepony -2 points ago +1 / -3

Trump protected your 2A rights by disarming the people who want to remove your 2A rights. Bumpstocks were an effective tool for the left to attack our 2A rights. Trump took that away from them. I'm sorry you lack the capacity to comprehend.

Trump is right, you're wrong. You might be on the wrong website here.

3
American-stormcloak 3 points ago +3 / -0

He protected our rights by infringing on them? Wow. Haven't heard that one before. I'm sorry you lack the capacity to understand "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED UPON".

MAYBE YOU'RE ON THE WRONG SITE. I supported Trump from day one. I was slamming cruzers early on for their childish ways and risking the 2016 election for hurt feelings. I'd crawl over broken glass on my knees to vote for him. Just because you say "Trump was right and you're wrong" doesn't make it true. Infringement happened. Fact. That didn't protect our rights. Fact. It only gave way to more erosions. Fact. You ain't gotta like it but those are facts. He hasn't been the great defender of the 2A and needs to do better.

This doesn't mean I'm gonna cut my nose off to spite my face and vote for biden. Trump is my guy all the way. But Trump has to do better on the 2A.

-1
stonepony -1 points ago +1 / -2

It did help protect our rights. Bumpstocks were the left's best argument, your best argument, to take our rights away. He disarmed them and he disarmed anti-Trump whiners like you. You're just a checkers player and it's over your head.

Trump was right, you're wrong.

Not really interested in your confused CNN transparently anti-Trump shill nonsense. But I'm looking forward to seeing you at an MSNBC town hall lying about being a former Trump supporter asking some pathetic planted question about Trump opposing our 2nd amendment rights.